Rohingya woman feeding her child / photo: newsedges.com

There is a new estimation which shows that just eight men own the same wealth as the poorest half of the world.
In a report published by Oxfam, it stated that as growth benefits the richest, the rest of society, especially the poorest, suffers.
“The very design of our economies and the principles of our economics have taken us to this extreme, unsustainable and unjust point. Our economy must stop excessively rewarding those at the top and start working for all people,” it wrote.
It also mentioned accountable and visionary governments, businesses that work in the interests of workers and producers, a valued environment, women’s rights and a strong system of fair taxation, are central to this more human economy.
It is four years since the World Economic Forum identified rising economic inequality as a major threat to social stability and three years since the World Bank twinned its goal for ending poverty with the need for shared prosperity.
Since then, and despite world leaders signing up to a global goal to reduce inequality, Oxfam said that the gap between the rich and the rest has widened, stressing that this cannot be allowed to continue.
As President Obama told the UN General Assembly in his departing speech in September 2016: ‘A world where 1% of humanity controls as much wealth as the bottom 99% will never be stable.’ Yet the global inequality crisis continues unabated:

  • Since 2015, the richest 1 percent has owned more wealth than the rest of the planet.
  • Eight men now own the same amount of wealth as the poorest half of the world.
  • Over the next 20 years, 500 people will hand over $2.1 trillion to their heirs – a sum larger than the GDP of India, a country of 1.3 billion people.
  • The incomes of the poorest 10 percent of people increased by less than $3 a year between 1988 and 2011, while the incomes of the richest 1 percent increased 182 times as much.
  • A FTSE-100 CEO earns as much in a year as 10,000 people in working in garment factories in Bangladesh.
  • In the US, new research by economist Thomas Piketty shows that over the last 30 years the growth in the incomes of the bottom 50 percent has been zero, whereas incomes of the top 1 percent have grown 300 percent.
  • In Vietnam, the country’s richest man earns more in a day than the poorest person earns in 10 years.

Oxfam stressed that growing inequality threatens to pull our societies apart, which in the end increases crime and insecurity, and undermines the fight to end poverty.
From Brexit to the success of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, Oxfam said that a worrying rise in racism and the widespread disillusionment with mainstream politics, there are increasing signs that more and more people in rich countries are no longer willing to tolerate the status quo.
“Why would they, when experience suggests that what it delivers is wage stagnation, insecure jobs and a widening gap between the haves and the have-nots?” it asked.
Hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of poverty in recent decades. An achievement of which the world should be proud, it noted. Yet one in nine people still go to bed hungry.
“Had growth been pro-poor between 1990 and 2010, 700 million more people, most of them women, would not be living in poverty today,” Oxfam said.
Research finds that three-quarters of extreme poverty could in fact be eliminated now using existing resources, by increasing taxation and cutting down on military and other regressive spending.
The World Bank is clear that without redoubling their efforts to tackle inequality, world leaders will miss their goal of ending extreme poverty by 2030.
There are several reason which cause the inequality. The main keys are corporations work for those at the top, squeezing workers and producers, dodging tax, super-charged shared holder capitalism, crony capitalism, the role of the rich in the inequality crisis, avoiding tax, and buying politics.
However, there are false assumptions which drive the economy of the 1 percent.  The IMF has identified neoliberalism as a key cause of growing inequality and stated that unless we tackle these false assumptions, we will be unable to turn the situation around:

  • The market is always right, and the role of governments should be minimized.
  • Corporations need to maximize profits and returns to shareholders at all costs.
  • Extreme individual wealth is benign and a sign of success, and inequality is not relevant.
  • GDP growth should be the primary goal of policy making.
  • Our economic model is gender-neutral.
  • Our planet’s resources are limitless.

There is a need to create a new common sense, and turn things on their head to design an economy whose primary purpose is to benefit the 99 percent, not the 1 percent. Work to be done to create a more human economy that benefits everyone, not just the privileged few. A human economy which would create fairer, better societies.
A human economy would have a number of core ingredients aimed at tackling the problems that have contributed to today’s inequality crisis.

  • Governments will work for the 99 percent.
  • Governments will cooperate, not just compete.
  • Companies will work for the benefit of everyone.
  • Ending the extreme concentration of wealth to end extreme poverty.
  • A human economy will work equally for men and women.
  • Technology will be harnessed for the interests of the 99 percent.
  • A human economy will be powered by sustainable renewable energy.
  • Valuing and measuring what really matters.

