The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has stated that Singapore Pools Private Limited (Pools) and Singapore Turf Club (STC) are suitable to be exempt operators under the Remote Gambling Act (RGA), therefore, they will be allowed to offer remote gambling services for their existing products, under a stringent set of conditions.

The RGA came into force in February 2015.  The law takes a prohibitive stance against gambling. It prohibits remote gambling activities and provides law enforcement agencies with the powers to tackle remote gambling and its associated concerns.

MHA said that the RGA criminalises the entire spectrum of remote gambling activities, from individual gamblers to persons who facilitate or provide remote gambling services. It also provides a comprehensive set of blocking measures, namely website blocking, payment blocking and advertising bans. This law is part of a multi-pronged strategy to deal with remote gambling. Other components include stepping up enforcement and expanding public education and outreach.

According to MHA, several hundred online gambling sites have been blocked since the RGA came into force, along with bank accounts and credit card transactions linked to remote gambling payments.

MHA stated that its blocking regime is one of the most comprehensive in the world, and significantly restricts and impedes access to remote gambling, it is not straightforward to eradicate remote gambling totally.  A complete ban would only serve to drive remote gambling underground, making it harder to detect and exacerbate the associated law and order and social concerns. The RGA, therefore, provides for a tightly-controlled exempt operator regime to mitigate these concerns.

MHA states that this approach is not unique to Singapore. Jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and Norway have adopted a similar approach and also allowed regulated authorised operators.

Under the RGA, an exempt operator must be not-for-profit and be based in Singapore.  It must also contribute to public, social or charitable causes in Singapore.

STC and Singapore Pools submitted applications for exemption certificates in May and July respectively last year.

MHA said that it has conducted thorough checks and assessment of the applications, and found both suitable to be exempt operators.  The exemption is granted only for their existing products.  The exempt operators will not be allowed to offer casino-style games or poker.

MHA claims that it has imposed stringent operating conditions on both entities.

The two entities have to keep their management and operations of the remote gambling services free from criminal influence, ensure the integrity of their operations and implement social safeguards and responsible gambling measures.

Singapore Pools and STC will be issued exemption certificates when they launch their remote gambling services in the next two months. The certificates will be valid for a period of three years.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Heng Swee Keat throws in the towel as touted successor to Singapore premiership

Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat has announced on Thursday (8 Apr)…

医师未及时告知副作用重罚10万元 法庭推翻裁决判无罪

一名骨外科专科医师为女病患注射药物后,在纾解疼痛和消炎之前,没有提前通知她相关风险和并发症等,日前被纪律审裁庭重罚10万新元。 但三司特别庭认为,并不是每项违反医疗标准行为,必然构成专业失当的行为,推翻此前裁决,上述医师判无罪。 鹰阁医药中心的Alpha Joints & Orthopaedics诊所担任骨外科专科医生的林联安医生,被指在2014年10月27为一名女病患进行核磁共振成像扫描后,让病患选择带上护具和口服药物,抑或是注射药物,病患则选择后者,而医师却未向病患解释药物注射的副作用:严重的发炎和红肿情况、皮肤萎缩、皮肤脱色、皮下脂肪萎缩和肌腱破裂等并发症,而两小时后,病患感觉异常,于2016年提控医师。 当时,新加坡医药理事会展开纪律审裁庭,他也认罪,最终判处重罚10万元。 事情曝光后,引起医学界一片哗然,认为纪律审裁庭处置过重,故逾6300人力庭医师,联署请愿卫生部长阐明立场并介入。 卫生部认为或涉及“防御性医疗”(“defensive medicine”),需经过高庭审判。 防御性医疗指医务人员为了减少医疗风险、保护自我而实施的偏离规范化医疗服务准则的医疗行为。 据《亚洲新闻台》报道,三司特别庭在裁决中指出,“在不危及生命下,医无需向病人解释每个潜在风险。”…

Audio recordings to be allowed in inward-facing in-vehicle recording devices (IVRDs) in taxis and private hire cars (PHCs)

Audio recordings will now be allowed in inward-facing in-vehicle recording devices (IVRDs)…

酒驾“吃”道酿二死惨案 马国司机入狱18个月

冷冻食品大卡车司机酒驾,转换车道时“逼得”隔壁车道的货车刹车不及,撞上反向道的电单车,酿二死一伤事故,被控鲁莽驾驶罪成,面对18个月的监刑,远比一般的9个月刑期多了一倍。 受雇佣于马来西亚食品公司的被告,于去年6月29日下午5时,要将24公吨的冷冻食品,利用大卡车运到我国。 他在衔接了冷冻货柜到拖车头后,就去喝了三罐黑啤酒,然后到车上睡至晚上9时才启程。 他抵达马国关卡时已经11时许,但是因为捍卫酒醒,所以在新柔长堤行驶时忽然“吃”进右边车道。该车道上的货车司机见状就紧急刹车,货车却失控冲过中央分界堤,撞上反向道的三辆电单车。 其中一辆电单车的马国骑士(20岁)当场被货车碾死,另一辆本地电单车骑士(42岁)也被撞至重伤,送院急救不果,还有一电单车骑士受伤。 控方指被告有职责在身,需要驾驶重型车辆却喝酒,简直是无视其他道路使用者的安全,而被告的鲁莽行为导致二人死亡和多人受伤,更造成死者家属无法弥补的创伤,因此需要严惩。 他建议法官对被告判下18个月监刑和吊销执照,并指严厉的刑罚除了能够惩罚被告之外,也能够起到提醒作用,保护其余的道路使用者。 被告于周二(3日)出庭时,承认犯下鲁莽驾驶导致他人死亡罪名,因此被判坐牢18个月和吊销驾驶执照10年。 在没有代表律师的情况下,被告曾经向法官求情,表示自己是家中的唯一经济来源,尚有病母和没有工作的姐妹要照顾,希望法官能够从轻发落。