Source : Ipsos-MORI.

The latest research by Ipsos MORI, the second largest market research organisation in the United Kingdom, places Singapore on the 8th most ignorant countries out of 40 countries in the world.

The latest Ipsos Perils of Perception survey highlights how wrong the public across 40 countries are about key global issues and features of the population in their country.

The key patterns are:

  • Most countries think their population is much more Muslim than it actually is – and that the Muslim population is increasing at an incredible rate.
  • All countries think their population is less happy than they actually say they are.
  • Most countries are more tolerant on homosexuality, abortion and pre-marital sex than they think they are.
  • And nearly all countries think wealth is more evenly distributed than it actually is.

Looking across the five questions on factual realities, there are clear patterns in which countries have a more accurate view of their countries. To capture this, they have calculated the Ipsos “Index of Ignorance”, as shown in the table below.

India receives the “honour” of being the most inaccurate in their perceptions on these issues with China and the US also high up the list. The Netherlands are the most accurate, followed by Great Britain, with South Korea in third.

What is interesting is that Singaporeans feel that people in general, feel less happier than what they have said themselves to be.

Respondents were first asked the question, “Taking all things together, would you say you are: Very happy, Rather happy, Not very happy, Not at all happy, and Don’t know.”

Following that, the respondent was then asked, “When asked in a survey in [country], what percentage of people do you think said that, taking all things together, they are very happy or rather happy?”

The results show that Singapore scored a 46% difference from their own happiness and others.

Source : IPSOS-MORI.
Source : Ipsos-MORI.

Singaporeans also do not have the idea of how many people actually do not own a house.

Source : IPSOS-MORI.
Source : Ipsos-MORI.

Singapore had the lowest score when it comes to underestimating the number of people in the country.

Source : IPSOS-MORI.
Source : Ipsos-MORI.

Bobby Duffy, Managing Director of Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute, London, said, “Across all 40 countries in the study, each population gets a lot wrong. We are often most incorrect on factors that are widely discussed in the media, such as the proportion of our population that are Muslims and wealth inequality. We know from previous studies that this is partly because we over-estimate what we worry about.”

“But in this new study we also show that we’re often unduly pessimistic about how happy people are and our tolerance on controversial issues such as homosexuality, sex before marriage and abortion. In many countries, particularly in the West, we have a picture of our population that is unduly miserable and intolerant. This is important: we know what people think of as the norm is important in affecting their own views and behaviours.”

Also interesting to note that respondents in Singapore were not asked questions about how they perceive homosexuality, abortion and etc because there are no similar surveys conducted on the issue, which raises a particular question about how the social consensus in Singapore on various issues are actually measured in reality.

“We also get facts wrong that will make us focus on some issues more than they perhaps deserve: for example, we tend to think our populations are much less likely to own their own home than they actually are. In many countries we have received the message loud and clear that pressure on housing and affordability are serious issues, but we’ve underestimated how many still own their home.”

“There are multiple reasons for these errors – from our struggle with simple maths and proportions, to media coverage of issues, to social psychology explanations of our mental shortcuts or biases. It is also clear from our “Index of Ignorance” that the countries who tend to do worst have relatively low internet penetrations: given this is an online survey, this will reflect the fact that this more middle-class and connected population think the rest of their countries are more like them than they really are,” he said.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PDPC fines computer service vendor S$4,000 over programming error resulting in disclosure of NSmen’s personal data

The Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) has issued a S$4,000 fine against…

刘程强跌倒头部受伤 阿裕尼集选区议员代行职务

根据新加坡工人党今日(3日)发布的文告,该党阿裕尼集选区议员刘程强,上月30日家中跌倒,头部受伤,目前仍在加护病房接受治疗和观察。 刘程强也是工人党前秘书长。 工人党文告提及刘程强意识清醒,家属希望大家给予私人空间,让刘程强可安心静养。 刘程强在选区里的职务,将暂时由该集选区其他议员代办,前非选区议员严燕松也会提供协助。

Telco manhole in Bukit Batok West explodes out of the blue

A telco manhole in Bukit Batok exploded out of the blue on…

院方病患跟进系统存严重缺陷 妇女起诉樟宜综合医院上诉得直

上诉法院星期二(2月26日)判定,若不是樟宜综合医院(CGH)的疏忽,肺癌病患的病情能够更早被诊断出来,并提早接受治疗,推翻了此前高等法院的判决。 关于医院应该支付给诺阿兹林(Noor Azlin Abdul Rahman,39岁)的赔偿金问题,则交由高等法院,由法官洪素燕进行评估。 法官鼓励院方寻求和解 在宣布以上判决时,上诉庭法官潘文龙指出,诺阿兹林的病情已经处在第四阶段,鼓励樟宜医院考虑与病患达成和解。 在新加坡大法官梅达顺以及上诉庭法官朱迪柏拉卡斯陪同下,潘文龙指出,“她(诺阿兹林女士)将因为身体状况,继续面临身心灵上的挑战,我们认为友好和解,将有助于(她)结束纠纷,能更专注于对抗癌症病毒和尽可能地恢复”。 “在我们看来,基于我们发现樟宜医院的疏忽,导致推迟诊断(诺阿兹林)患有肺癌,因此我们觉得作为权宜之计,院方应该有可能的解决方案。” 起诉医院和三名医生 诺阿兹林是在2012年2月被诊断患有肺癌。 她起诉樟宜医院和三名医生,因为2007至2011年,她都接受了这三名医生的治疗。诺阿兹林认为是医生的疏忽,导致延迟了她的癌症检测,失去了更好的治疗机会。有关控诉于2018年2月遭高等法院驳回,但是她提出了上诉。…