Shanmugam

Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam stated on Thursday (8 September) that a president must be voted by Singaporeans in order for him or her to have real power against the Government.

Mr Shanmugam had a meeting which involved some 600 participants including representatives from voluntary welfare organisation and grassroots leaders from North West Community Development Council held at Chong Pang Community Centre.

The report of Elected Presidency review had been released by The Constitutional Commission headed by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon on Wednesday (7 September) after six months of deliberation based on feedback from four public hearings and more than 100 written submissions.

On Wednesday (7 September), the Constitutional Commission set up to review specific aspects of the EP where a panel presented an idea to just appointed a group of experts to handle the custodial functions, then appointed a president to handle the ceremonial roles as unifying symbols.

However, Mr Shanmugam said, “If you look at the commission’s report, the commission recognise that if a person or body is not elected then they cannot really say no and block the Government.”

The commission also recommended that before exercising his discretion on all fiscal matters the President must consult the Council of Presidential Advisers (CPA). However, with the level of CPA support making a difference to the Parliament majority needed, the Parliament is able to ignore the President’s decision.

Mr Shanmugam pointed out that since the body is not elected then it can only delay the decision and the Parliament can still override. “You have to ask yourself, do you want to give real power to an individual or a group. If you want to give real power then they have to be elected,” he said.

One of the participants asked him whether the Government would reversed to appointyed the President. Mr Shanmugam responded that the Government would unlikely to do so. He said, “Every single one of you probably voted in the 2011 Presidential Election. If I now come and tell you, you cannot vote any more, would you be happy? You will think the Government is trying to be funny.”

Some participants said that this EP were politically moved. Mr Shanmugam rejected the statement by pointing out that the commission was headed by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon and public hearings were conducted. He said, “All sorts of statements can be made but (I think they should) get back to basics and look at logic.”

Some were discomfort by the recommendation that if there is no president from a particular racial group for five continuous terms, the next presidential election should be reserved for candidates from that group.

Responded to this, he said that people would just need sometime to understand its nuances and clear up misunderstandings since the review had just been introduced for less than a week.

He said, “Some people were saying it will affect meritocracy. As the commission made clear, whichever race the candidate is from, they have got to fulfil the same criteria. So there is no question of lowering the criteria for a particular race.”

Talking separately in an interview with Channel NewsAsia’s Talking Point broadcast on Thursday (Sep 8), Mr Shanmugam said, “I think if you agree that there should be a criteria then the criteria should reflect the state economy.”

He said that the Commission’s report stated that under the new recommendation that the presidential candidates from the private sector must be at least CEOs of companies, there are more than 2,000 people would qualify.

He also stated that if the shareholders’ equity is to be raised to $500 million or more, there would be nearly 700 companies would qualify under this criteria.

He added, “The commission has heard representations, it’s received more than 100 submissions, it held public hearings extensively reported, so there is a considerable… not detailed understanding, but knowledge that these things are happening and I’m sure Singaporeans will pay attention to the Commission’s report, the logic behind the report and the government’s White Paper.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens baffled by ICA granting entry to Vietnamese woman as “girlfriend” of Singaporean man under the familial ties lane

The Vietnamese woman who was the first reported case in the KTV…

租户被指无视房规、拒搬迁 房东气到心脏病爆发

我国房东和租户纠纷本就不是新鲜事,但是房东开口要求租户搬迁已经五个月了还不成功,甚至被租户气到心脏病爆发,房东儿子报警求助就真的是新鲜事了。 事件的主人公为75岁的梁女士,以及两名来自香港的女租户。而据梁女士的儿子,叶先生(50岁)指出,原本租户只有一名时,并没有发生过这么激烈的摩擦事件,一直到第二名女子入住后,才开始从小摩擦变成大摩擦,导致梁女士心脏病爆发。 叶先生指出,梁女士自三年前丈夫逝世后,就独居在四房式组屋单位内。她之后认识了来自香港的女教友,了解到对方正在寻找落脚处,因此将一间睡房以500元月租的价格租给她。 香港女学生搬入后产生摩擦 两人相处不错,女租户就在第二年介绍了一名香港的女学生过来。 据叶先生指出,其母亲在女学生搬过来后首个月就开始“有意见”,指女学生无视母亲禁止煮食的规定,继续煮食还将厨房弄得很肮脏,还很浪费电,可以将冷气开足整日。 梁女士当时曾要求女学生搬走,岂知女教友当时却和女学生联手,无视条规,被梁女士指责还会顶撞,甚至将住家弄得乱糟糟。 忍无可忍之下,梁女士在去年12月开始要求两人搬迁,但是两人继续无视,还出言伤人,导致梁女士被气得精神压抑。 叶先生指母亲是在今年4月尾向他哭诉,要求他帮忙“赶人”。然而叶先生于5月8日晚上尝试和她们交涉时,就遭到对方拒绝见面。他等了一小时后,就先行离开,随后传简讯要求两人在24小时内搬走。 两名女租户在当天晚上就去敲其母亲的房间,将后者吵醒后质问为什么要让叶先生介入他们的纠纷,甚至一度不让后者休息。其母亲费了很大力气将两女推开,才得以关上房门休息。 要求出钱修冷气 事情过了一段时日,两名女租户却在周二(5月19日)给叶先生发简讯,指冷气坏了,要求他找人修理。…

In Court Today – Little India Riot case: Daily Renewal of S-Pass

In Court Today – Little India Riot case: M Ravi, representing Mr…

【冠状病毒19】7月28日新增359确诊

根据卫生部文告,截至本月28日中午12时,本地新增359例例冠状病毒19确诊,不过仅有一例社区病例。 本地累计确诊已增至5万1197例。入境病例两起,在抵境后已遵守居家通知。 新增病例大多是住宿舍客工,社区病例是一位是工作证件持有人。