“We can and must build a more human economy before it is too late,” Oxfam stressed.
The world’s 8 richest people are, in order of net worth:

  1. Bill Gates: America founder of Microsoft (net worth $75 billion)
  2. Amancio Ortega: Spanish founder of Inditex which owns the Zara fashion chain (net worth $67 billion)
  3. Warren Buffett: American CEO and largest shareholder in Berkshire Hathaway (net worth $60.8 billion)
  4. Carlos Slim Helu: Mexican owner of Grupo Carso (net worth: $50 billion)
  5. Jeff Bezos: American founder, chairman and chief executive of Amazon (net worth: $45.2 billion)
  6. Mark Zuckerberg: American chairman, chief executive officer, and co-founder of Facebook (net worth $44.6 billion)
  7. Larry Ellison: American co-founder and CEO of Oracle  (net worth $43.6 billion)
  8. Michael Bloomberg: American founder, owner and CEO of Bloomberg LP (net worth: $40 billion)

Oxfam’s calculations are based on global wealth distribution data provided by the Credit Suisse Global Wealth Data book 2016
The wealth of the world’s richest people was calculated using Forbes’ billionaires list last published in March 2016.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

不分文、理科 马国中四生明年可选修科目

明年起,马来西亚中四生料能根据自己的兴趣与倾向选修科目,不再有理科与非理科之分。 马国副教育部长张念群,接受《星洲日报》询问时表示,随着中学标准课程(KSSM)明年开始在高中阶段落实,中四生将不再有理科或非理科源流之分。 “学生可根据自己的兴趣与倾向选修科目。学生将根据所选修的科目被安排教室。” 对此,她表示,学校辅导员委以重任,协助学生做出正确的选择,此外,学生的课堂评估与中三评估考试(PT3)也会作为参考指标。 她说,目前中四学生的科目包括英文、马来文、历史、道德、数学和高级数学,而理科项目则包含化学、生物、物理,商科则有科学、会计和经济。学校则被赋予自主权,可根据师资与学校的设备,为中四与中五生提供相关科目的资源。 学校被赋予自主权,以根据师资和学校设备等因素,为中四和中五的学生提供相关科目。 目前中四学生的科目有英文、马来文、历史、道德、数学和高级数学;理科生的科目还有化学、生物、物理,商科生的科目则是科学、会计和经济等。 早在今年2月,马国教育部长马智礼曾指出,国家教育政策研究委员会提出的建议之一,就是不再将学生以理科或非理科区分。 他表示,“在即将落实的新课程中,我们将不仅强调理科,还会加强艺术(和文化),因为知识是一体的,知识无法分隔,应该是综合的。” 他也续指在大学与学校,将会不断地加强校内艺术课程。 他说,向前迈进的方向是要将科学、技术、工程、数学(STEM)生活化,而STEM将被提升为“STREAM”,即除了原本的科学、技术、工程和数学外,还包括艺术和阅读。

Consider allowing peaceful protests: Sylvia Lim

In Parliament on Monday, Workers’ Party Member of Parliament, Sylvia Lim, asked…

【选举】林鼎抨击行动党恐惧政治、疫情下办选举

人民之声党领袖林鼎,在今日(8日 )最后一日竞选期,抨击行动党的恐惧政治,以及在疫情下举行选举。 此外,他也点评网络流传的原贸工部长陈振声的闭门会议外泄音频。他质疑过去行动党都配合危机的时机,召开选举以此拯救自身政党。 尽管目前选举已在进行,林鼎强调, 政府理应优先稳定疫情局势。而似乎现在是利用冠病19疫情的危机,举行选举希望能一举歼灭反对党。 然而,这等同要牺牲国人的性命安全,包括仍在上学的孩童和教师们。 有关流传音频相信是录制于去年1月9日,在行动党武吉班让西北分部的一个闭门会议。当时陈振声向与会的60名出席者,谈到过去40年行动党的选情模式。 尽管他强调党员仍需去做好正确的事,不过他也分析,上届选举,已故建国总理李光耀的逝世拯救了行动党,在上届是911危机等。 至于稍早前陈振声已回应,录音部分被断章取义,却被恶意公开流传。它本身则希望国人能理解他演说的情境,包括赢得选举和九天的竞选活动无关。关键在于多年的努力。