Mdm Chung, Yang, & Mdm Chang

Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Sanjiv Vaswani, who led the prosecution, asked after presenting sentencing submissions on Friday (9 September) for Yang to be sentenced at least 10 to 12 years imprisonment  for misappropriating $1.1 million belonging to the elderly and “vulnerable” Madam Chung on two separate occasions

Yang met Mdm Ching Khian Chun back in 2006 at a travel fair in china. He was also her tour guide during her tour to Beijing in 2008. They kept being in contact for years until in 2009, Yang moved into her bungalow on Gerald Crescent near Buangkok in February 2009 after the death of her husband. Only a month after his stay at her place, Young Music and Dance Studio was established in order for Yang to gain permanent residency here.

Yang is accused of cheating 89-year-old Madam Chung Khin Chun, a total of S$1.1 million. During the trial, Yang always said that Mdm Chung had given him all the monies.

A total of S$500,000 was transferred into his father’s account in China in 2010. Yang claimed that he bought a painting of a horse drinking water by a famous Chinese artist Xu Beihong on Mdm Chung’s behalf. The other S$600,000 was withdrawn in cash in January 2012. He claimed that he needed the money to register an art gallery business in Hong Kong. But in a separate civil suit against him, he said that he used the money to buy another five paintings.

It is said in court that Yang has always been inconsistent in giving the fact to the investigator. At one time, he said that the S$600,000 was used to register an art gallery. Then he said that he bought five paintings using the money. But then he changed the story again and said that the money was passed to Mdm Chung.

In 2010, Yang persuaded Mdm Chung to change her will, in which she obeyed. However, the will has been since revoked by the Court.

A senior investigation officer at the Commercial Affairs Department, DSP Jane Lim, stated that before February 2010, Mdm Chung had S$2,74 million in assets. She had S$950,000 in her bank account and S$1,78 million in unit trusts. But in August 2014, when her niece and guardian Ms Heidy Mok lodged a report, only S$9,212 was left in her current account.

At this moment the whereabout of $1.1 million that Yang had been misappropriated is still unknown. While another S$1,128,004 remains frozen in Yang’s bank account.

At the court, DPP Sanjiv said, “The lies and cover-ups pursued by the accused at length, years after the actual act of misappropriation was executed, demonstrate the depth of his commitment to deceit and fraud.”

Yang was arrested in September 2014. When Mdm Chung diagnosed with dementia, Madam Hedy Mok, who is Mdm Chung’s niece, stepped into the relationship. She reported Yang who was then arrested.

He was charged a month later. His offenses were mostly falsifying receipts made to his company so that he could stay in the country. In May 2016, Yang pleaded guilty, mostly for falsifying receipts to his company and immigration offenses.

However, his Defense lawyer Mr Irving Choh stated that Yang should not be put behind bar for more than 3 years, since he is a first-time offender. He was also the only breadwinner in the family which has financial burden due to his grandmother’s illness lately.

During the court, Mr Choh stated that the relationship between Yang and Madam Chung was nothing more that a grandmother with her grandson. He said, “Madam Chung treated my client like the grandson she never had. His desire to pay off his family debts got the better of him and landed him in this situation.”

He then showed pictures of the couple in their happy time. In one of the pictures, Yang was seen to cut Mdm Chung’s toenail, took her to take a walk, and accompanied her to eat.

However, DPP Sanjiv pointed out that those pictures were all taken on 20 August 2014, after Mdm Hedy had filed her suit against him.

The prosecutor questioned the intention of the photographs. “I think the inference is quite clear,” he said.

