The following opinion piece was submitted by PM.Haze (People’s Movement to Stop Haze) / 人民抗烟霾行动.

Earlier this year at a primary school, we asked students if they remembered the 2015 haze. A boy mustered up enough courage to say “my grandfather died”. Turns out the haze may be deadlier than we thought. A new study released on Monday estimated that 100,300 people in Southeast Asia died prematurely due to the haze last year; the number of premature deaths in Singapore is estimated at 2,200. Although this figure was refuted by the Ministry of Health (MOH), it is an undeniable fact that haze as a type of air pollution has an impact on health. The study also poses a serious question to all of us in Singapore: why should we live with the deadly smoke when we have the means to stop it?

Haze is the symptom of a string of environmental and social crisis created ultimately by the increasing demand of crops like palm oil. Indonesia currently has 8.1 million hectares of oil palm plantations, and total acreage is projected to reach 13 million hectares by 2020. The increasing demand for palm oil drives unsustainable expansion of plantations marred with deforestation, peat drainage, burning and land conflict. While the Indonesian government took commendable measures to stop the fires, the majority of our own Singaporean businesses involved in the palm oil supply chain, especially the palm oil buyers, have not taken action to stop the haze.

An enticing solution to the haze problem is to boycott palm oil. However, palm oil is 5-8 times more productive than other oil crops such as canola. Switching to other oil crop would mean we need more land and we will clear more forests. And that’s not what we want. Instead, we should use haze-free palm oil. Haze-free palm oil is simply palm oil produced without burning and deforestation. At the moment, palm oil that’s certified by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) is the closest to being haze-free. However, RSPO-labelled products are still largely unavailable to consumers in Singapore. Therefore getting companies to use RSPO-certified palm oil is the first step towards being haze-free.

In Singapore, palm oil is the main ingredient of cooking oil used by restaurants and hawkers. It is mostly labelled as “vegetable oil”, as if we squeeze it out from bok choy. Back in July this year, the volunteers at People’s Movement to Stop Haze (PM.Haze) embarked on an investigation project to find out the use of palm oil in our favourite restaurants. We visited 33 outlets of famous restaurant chains along Orchard road, including those in Takashimaya, Paragon and Somerset 313. To our surprise, 32 out of 33 use palm oil for cooking. We also surveyed the edible oil businesses and found that five can supply RSPO-certified cooking oil in Singapore with additional costs of 6-10%. Comparing with the amount of oil used in each end product, the difference in cost is negligible. IKEA Singapore already switched to 100% RSPO-certified cooking oil in their restaurants last year. Therefore businesses can switch to RSPO-certified cooking oil and reap in reputational benefit.

While people in Singapore suffer from the haze, our own Singaporean businesses should no longer be complicit in the crime, especially when relatively low cost solutions exist. After the investigation, we spoke to many businesses that use palm oil, but most were reluctant to switch to RSPO-certified palm oil, citing the lack of consumer awareness and demand. We realised that consumers have to voice out their support for haze-free palm oil in order to drive change in the businesses. As a result, PM.Haze recently launched a campaign to raise awareness of haze-free palm oil and to call for restaurants to go haze-free. In just the first few days of the campaign, it has attracted the support of over 20 Singapore-based organisations and more than 300 individuals. It is now up to the businesses of Singapore to show that they care about their customers and our common environment.

Find out more about the #GoHazeFree campaign at pmhaze.org. FB: www.facebook.com/pmhaze

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

女佣处境如现代奴隶 客工组织质问港新马改革意愿

上周,本地一对经理夫妻因为虐待缅甸藉家庭女佣麦麦丹,妻子被判坐牢47个月罚款4000元,丈夫则判坐牢24个月和赔偿女佣3000元。 劳工组织关注东南亚区域外籍女佣的境遇,过去一些东南亚国家的女佣远赴中东工作,以为能获得优渥薪资,却惨遭虐打、被迫超时工作,有者也面对性侵等威胁。 但是,近年来劳工组织也接获举报,那些在香港、新加坡和马来西亚等地工作的女佣,也面对一定的歧视、乃至如同奴隶般的待遇。 新加坡客工维权组织,情义之家(HOME)执行董事诗娜坎瓦坦言,这类对女佣不公的事件虽一再发生,但是在改善保障女佣的努力方面,却仍有差距。 她分析,有可能因为维持现状反而在经济上对所有人有利,致使改革的动力匮乏。对政府而言,福利和关怀组织可以照顾那些低薪女佣。 坎瓦说,新加坡每五个家户就有一家有请女佣。但在我国女佣也面对着种族和性别上的歧视。“他们是隐形的,被关在门后,为国人做不愿亲自下手的肮脏工作。” 这也致使本国一直缺乏动力去修法,以更好地保障这些低收入客工的处境。 在香港,女佣甚至连“二等公民”都不是 香港国际移工联盟主席恩妮列达莉(Eni Lestari)则指出,在香港,客工比较像是三等、四等公民,甚至连阶级都没有。 “我们的生活如同现代奴隶,因为我们的法律权益不被认可,待遇差过其他劳工。” 早年只有富裕家庭才有帮佣,如今中等收入家庭也可负担得起,加上女性投入职场,对女佣的需求增加。在香港,家中没有帮佣,有49巴仙的25-54岁妇女会投入职场。有请帮佣则比例可提升至78巴仙。…

Joseph Nathan: 4G political jargoning shows their lack of political competency and courage

by Joseph Nathan The irony of the 4G politicians just got more…

现实版《穿着Prada的恶魔》? 网民历数服装公司16罪状

日前本地主流报导,有本地服装品牌公司因业绩不好而体罚员工青蛙蹲200下。不少网民亦站出来,历数该公司的16罪状,包括要求工作必须早到迟退、两个月要染发一次、新人必须为先出钱帮旧员工打包等等,甚至还侵犯个人隐私,包括查看手机、询问假日活动等! 《新明日报》报导某服装店(Southxxxx)体罚员工后,虽然有旧员工辩护,是员工自愿挑战青蛙蹲,但是网友Yong Ling Lee于8月22日在脸书群组 “新加坡工作介绍所” 贴出长文,分享她在该服装连锁店内所面对的种种 “挑战” 。 自掏腰包为旧员工打包 来自马来西亚的她指出,那是她在我国的首份工作,因薪资而选择在该公司工作。然而,工作的第一天就让她“大开眼界”了,新员工需要每日自掏腰包,为旧职员外出两次打包餐点。旧员工所点的餐点都不便宜,新职员除了要先出钱为他们打包之外,自己也只能跟着在同一家餐馆打包,没有其他的选择,且要差不多一两周后才能拿回“打包费”。 “我们是销售衣服的,不是当你们的傀儡,请问这个包括在我的工作范围吗?” 早到迟退…

Foreign labour policy & income disparity in Singapore

By Edmund There has been a disconnect between the profits of businesses…