Second Minister for Finance Lawrence Wong

John Tan, the Vice-Chairman of Singapore Democratic Party, wrote an open letter to the Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong, asking about the banning of Sigma Elevator, a lift manufacturer in October 2015.
He stated that there are two questions to be answered. Did the Minister know about the ban on Sigma Elevator in October 2015? If he did, why did he not inform the public about it and that Sigma lifts were involved for the accidents and if he did not know about the ban, why not?
The Straits Times reported last week that Sigma Elevator, a lift company, had been banned from tendering for new HDB projects since October 2015 because of poor performance of its lifts.
Mr Tan noted that even after a spate of serious lift malfunctions that resulted in severe injuries and even one death, Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong did not reveal this fact.
Here is what he wrote in full:

The Straits Times reported last week that Sigma Elevator, a lift company, had been banned from tendering for new HDB projects since October 2015 because of poor performance of its lifts.
But after a spate of serious lift malfunctions that resulted in severe injuries and even one death, Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong did not reveal this fact.
In October 2015, an elderly woman’s hand was cut off when a lift door malfunctioned. Then, MP for the ward, Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, called for safety standards in lifts to be raised and a strong system of auditing for regular checks on lifts by maintenance contractors. Mr Wong remained silent.
In January 2016, the doors of a lift remained open as the elevator continued to move. In March, another lift shot up 17 floors because of faulty brakes.
It was only in March 2016 that Mr Wong indicated that the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) would step up checks of lifts saying “we want to be thorough in our checks and cannot compromise on safety”.
Even after this assurance, more lift mishaps resulting in one elderly man’s death and a woman fracturing her spine occurred. Several lifts have also either functioned in a dangerous manner or have completely broken down. Again, no mention of the Sigma problem by Mr Wong.
It is now discovered that more than half the reported cases of major lift incidents in 2015 and 2016 involved Sigma as a manufacturer or maintenance contractor. Many of these incidents involved lifts that were both old and new.
Read also SDP calls for COI on lift mishaps in light of EM Services investigations
Mr Wong needs to answer two sets of questions:
One, did he know about the ban on Sigma Elevator in October 2015 ? If he did, why did he not inform the public about it and that Sigma lifts were responsible for the accidents? Why did he not order an overhaul of the company’s lifts to ensure that they were safe for use?
Two, if he did not know about the ban, why not? How does the Minister ensure the public’s safety when he was not aware of such a grave development?
It is important that the Minister fully explains to the public what exactly took place and why the omission.
John Tan
Vice-Chairman
Singapore Democratic Party

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

为爱蒙蔽双眼? 人协前经理因参与洗钱被判坐牢20个月!

“为爱蒙蔽双眼”?一名人民协会前选区经理,被指陷入爱情骗局,协助“外籍情郎”开设户口接受诈骗案赃款,涉及金额高达43万元。 她在庭上承认触犯贪污、贩毒和严重罪案(没收利益)法令下的三项控状、以及不诚实接受赃物控状,今日被判入狱20个月。 这名女被告(Ng Koon Lay)64岁,尚有16项控状仍待法官斟酌下判。据案情显示,2015年,被告上网结识了两名男子–“美国水手”Greg L Johnson和“瑞士石油交易商”David Bay,两人对被告展开追求。 被告出现财务困难时,向“美国水手”借钱。“美国水手”声称有朋友能借9千元给她,但是转账过程却很诡异,要求被告提供银行账户,接受有关7万1000元款项,再把6万2000元转给另一账户。 银行账户被用来接受赃款 2016年9月,商业事务局还曾警告被告,不要再使用银行账户接收款项,因为被告接收的7万1000元,实则是一笔电邮诈骗案的赃款! 被告随后把与“美国水手”联系的脸书账号,交给了商业事务局。然后转过头来,又设立新账号联系“美国水手”,再向对方借钱,接受了约11万8360新元款项,再把8万9860新元转到另一账户。当然,这笔钱也是诈骗案赃款。…

WP will release updated audited AHPETC report soon: Hougang MP

On Sunday, Hougang MP, Png Eng Huat, said the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town…

【选举】民主党走访选区 民众申诉公积金议题

民主党财政林文兴周日(21日)走访马西岭-油池集选区,就已有民众向他抱怨公积金以及国人面对的低收入议题。 林文兴当时是偕同该党潜在候选人高梅兹(James Gomez)和中委达曼胡理(Damanhuri Abas),走访上述选区。据林文兴叙述,其中一名专业惟工程师的居民,表达对公积金制度的不满。 这名居民指出自己并不需要领入息,只需要给他选项,好让自己能把特别户头的储蓄,转移给五名孩子,来协助他们解决成家立业、买房子等生活开销。 “这名居民还说“如果无法帮助这些孩子们,就别想让他们响应政府多生育得号召”。” 再者,这位居民也抱怨外籍专才对本地人就业机会构成竞争、也使工资被拉低的现象。林文兴则分享,该党呼吁全额归还公积金积蓄给退休人士的倡议。