Source : Love Our MacRitchy Forest

Minister for Transport Khaw Boon Wan stated that site investigation works on the two alignment options have commenced, and are expected to complete by end-2018 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Cross Island MRT Line.
Mr Khaw was responding to the questions by Mr Louis Ng Kok Kwang, MP of Nee Soon Grc who asked the Minister for Transport whether the Ministry can provide an update on site investigation works on the two alignment options as part of Phase 2 of the EIA for the Cross Island MRT Line and how is the Ministry engaging volunteers from the nature community to monitor and manage the impact on the ground as the rainy season increases the risk of spills into forest streams caused by boring works.
Mr Khaw stated that the Government consults with the nature groups regularly. LTA has also appointed one of the nature group representatives as an advisor to monitor and audit the implementation of the Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan developed in Phase 1. Though no mention of the actual nature group is made. 
The CRL is a 50km long new train line announced in January 2013 as part of Singapore’s aim to “improve the connectivity, accessibility and coverage of the rail network” to support Singapore’s potential growth in the future. The CRL is targeted to be completed by 2030.
According to LTA, the SI works for the CCNR will start in December 2016 and is expected to complete by 2017. Throughout the SI works, a team of LTA officers and the contractors will work closely with the National Parks Board (NParks) and the nature groups to ensure that all mitigating measures are rigorously implemented.
Both the direct and skirting alignment options are being studied. The findings from the SI works will provide inputs to Phase 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), which assesses the impact of construction and operations for the two possible alignments.
Only after the SI works, Phase 2 of the EIA, and taking into account the various concerns and considerations from all stakeholders as well as the potential impact on the CCNR, will the Government take a decision on the alignment.
Earlier in July 2013, the Nature Society released a position paper that states the soil investigation activities involving the core drilling of 70 metres deep bore holes along the alignment will cause tremendous permanent damage to the habitat. The society has since made recommendations to LTA for them to adopt alternative routes for to have the MRT line rerouted so to avoid cutting through the reserve.
In March 2016, Member of Parliament from the Yishun GRC, Mr Louis Ng Kok Kwang asked the Minister for Transport, Mr Khaw Boon Wan, about the main factors taken into consideration when deciding on the possible underground alignments in the vicinity of the CCNR for the CRL.
He also asked if the Ministry would consider the alternative alignment along Lornie Road which will allow the MRT line to serve more residents and commuters in that vicinity and will result in the protection of the nature reserve and primary forest.
In reply, Mr Khaw said that the alternative alignment to skirt around the nature reserve for the CRL will cost commuters six minutes of additional travel time. He said: “Some people say it’s just six minutes, but I’m not sure we can just brush aside the extra six minutes just like that because for MRT commuters, even an extra half a minute is terrible.
“We know this because when a train gets disrupted and there’s a one-minute delay, within that minute, they can send out maybe 100 tweets to flame LTA or SMRT. So one minute is a lot of time, let alone six minutes. That’s why in the rail industry, they define disruption as anything that causes a delay of more than five minutes and six is more than five.”
Mr Khaw added,  “The skirting alignment on the other hand, is about 9km long… and because it is 9km long, it will require longer tunnels. And therefore, it would require ventilation shafts, ventilation facilities on the surface whereas the earlier option, because it is short enough…you do not have to build all those…exhaust ducts…These options could incur around 2 billion dollars in expenditure, 2000 million dollars and could result in land acquisition.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

James Gomez on political future: “I don’t back down in a fight”

By Deborah Choo TOC recently caught up with local civil society activist…

DBS CEO, previously embarrassed by disruptions in March, apologises for May outage

DBS and POSB Bank customers in Singapore experienced service disruptions on 5 May, marking the second major outage in two months. Many were unable to access online and mobile banking services, and numerous ATMs were non-operational. DBS CEO Piyush Gupta apologized and assured that a Special Board Committee is overseeing a full review of the bank’s IT resiliency to prevent future disruptions. He had previously said he felt embarrassed during the bank’s Annual General Meeting (AGM), two days after the March’s disruption. The Monetary Authority of Singapore called the incidents “unacceptable” and imposed an additional capital requirement on DBS Bank.

《联合早报》等境外媒体受邀访新疆 BBC记者揭采访受监督 “再教育营”“转换思想”

今年4月,中国国务院新闻办安排八家中国境外媒体,前往新疆参观两所职业技能教育培训中心。其中一家即是我国中文媒体《联合早报》。 人权组织和一些西方媒体,此前批评中国政府打压和监控新疆维吾尔族穆斯林,而联合国指当地有过百万穆斯林被关押在“再教育营”。 对此,中国政府近期安排境外媒体前往新疆,试图向外展示这些“再教育营”的现况。中国政府称之为“育职业技能培训中心”,指这些中心乃是透过教育“转换”这些学员的思想,同时提供技能培训,解决低知识水平和就业问题。 《联合早报》在4月23日在该报官网刊载有关报导,指受访官员和学员对记者有问必答,教培中心重点关注年轻人,因为进行暴力行为的潜力比年长者高,但他们同时又比年长者更容易接受“思想改造”。 称教培中心“去极端化” 该中心的维族校长介绍,教培中心的宗旨是让学员“三学一去”——学中文、学法律、学技能,以及去极端化。 而关于逼迫学员进行违反宗教信仰活动的问题,校长表示,没有逼学员吃猪肉、喝酒的情况。 而外国媒体也被带到乌鲁木齐的新疆国际会展中心,参观暴恐案例展。展览以一组超大尺寸的图片和一小段文字来呈现每个案例。死者照片血腥,呈现包括焦尸和无头尸等照片。简短的文字只交代事件的日期、地点、干案手法、死伤人数等基本信息,并把肇事者一律称为“恐怖分子”。为避免挑起民族之间的仇恨,展览一般不对外开放。 3月18日,中国国务院新闻办公室发表《新疆的反恐、去极端化斗争与人权保障》白皮书指新疆深受民族分裂势力、宗教极端势力和暴力恐怖势力“三股势力”影响,简介新疆恐怖主义和分裂势力背景,以及过去在新疆等地发生的暴力恐怖案件。 白皮书指: 自2014年以来,新疆打掉暴恐团伙1588个,抓获暴恐人员12995人,缴获爆炸装置2052枚,查处非法宗教活动4858起、涉及3万0645人,收缴非法宗教宣传品34万5229件。 BBC除了跟大队,还进行“暗访”…