The Court of Appeal has passed its landmark judgement in the case between Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) and Dr Ting Choon Meng/The Online Citizen, stating that the Singapore Government is not deemed as a “person” under the section 15 of the Protection from Harassment Act.
The three-judge CA has determined that the government cannot use the provision in the act as a person in a split judgment with Judge of Appeal Andrew Phang and Chao Hick Tin in majority with Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon dissenting.
This means it is final to say that the government is not entitled to use POHA to seek protection from the “harassment” from Dr Ting and The Online Citizen (TOC) and the two need not comply with the demands set by the court in the previous rulings.
MINDEF through the Attorney’s General Chambers (AGC) had earlier appealed against the High Court’s ruling that the government is not entitled to make an application under Section 15 of the Protection from Harassment Act (POHA) and it is not “just and equitable” for MINDEF to use Section 15 on a statement made by a local inventor against MINDEF.
The High Court had earlier ruled on 9 December 2015 that the Government cannot use the POHA to make The Online Citizen (TOC) take down statements on its site made by Dr Ting Choon Meng, co-founder of medical device firm MobileStats Technologies against the MINDEF.
Earlier on 15 January 2015, TOC reported on Dr Ting’s recount of the sequence of events which transpired between his company, MobileStats Pte Ltd and MINDEF. Dr Ting alleged that MINDEF had infringed his patent for “Mobile First Aid Post” and had the patent revoked through a ‘war of attrition’ in the courts.
In response, MINDEF disputed Dr Ting’s claims with its own statement of facts published on cyberpioneer’s facebook fanpage and sent a letter of demand to Dr Ting and TOC on 28 January via the Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) threatening to use the POHA.
Dr Ting and TOC declined to accede to the AGC’s demands set out by the letter, which then led to MINDEF to proceed with legal actions against Dr Ting and TOC on 11 February via the use of POHA to seek protection of harassment from the two.
The move by the government to utilise the POHA to censor news about itself is seen as an unexpected move as the act was promoted as a legislation to protect the weak and vulnerable by the Ministry of Law, K Shanmugam in Parliament.
Dr Ting’s patent remains revoked till date.

(Above: Dr Ting’s interview with TOC that spurred the actions of MINDEF)


TOC would like to thank the efforts of the legal team from Eugene Thuraisingam LLP in defending of the website against the claims of harassment by MINDEF, especially since the legal firm is fighting the case on a pro-bono basis.
If not for their assistance, TOC would have given in to the legal suit filed by AGC/MINDEF as the site does not have the same financial backing as the government to fight the case.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lim Tean to organise second rally at Hong Lim Park on 16 March

Following the success of his first rally on Saturday (26 January), Lim…

“I’ve created all these jobs…”: PM Lee

Explaining why there are more foreign professionals in Singapore, Prime Minister Lee…

“Extraordinary measures” not needed yet to deal with worsening trade war: DPM Heng Swee Keat

Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said on Thursday (17 October) that…

泰选委会指违反选举法 准备取消塔纳通候选资格

泰国选举委员会周二(4月23日)指责,著名反政府政治新星塔纳通违反了选举法,在大选后一个月的昨日,准备取消他的国会候选人资格。 40岁的泰国未来前进党党魁塔纳通,被指控在登记成为候选人后,仍然持有一家媒体公司的股份,因而触犯了选举法令。 自2014年军事政变以来,泰国首次全国大选的结果仍然不明朗,而将于5月9日公布的大选成绩,将决定支持军政的党派是否有足够席位让军政领导人巴育继续掌权。 选举委员会副秘书长Sawang Boonmee说道,“有证据证明,塔纳通是V-Luck Media公司的持有者或股东”。“根据宪法和选举法,它将无法成为议员候选人。” 塔纳通斥指控存政治动机 塔纳通此前曾否认违反选举法,表示在注册成为候选人之前,他已经于1月8日出售了该媒体公司的股份。他也指责有关的指控具有政治动机。 而目前,他有七天的时间向选委会举证,以反驳有关的指控。 若被判违反选举法罪名成立,塔纳通将被禁止竞选一年。而且他还可能因为参加选举而面临刑事指控,因为他在明知道自己资格不足的情况下参选,有可能被判10年徒刑和20年的政治禁令。 从荷兰返回泰国的塔纳通在脸书上贴文说到,“我刚刚得知必须尽快回国准备应对意外情况。泰国见” 。…