Proclamation of 1763 by Maria Cortes

“Nothing is certain except death and taxes” sagely spoke the great economist JM Keynes. Here, nothing is certain except a government hellbent on both collecting taxes and protecting the privileges of the rich.

I am talking of the go-ahead for on-line gambling, which was at the end of the day a fait accompli. The name of the game is fiscal sustainability or rather the threat to the figleaf of a low tax business friendly regime.

Ageing population require greater social spending, for example healthcare spending projected to rise to $12 Billion by 2020. Yet the government refused to do any of the most obvious options:

  1. Increase taxes on the rich,
  2. Re-allocate spending priorities e.g. from defense and heaven forbid exorbitant ministers and senior civil servant salaries,
  3. Adjust the constitutional spending rule to increase the amount of funds available from the reserves, after inflation adjustment.

No, the government refused to do any of those because the first two…. well they won’t want to encroach on the privileges of the rich when they themselves are rich and who wants to vote for a reduction in their own salaries, right?

The third has long ago become an end rather then a means to an end – hence it (the reserves) has taken a life of its own. Besides it is always useful kept in the back pocket in case more vote buying oops targeted spending is required.

What is left but to increase stuff like GST and taxes on vice? Hence on-line gambling comes handy.

It won’t be enough so in time to come other vice taxes perhaps like legalised prostitution. So don’t be surprised if a certain area in Singapore becomes a must-go for ogling at and engaging the services of scantily clad women and not quite women plying their trade behind large windows just like Amsterdam.

It might become a famous tourist spot also just like Amsterdam. While at it add in the “brown cafes” serving legalised pot, it’s supposed to be medicinal these days.

Make no mistake though ………. this government is running short of revenues. Its low tax, business friendly regime is predicated on fast economic growth (guess why the influx of foreign workers) and will come under pressure with the new normal of no more than two to three percent a year.

This article was first published on Chris Kuan’s Facebook.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

若放弃国籍可领走公积金,条件是不能定居西马?

假设某人要放弃新加坡国籍,并提走公积金存款,有什么细则值得注意? 一名脸书网友穆哈默佐(译音)在本地脸书投诉专页COMPLAINT SINGAPORE分享,中央公积金局(CPF Board)中有规定,如果新加坡公民或永久公民欲放弃国籍,他们仍能提取自己的公积金,但若是他们要迁移至西马,恐怕公积金会无法如预期提出。 该帖文目前已被删除。不过很显然,新加坡公民或永久公民欲要离开新加坡,他们仍然可以提取自己的公积金,但公民欲要在西马定居,就不能这么做。 欲要永久离开新加坡的居民,若要领取个人公积金,必须同意以下声明: 我并非是新加坡公民或永久居民 我即将永久性离开新加坡和西马,无任何意愿回到这两个地方就业或居住。 基本上,在你决定离开新加坡,领取你的公积金前,你必须永远都不会回到新加坡或西马,声明当中尤其强调“永久性没有意愿”回到这两个地方。 先移居东马,再搬回西马又若何? 这份声明是不是代表如果有人要摒弃新加坡国籍,移居东马(沙巴和砂拉越),就可领走公积金?但是,我们假设这人移居东马后,又再迁移至西马,新加坡政府是否会套用该声明,透过一些管道向有关人士索讨公积金,退还给政府? 这种诡异的情况已存在许久,但这又是为何?难道是政府避免人民滥用的机制,避免他们提取所有钱移居到马来西亚?…

李玮玲分享曾在福康宁公园骨折 六小时后被寻获送医

建国总理李光耀女儿李玮玲在脸书分享,两个月前(7月5日),她在福康宁公园散步时不小心迷了路,还遭遇右股骨骨折,所幸最终被警察发现。 她指出,当时他在公园内,转入基督教青年会附近的小巷后突然骨折,结果跌坐在草地里。由于十多年前也曾有类似骨折经历,她判断应是右股骨骨折。 尽管尝试爬回走道,惟骨折处的摩擦和周边的痉挛,令她疼痛难忍。 李玮玲在帖文中提到,当时认为自己接近步道的起点,以为可以唤来帮佣和爱犬,惟即使大声呼叫声音也难以到达。 但即便如此,前总理女儿仍处变不惊,相信在新加坡不会让任何人走失太久。她指出,她晚间八点出事,跌坐在潮湿泥地一直到凌晨两点,所幸一批警察找到她,并把她送到新加坡中央医院就医。 ”总而言之,要感谢我的幸运星,感谢找到我的警察、帮我救治送医的医护人员、在医院看护我的医生护士。“ I was walking alone in Fort…

Exploring the Extent of Executive Discretion

~ By Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss ~ Part-time cleaner, Mdm Vellama d/o Marie Muthu…

为减少糖尿病比例 我国或成首个禁含糖量高饮料广告国家

为了能够制止糖尿病比例上升,我国成为首个禁止含糖量非常高的包装饮料的广告的国家。在含糖量高的饮料必须贴上“不健康”的提示警告。 无论是瓶装、罐、二合一或三合一的即溶饮料、汽水、果汁、酸奶等饮料,若含糖量超标,将需换上营养包装。 《海峡时报》报导,卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉今日(10日)宣布上述消息,并表示鼓励换包装是为了民众能够作出更明智的选择,同时也促使业者将饮料的含糖量减少。他指出,包装上将会贴上含有不同颜色的标签表示含糖量等级。其中已有30多个国家开始实施这项措施,例如智力在实施该项措施后,其不健康饮料的销售量降低25巴仙。 当然含糖量并非是饮料上唯一成为不健康饮料的因素,其中也包括其他的因素,如饱和脂肪。而不健康的饮料将会贴上“不健康的标签“,但针对健康饮料可以用该标签作为广告。唐振辉表示,鼓励生产健康饮料的业者妥善使用该标签,为自己的饮料大力推广。 唐振辉表示,每天多喝250毫升的单链结合蛋白(SSB)会增加高达26巴仙的糖尿病风险。日前,也有调查指出,新加坡人每日都会从含糖饮料中,摄取的超过六茶匙的糖分,同时也导致了新加坡主要健康问题。 当局也将随着法国的措施,推出以字母和颜色区分的标签,共五个等级,A级为最健康、E级为最不健康。目前当局策划将强制C到E级较不健康的饮料印上标签,A级和B级则无需这么做。E级高糖饮料则将被禁止在所有大众传媒打广告,包括电视、网络、纸媒或是巴士站等户外场所。 专家:糖税有利于抑制民众过多摄取糖分 尽管一直在劝导民众减少摄取糖分,但许多业者在饮料上并没有降低至每250毫升5茶匙的平均含量,甚至部分饮料还超过了每250毫升8茶匙的糖分,而高含糖饮料又尤其受到民众欢迎。 对此,卫生部与健康促进委员向4000多名公众、厂商和专家等,征询有关四大减糖措施的看法包括强制性贴上营养标签,宣传限制、征收糖税、以及禁止高糖分饮料。七成以上的人支持强制性贴上营养标签,逾八成的人支持分级标签。 在质询期间,饮料业者曾强烈反对对高糖饮料征收糖税或实施禁令,并声称不会因此而减少糖的消耗。而也有人提出该四项措施除了针对饮料以外,也应该针对所有含糖食物。 卫生部指出,有人担心即使禁止了含糖饮料但消费者可能也会用其他食物来代替糖分所需。 新加坡国立大学公共卫生学院院长Teo…