Chairman of People’s Action Party (PAP), Khaw Boon Wan wrote that the next Prime Minister, if it is from the PAP, will be chosen by its next generation of leaders from among themselves.

This was mentioned in a letter written in response to Editor-At-Large Han Fook Kwang’s earlier commentary, “Relooking leadership renewal in Singapore“, that described the election process of the PM as being opaque as compared to other countries.

Mr Han was commenting on the succession process of PAP, the ruling party of Singapore which has held political power in the country from the day it gained independence from the British and the separation from Malaysia.

On the PAP’ selection process for the PM, he wrote, “Who makes the decision, apart from the PM, though isn’t clear.”, pointing out that PAP does not have a formal system of choosing its leader.

As PAP does have an election for its Central Executive Committee (CEC) every two years, Mr Han asked if the party should do so similarly to choose the next PM and commented that it should not also be such an opaque decision that no one knows what is happening until the succession announcement is made.

“Being more open and transparent would help Singaporeans understand better why a particular person was chosen and how the assessment was made.”

Mr Khaw in his letter wrote that he is surprised at Mr Han’s article as he had worked on many books with late founding PM, Lee Kuan Yew and heard Mr Lee describe in detail leadership succession in the PAP

Mr Khaw wrote, “We scour the country to find able, honest and committed people to field in elections. Possible candidates go through a rigorous vetting process. This begins the day after every general election.”

He goes on to state that the most promising among every cohort of MPs are then brought into government. They work with senior ministers, and are tested and stretched in a range of portfolios.

“In the process, they become confident in their roles and gain the trust of the people.” wrote Mr Khaw.

Apart from stating that the new Prime Minister will be elected by PAP’s new leaders, he went on to state, “… if all goes well, they will make this choice by consensus.” and that the older ministers including PM Lee Hsien Loong will stay out of the deliberations. However, Mr Khaw does not mention what would be the decision process if things do not go as well as PAP would plan.

Mr Khaw noted that the new leader will also have to be elected into the PAP’s Central Executive Committee, and become the party’s secretary-general.

Referring to the examples brought up by Mr Han in his commentary, Mr Khaw pointed out: Australia has had five prime ministers in five years, with three of the four switches due to intra-party feuds. In the United States, the major parties choose their presidential nominees through a prolonged, prodigiously expensive and deeply divisive process. And in Britain, the Conservative Party has just had a brutal contest for a new leader, while the Labour Party is in the throes of yet another internecine struggle to determine the fate of its current leader.

He highlighted that Singapore is lucky to have had leadership cohesion over five decades, across three generations. “The shared sense of purpose among ministers, and the consciousness that becoming PM is a responsibility to be borne and not an ambition to be sought, means the ruling party is not riven by factions.”

Mr Khaw ended his letter in an interesting and contradicting note of his earlier statements by writing, “Why would we want to exchange this calm and rational process for periodic political bloodlettings that leave deep and lasting wounds, both within the party and the body politic?”

Mr Khaw earlier noted that the new PM will have to be elected into the CEC by the party cadre members, but why is then Mr Han’s suggestion of having a PM being elected by the party cadre members being rejected? If it is just plainly an election within the CEC members as documented for the process in which the first Prime Minister was elected via, why wouldn’t Mr Khaw just clarify as such.

He also noted that PM has to enjoy the support of the parliamentary party which is the cabinet members, who are the supposed new leaders of PAP. So would the PM be elected by the incoming cabinet? It probably might seem so, given that ST gave the headline, “Next PM will be picked by the young ministers”.

As Mr Khaw implied that “periodic political bloodlettings that leave deep lasting wounds” ought to be avoided in place for a calm and rational process. How then is the new ministers going to decide the upcoming PM without lobbying for support as seen in the case of late Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s struggle for political power with Ong Eng Guan? And given that the cabinet is appointed by PM himself/herself, wouldn’t it be a case of chicken and egg dilemma?

Unless of course, the next PM is already pre-determined by some opaque process.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

即日起生效 二赌场入场税涨50巴仙

圣淘沙名胜世界和滨海湾金沙赌场入场税即日起调涨50巴仙,即新加坡公民和永久居民的赌场入场税,将从原本的100元调涨至150元,一年的入场税则从2000元调涨至3000元。 内政部指出,有关的调涨于4月4日生效。 当局在检讨入场税时,也考虑了各种因素,包括了嗜赌情况、家庭收入的改变、其他赌场包括赌船和云顶等现有的收费,以及整体的经济情况。 当局在今年8月1日开始,也将收紧预付和启动入场税的措施,限制赌客只能在入场税有效期的最后六小时前,才能预付隔日的入场税。第二次的入场税也会在支付后六小时内,自动启动。 采取数种预防嗜赌措施 两座赌场于2010年先后运作,但是政府采取了数种措施预防嗜赌情况出现,包括设立入场税、入门次数限制、赌场广告和促销限制等。有关的措施成功在10年期间,控制了嗜赌情况,但是政府仍然坚持加强预防。 当局除了调涨入场税,社会与家庭发展部也会和业者密切合作,研究可限制嗜赌行为的科技,例如采用外国赌场设定花费预算的措施。 预防嗜赌理事会发文告指出,当局支持政府提高赌场入场税和采用赌客管理预算的行为,表示有关举措可以提高赌客对自己行为的意识和控制能力。 在赌场禁门法令下,截至去年共有6万7500人被拒于赌场之外。 二集团承诺投资90亿 另一方面,两个赌场的持有集团,云顶新加坡和拉斯维加斯金沙集团为了延长赌牌,向我国政府承诺进行总值90亿新元的非博彩投资。他们的赌牌获准延长至20130年。 政府表示,两座综合度假村扩建计划,预计将为我国制造5000个就业机会。…

Report: Singapore banks financed up to SG$1.9 billion to companies linked with haze-causing fires in Indonesia

Indonesia has just experienced yet another year of catastrophic fires that have…