Yang could be jailed up to seven years and/or fined for each charge of criminal breach of trust. His case will be heard again on Sept 21. While sentencing will take place at a later date.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

195 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 182 locally transmitted cases, 135 linked to Jurong Fishery Port cluster and 12 belong to KTV cluster

As of Tuesday noon (20 July), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

林鼎挑战王瑞杰一对一直播辩论 公积金、就业和国家经济问题

人民之声党领袖林鼎对副总理王瑞杰下战书,挑战后者进行一对一直播辩论,针对新加坡的经济、就业和公积金等议题阐明立场。 “我们诚邀“新税先生”王瑞杰,来一场直播辩论,请他来说说为何行动党一再以中美贸易战,当作国家经济陷入糟糕情况的借口?” 他也指出,从2008年至去年,即便会员人数增长25巴仙,但20-25岁的公积金会员减少了三巴仙,这也显示在行动党政府领导下的隐忧,即未能为年轻人创造足够的就业机会,他们面对失业问题。 他说,透过辩论,年轻人可以去判断,自2015年担任财长至今,以及被视为总理接班人的王瑞杰,能不能应许他们一个更好的将来。 “当然,在直播中王瑞杰还能解释,为何不能揭露淡马锡和政府投资公司高管的薪资?反观其他国家如挪威和纽西兰的主权基金高管,做到透明和问责都未成问题。” 针对王瑞杰和贸工部长陈振声,在上周六指行动党政府认真看待“施政”,且在来届大选哪个政党有更好的政策引领新加坡前进,就能见真章,林鼎在脸书对王瑞杰下战书。 当时,王瑞杰和陈振声,表示不同意陈清木的“透明度削弱论”,指他一方面谴责执政党不够透明,一方面又批评政府在国会上辩论欧思礼路,自相矛盾。 王瑞杰也指出,国人多年来对行动党寄予信任,因为该党成功让国人有更好的生活素质。 “我们需要专注在主要挑战,我们为长远着想和及早处理问题的能力是关键,”他指新加坡正面对地缘政治和经济结果改变,执政党不会因这些政治论述而分散注意力,而是和国人携手合作应对当前挑战。 至于陈振声则辩称,如果国人有获得妥善照顾,国人自会清楚知道该信任哪个政党,所以应该专注在和国人切身相关的议题,例如就业和经济。

An amicable ending to an act of mischief by boy on bike

A motorist, Aaron Rylan Facebook page shared a video from his dashcam…

马共总书记陈平终于“回家” 巫统放软姿态:“尊重家属决定”

离开马来西亚超过半世纪,2013年9月16日在泰国合艾去世,马共总书记陈平生前遗愿是回到老家拜祭父母,致离世都无法如愿。 不过在一众老战友的安排下,成功在今年9月16日,把陈平的骨灰,送返马国霹雳州实兆远的老家。 据马国媒体报导,陈平亲属早在去年就委托陈平生前的老战友,组成“陈平亲朋好友及同志骨灰处理工作组”,安排把陈平骨灰运回马国。但为了避免引起争端,此前才未有张扬,行程保密。 该工作组负责人蔡建福,在昨日召开新闻发布会公布陈平骨灰“已回家”的消息。除了携带陈平骨灰到老家合照留恋,也前往红土坎本律华人义山,让陈平得以在祖坟前“拜祭”父母及兄嫂。 之后,他们带着陈平骨灰,乘船前往红土坎码头与邦咯岛之间的海域,将部分骨灰撒入大海;两日后将剩余骨灰撒到位于和丰的蒂蒂旺沙山脉山脚下,完成陈平的遗愿。 据了解,马国前朝政府国阵最大盟党巫统,在失去政权后也对陈平骨灰返马一事态度放缓;该党总秘书丹斯里安努亚慕沙指出,在宗教角度上,巫统尊重陈平亲友将陈平的骨灰运返马的决定。 “我们针对的是活人,不管是陈平或任何人,既然已经去世,那么我们应尊重家属要做的任何事,只要不违反法律。” 陈平原名王文华,17岁时加入马来西亚共产党,以在第二次世界大战时进行反英殖民斗争,过后则在日军侵略时,反过来获得英国的协助,对抗日军。 遭前朝政府内长拒绝 24岁时,陈平受委为马共总书记,并在1955年华玲谈判破裂后,走入马泰边境的森林。 自1989签署年《合艾和平协议》,渴望返回老家实兆远的陈平是第一个向马国政府申请回国的马共领袖。但却遭到拒绝,直至2013年离开人世都无法如愿以偿。 尽管此后陈平家属和老战友,都试图将其骨灰运返马国,却遭到时任马国国阵政府内政部长阿末扎希拒绝。当时他提出的理由,是考量到那些过往与马共战斗、或受害者家属的后代情绪。