Shanmugam

Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam stated on Thursday (8 September) that a president must be voted by Singaporeans in order for him or her to have real power against the Government.

Mr Shanmugam had a meeting which involved some 600 participants including representatives from voluntary welfare organisation and grassroots leaders from North West Community Development Council held at Chong Pang Community Centre.

The report of Elected Presidency review had been released by The Constitutional Commission headed by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon on Wednesday (7 September) after six months of deliberation based on feedback from four public hearings and more than 100 written submissions.

On Wednesday (7 September), the Constitutional Commission set up to review specific aspects of the EP where a panel presented an idea to just appointed a group of experts to handle the custodial functions, then appointed a president to handle the ceremonial roles as unifying symbols.

However, Mr Shanmugam said, “If you look at the commission’s report, the commission recognise that if a person or body is not elected then they cannot really say no and block the Government.”

The commission also recommended that before exercising his discretion on all fiscal matters the President must consult the Council of Presidential Advisers (CPA). However, with the level of CPA support making a difference to the Parliament majority needed, the Parliament is able to ignore the President’s decision.

Mr Shanmugam pointed out that since the body is not elected then it can only delay the decision and the Parliament can still override. “You have to ask yourself, do you want to give real power to an individual or a group. If you want to give real power then they have to be elected,” he said.

One of the participants asked him whether the Government would reversed to appointyed the President. Mr Shanmugam responded that the Government would unlikely to do so. He said, “Every single one of you probably voted in the 2011 Presidential Election. If I now come and tell you, you cannot vote any more, would you be happy? You will think the Government is trying to be funny.”

Some participants said that this EP were politically moved. Mr Shanmugam rejected the statement by pointing out that the commission was headed by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon and public hearings were conducted. He said, “All sorts of statements can be made but (I think they should) get back to basics and look at logic.”

Some were discomfort by the recommendation that if there is no president from a particular racial group for five continuous terms, the next presidential election should be reserved for candidates from that group.

Responded to this, he said that people would just need sometime to understand its nuances and clear up misunderstandings since the review had just been introduced for less than a week.

He said, “Some people were saying it will affect meritocracy. As the commission made clear, whichever race the candidate is from, they have got to fulfil the same criteria. So there is no question of lowering the criteria for a particular race.”

Talking separately in an interview with Channel NewsAsia’s Talking Point broadcast on Thursday (Sep 8), Mr Shanmugam said, “I think if you agree that there should be a criteria then the criteria should reflect the state economy.”

He said that the Commission’s report stated that under the new recommendation that the presidential candidates from the private sector must be at least CEOs of companies, there are more than 2,000 people would qualify.

He also stated that if the shareholders’ equity is to be raised to $500 million or more, there would be nearly 700 companies would qualify under this criteria.

He added, “The commission has heard representations, it’s received more than 100 submissions, it held public hearings extensively reported, so there is a considerable… not detailed understanding, but knowledge that these things are happening and I’m sure Singaporeans will pay attention to the Commission’s report, the logic behind the report and the government’s White Paper.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

主妇叹差太多了 不同诊所购疫苗价格差一倍

同一种疫苗,两个诊所卖两个价,价钱差几乎一倍,令求诊者费解。 有关疫苗为成人的麻疹、腮腺炎、德国麻疹联合疫苗(MMR)。一名不愿具名的家庭主妇(50岁)因下个月将到菲律宾旅游,需事先接受麻疹疫苗(MMR)注射,因此拨电到国立健保集团旗下的大巴窑综合诊所,询问有关疫苗价格,被告知每剂疫苗注射收费40新元。 不过,主妇的丈夫较早前,前往陈笃生医院的旅客保健及疫苗诊所接受注射,只收费29元。 而主妇的胞妹随后拨电询问新保集团旗下,淡滨尼综合诊所有关MMR疫苗注射收费时,被告知每剂疫苗收费仅20元3角。 主妇发觉,三间诊所的疫苗注射价格差距后,感到费解。她说道,虽然理解不同地方的价钱会有所差异,但是相差一倍是在太离谱了,更何况综合诊所都是政府的。“这种算是普通的疫苗,没理由价格相差这么多。” 新加坡卫生部在全国成人免疫计划下,促请成人能够注射两剂MMR疫苗,而注射费用也能使用保健储蓄支付。这个疫苗在我国三大区域医疗系统的综合诊所都有提供。 新保集团:多年未调整 国大综合诊所集团透露,每剂MMR疫苗注射收费40元;国立保健集团和新保集团告知媒体,他们综合诊所向7岁以上求诊者收费分别是40新元和20新元3角。前年甫成立的国大综合诊所,当时旗下共有五间综合诊疗所,其中四间还是从国立健保集团那儿接手的。 新保集团表示,虽然他们知道公共医疗机构的收费有所不同,但是该集团的MMR疫苗价格并没有根据多年来的价格变动而做出调整,所以收费仍是较为廉价。“在未来检讨价格时,MMR疫苗价格也会被列入当中,并把最新成本和病患所能承担的负担纳入考量中。” 另外两家疫苗收费较高的集团则表示,他们致力于为病患提供能负担得起的优质护理服务。 药物价格差别原因多 卫生部长颜金勇曾在2012年国会上提到,公共医院药物价格有差别的原因很多,包括他们在药物新旧合约上的买卖价格有变动、各机构的价格框架不同等。…

持工作准证入境 马国人只需居家七天

绿色通道或周期性通勤措施即将在8月10日开放申请,卫生部长颜金勇表示,基于马来西亚冠状病毒19的传播风险和我国相近,因此该国入境的工作证件持有者,只需要依循居家通知七天或以上。 也是跨部门防疫工作小组领导部长的他,是在昨日(8月6日)的记者会上,发表以上言论,并表示该国的染病率比我国低,因此马国入境者所可能带来的感染和被感染风险几乎一样。 他指出,当局是将马国的防疫措施和染病率等因素都纳入风险评估和考量范围后,才决定和该国达成绿色通道协议。 当被询问为什么将居家通知的时间改为七天,而不是14天时,卫生部医药服务总监麦锡威副教授指出,居家通知期是依据冠毒的最长潜伏期而定制,但是当局发现确诊病例多数在入境后的五、六天内就会出现症状,因此才选择将居家通知时间缩短。 “因此,针对染病率较低国家的入境访客,我们正在考虑缩短他们所需遵守的居家通知期限。” 麦锡威提醒道,周期性通勤服务只开放给由新加坡公司申请,让马国员工入境我国的工作者,以及要求入境马国的工作者,但是,公司却不能通过这渠道申请让在我国工作的马国籍员工回到马国。 此外,已成为新加坡永久居民的马国人士也无法使用的周期性通勤服务,他们在回到马来西亚时,都必须接受14天隔离措施及自费。 他指出,曾考虑过让马国籍永久居民也享有周期性通勤服务,会做出以上的不同安排,主要是因为这群人士在入境后所面对的行动管制以及其他措施。至于有哪些不同安排,他表示会在接下来的发布会中公布。 我国目前的冠毒检测费用介于200元左右,但是麦锡威指出,随着我国检测能力的提升,预计检测费用将会减低,让需要接受检测的入境者都能负担得起。

Two more confirmed imported cases of Wuhan coronavirus infection in Singapore, making seven cases in total

Two more imported cases of Wuhan coronavirus infection in Singapore has been…

ST accused of deliberate misreporting regarding purported settlement between IPIC and 1MDB

The Straits Times was accused of deliberate misreporting regarding what it calls…