Minister for Transport Khaw Boon Wan has asked that the six-month trial to allow foldable bicycles and personal mobility devices to be brought onto public transport at all times of the day, should be allowed to run its course before making any policy decisions, as it has just started only about a month ago
This is his reply to MP Er Dr Lee Bee Wah MP of Nee Soon GRC who asked the Minister for Transport what are the findings of the ongoing pilot project to allow foldable bikes and e-scooters on MRT trains and buses, whether the Ministry will consider disallowing this during peak hours when the trains are very crowded, and what action can be taken if a passenger fails to fold the bike or e-scooter on the trains.
Mr Khaw said that so far, the public response has been positive and there have been few complaints. From observations, the very large majority of the commuters who brought bicycles or personal mobility devices on board buses and trains behaved responsibly and courteously, and in particular, folded the devices.
“Those who do not do so are liable to a maximum fine of $500 upon conviction,” he noted.
Land Transport Authority (LTA)  had announced that the trial would begin on 1 December 2016, saying that commuters would be allowed to bring foldable bicycles and PMDS which meet the following dimensions – a length of up to 120cm, a height of 70cm and a width of 40cm – on board public transport at any time of the day.
LTA also announced that only one foldable bicycle or PMD is allowed on the bus, passengers have to keep the bicycles folded at all times, the devices must be switched off during the trip, and passengers must cover the dirty wheels and protruding parts.

Source : LTA.
Source : LTA.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“合法化任何形式审查” 功能八号吁政府撤除防假消息法

新加坡公民组织功能八号氏族会(Function 8),对于政府在国会提呈《防止网络假消息与网络操纵法案》感到遗憾,并要求政府撤下有关法案,遵从宪法赋予人民的言论自由。 该组织认为,毫无疑问该草案将在下个国会会议中通过,对各个层面群体,不管是国人、外籍人士、社会和企业都会造成深远影响,终结掉新加坡原本就饱受拘束的言论空间。 法案对于被指控涉及散播假消息的人士或机构,可施以一年至10年的监禁刑期;罚款两万元至100万元不等。不遵守更正或撤文指示者,还要面对每日10万元的罚款。 该组织认为,法案几乎合法化了任何形式的审查。缺乏明确的功能标准定义,任何部长或公仆,都可以被指派为“主管部门”,有权力发出诸如要求更正、删除文章、停止通信、封锁、目标性更正、总更正指示、公开发信者网络位置、禁止令等等。 “这些公务员获得绝对权力,来决定哪些是真,哪些是假。这种裁决权理应在司法机构手上。如果这些人士犯错,他们又能豁免于加诸平民百姓身上的刑罚。” 功能八号要求政府撤出防假消息法,因为政府的职责理应是捍卫宪法赋予人民的言论自由,而不是通过打压性质的法令,强权把这些公民权益夺走。

K Shanmugam masterfully links photo and comment of Thum Ping Tjin as him inviting foreign politician to intervene in Singapore politics

Speaking on sidelines of a grassroots event on Sunday, Home Affairs and…

Health Minister “不三不四”? (Neither here nor there)

by Leong Sze Hian On 29 January, the Ministry of Health (MOH)…

Letter to the Attorney-General to re-open Coroner’s Inquiry for Dinesh

The family of Dinesh Raman s/o Chinnaiah, who died in Changi Prison…