Source : YouTube.

The report by the Constitutional Commission headed by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon on the Elected Presidency review has been released on last Wednesday (7 September) .

The review that was initiated by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong took six months of deliberation based on feedback from four public hearings and more than 100 written submissions.

One of the key recommendations offered by the commission is that it suggested safeguards to ensure a minority president can be elected from time to time, by reserving a Presidential Election for a racial group if it is not represented for 5 terms.

Only if there is no representative from the racial group would the election be opened to all, and the reserved election will be brought forward to the next election.

Channel News Asia (CNA) in a collaboration with the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) had earlier conducted a survey and posted an article on 18 August on race relations which resulted, according to the media, that most Singaporeans prefer someone of the same race to hold the nation’s highest position.

The survey, was conducted between June and July, on a nationwide survey of 2,000 citizens and permanent residents on their views on relations between the country’s four major races.

However, more than 90 percent of the readers who commented on the article disagree with what the research had said.

Speaking in an interview with MediaCorp which was aired on 4 September, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong stated that the proposed changes are not tokenism, but the right step for Singapore’s future, as under the current system, minority candidates would find it hard to be elected.

He said, “It is a very necessary symbolism of what we are as a multiracial society – what Singapore means, stands for and what we aspire to be.”

However, this recommendation also raised people’s disbelief on the issue and spurred them to comment that the ruling party, People’s Action Party has double standards on the Presidential Candidacy and its own choice of Prime Minister:

  • Tan Desmond wrote, “Mr PM Lee. Why not hold a national referendum asking Singapore citizen if we want a minority president by force or let us choose the best man available that day. Are we so childish even after 50 years of nation building?”
  • Terence Sim wrote, “So it is not just ‘if a(ny) minority president is not elected’ but ‘if a president is not from a particular racial group for so and so terms’. It’s worst than I thought.

    How many ‘Official’ minorities is the Government going to acknowledge for this program. We will have Indians and Malays. How about Eurasians, Arabs or other minor groups? Will we end up with a Presidential office which rotates in a round-robin style among all the ethnic groups? It does not seem to serve much purpose except to parade our minorities for minority’s sake.

    It’s not a very bad idea but the proposed execution is terrible and instead promises to further divide Singaporeans along our ethnic lines. If the system already believes that we will be biased in our voting and attempts to preemptively compensate for it, we will most likely follow suit. It is a self-fulfilling prophecy.”

  • Kumar Pillay, “My question is so much hype that Singapore cannot have a Chinese president all the time thus this new initiative. What about becoming a PM? To me it’s silly. I am a Singaporean and it does not matter who becomes the president or PM. Why are we selecting by race and not a Singaporean.”
  • Thorsten Oliver Marquardt wrote, “What if more than one race has not been “represented” after five terms? This is a very like scenario considering all the different races that exist.”
  • Lee Harry wrote, “Why PM candidate cannot be minority – totally unethical move.”
  • Shawn Yee wrote, “When a malay president gets elected, he/she will not earn any ounce of respect from the masses. He/she will be known as the token president, even if he/she was fully qualified. This is what happens when affirmative action is introduced. Candidates get discredited and racial tensions are fueled. Also, this changes the voting mechanism. Why is there not a referendum held so that the public can decide for themselves. It’s always a case of Lee Hsien Loong decreeing regardless of public opinion.”
  • Guo Xiongwei wrote, “Why dun we have that rule for DPM & PM? Anyone knows if we ever had a Malay for DPM…. or PAP thinks Malays are not suitable for those 2 positions?”
  • Bruce Lim wrote, “Let’s do this for the prime minister as well.”
  • Dominic Goh wrote, “Ensuring minority races gets a chance to be President. Why not start with the PM position first.”
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Son displeased with more than S$23,000 bill incurred for mother’s cataract operation at NUH

Last Saturday (21 December), The Straits Times (ST) forum published a letter…

MOM: 7 workplaces ordered to close, 52 employers fined for failing to comply with safe management measures

Two weeks since the circuit breaker ended on 2 June, the Ministry…

Khaw Boon Wan: Footpaths in Singapore wide enough to accommodate both pedestrians and cyclist at same time

Minister for Transport Khaw Boon Wan has stated in Parliament that footpaths…

公路上“飞来横祸”! 铁管飞出击中女子肩膀

女子在高速公路骑着摩托车,不料飞来横祸,疑似遭一辆货车上掉落的铁管击中肩膀,导致他血流不止,到医院治疗缝了12针。 网友Ismawati Ali 11日在脸书上发文讲述自己的可怕经历,她表示该事件发生于9日傍晚6点45分左右,位于前往大士方向,靠近卓源路(Toh Guan Road)出口处的泛岛高速公路路段。 她忆述,当时她正前往蔡厝港的路上,途中却遭一条约一米长的铁管从前方货车掉落。 当时,她正在第一条车道上行驶,而货车则是在中间的车道,突然间,她看到有东西飞出来,原来是车上运载的铁管。 在情急之下,她立刻闪躲,深怕击中自己的头部或脸部,但不幸的是,尽管她当下已经意识要闪躲,仍被铁管击中肩膀,由于当时交通繁忙,并来不及转弯逃避,因此肩膀才会受伤。 “我很幸运的是,摩托车并没有失控,不然我可能会当场丧命,或被其他车辆撞到。” Ismawati 接着表示,当时因为货车后方仍有一辆轿车挡住视线,让他无法确认货车的车牌,但她也认得货车的特征,即车上装有一个灰色的桶,但司机当时并没有使用网来固定里头的产品。…