The Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) stated that it is investigating the cause of SingTel’s fibre broadband service breakdown which lasted all day from Saturday (3 December) morning till Sunday with a sizable number of consumers still stating that they were unable to connect despite stating that all service has resumed.

IMDA said in a statement on Monday (5 December) that it takes the telco’s service disruption very seriously and that it is also looking into the service recovery measures taken by SingTel.

The telco first announced that it was experiencing breakdown at around 11am Saturday morning, stating that some of their customers may be experiencing difficulties accessing their Fibre Broadband services and their engineers are working to resolve the problem.

It also stated that affected broadband customers who are also Singtel postpaid mobile customers will have their local mobile data charges waived for both Saturday (3 December 2016) and Sunday (4 December 2016).

At the same time, it also offered all affected customers a 10% discount on this month’s broadband subscription, which will be reflected in January bill.

The telco then announced on Sunday (4 December) morning around 9am that service has been resumed however many still claim that their internet connections were still down despite repeated attempts to reboot their routers and optical fibre modems.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MPA allows seafarers movement on certain conditions

Singapore has issued a way out which help address the friction in…

Chilling fake news law in Singapore will ‘rule the news feed’, says Amnesty International

Just a day before the Singapore parliament passed the Protection from Online…

李绳武上诉遭驳回 总检察署可境外递交法律文件

由大法官梅达顺、上诉庭法官郑永光和庄泓翔所组成的三司,于今午(4月1日)裁定驳回李显扬之子李绳武的上诉,总检察署获准在美国递交法律文件给李绳武。 李绳武也在个人脸书更新上诉进展。根据其贴文,总检察署无法引用2017年10月后的新法庭条例,应用在针对他藐视法庭的诉讼。 不过,上诉庭仍裁决允许总检察署,针对李绳武的脸书贴文涉嫌藐视法庭一案,在美国递交法律文件给后者。这是因为对于在境外涉嫌藐视法庭者,提交法律文件程序乃根据法庭条例的规范。 如今,案件审讯将转入实质的抗辩过程。 绳武:仍需证明我的贴文如何藐视法庭 李绳武透露对上诉裁决的失望,“不过,总检察署还是必须先拿出足够理据证明,我的私人脸书贴文何种程度上贬砥了新加坡的司法机构。” 李绳武也不忘抨击,在这长达1年又8个月的时间,政府又耗费了多少国家资源来对付他和他的母亲林学芬?“就我所知,我的伯伯李显龙似乎很满意现况,即便这让大家都想起了他在欧思礼路38号故居事件上的不齿行为。” 今年1月18日,大法官梅达顺和上诉庭法官郑永光和庄泓翔组成三司,受理李绳武的上诉,经三小时聆听双方陈词后,决定择日作裁决。 三司要求双方律师针对两个议题陈词,即:法院是否有行使实质管辖权的法律依据,来对付涉嫌在海外藐视法庭者? 以及,总检察署提出的新法庭条例,是否具有追溯力。 上诉庭曾指起诉绳武案出现“必然困难” 当时,大法官梅达顺在审讯时坦言,总检察署起诉李绳武一案,显现“必然的困难”(Inherent…

Legal Aid Bureau to revamp website to speed up the process for those in need

The Legal Aid Bureau (LAB), which is under the purview of the…