TODAY Online published an article on 31 August saying that those who are not feeling well should just stay home to avoid transmitting diseases to co-workers.

In the report, a new working paper by the nonprofit National Bureau of Economic Research is quoted saying that people bring their infectious illness to work, it spreads, and when sick people don’t have a financial incentive to show up to work, fewer people get sick.

Dr Nicolas R. Ziebarth, an assistant professor at Cornell University and one of the study’s researchers, said, “You see people who are at the workplace sneezing and potentially infectious. That’s how diseases spread.”

“It’s good to change the culture of how people see each other. You can signal hard work in a lot of different ways. It’s not the right way to go into the office and spread diseases,” he added.

Despite all these findings, not all workers in Singapore agree with the statements, saying that they do not have any choice but to show up at work, even though they are not well.

  • Ow Jun Liang wrote, “But if you don’t come to work even if you are really sick, you will be condemned.”
  • Teddy Chung wrote, “Come to work & you will be a hazard to your colleagues. Don’t come to work & you will be a hazard to your boss. Tough decision.”
  • Umie Aishah wrote, “Sometimes cough last more than a few days….we can’t afford to be away from work too long & it depends on the type of work. Don’t make generalisation. Inconsiderate? How abt taking medical leave even though not sick or too sick…that colleagues have to cover your work? Is that considerate?”
  • Frank Chong wrote, “Bosses said:”Come to work sick or get replaced by foreigners.”
    “If you are sick, come to work and faint, not only you lose your job, you will be sued too because you got mc.”, “Sick? Come work spread to others i laggi more happy; replaced all of you, pay all goes back to starting pay.”, “What? People got pay even hospitalised? Are you minister?”, “MC? Unless your hands and legs chopped off by terrorists or else not valid no matter from which hospital.””
  • Haziq Evan Rosli wrote, “In Singapore, employers and doctors work hand in hand. Employers don’t like MCs and doctors are reluctant to give out MCs. And I checked with a coughing library staff. They are NOT ALLOWED to wear masks when coughing. NLB (National Library Board) so retarded.”
  • Lisa Foxx wrote, “SG employers dislike MC, so most will still turn up for work. Singapore doctors usually give no more than 1 day MC so next day still report for work and continue coughing.”
  • Sim Johan wrote, “I guess a lot of people don’t know .. If u take MC, more than 4 days within the first 6 financial months… You ended up getting “mark”..”
  • Kelvin Choo wrote, “Not applicable here. So please educate employers and HR.”
  • Ellson Yap wrote, “Taking more than 3 days of sick leaves, will result in no bonus. What you think?”
  • Simon Cheng wrote, “Tell that to my boss!!!”

Under the Employment Act, you are entitled to paid sick leave if:

  • You have served your employer for at least 3 months.
  • You have informed or tried to inform your employer within 48 hours of your absence.
  • Your sick leave is certified by the company’s doctor, company-approved doctor or a government doctor (including doctors and dentists from approved public medical institutions).

According to the Ministry of Manpower’s FAQ on sick leave, it noted that under the Employment Act, both employer and employee can terminate the contract at any time by giving due notice. This includes employees who are unwell.

MOM wrote that employers are encouraged to treat sick employees with compassion. And that employer’s decision to dismiss an employee should be based on documented poor performance or misconduct.

MOM also wrote that if you’re covered by the Employment Act and feel you’ve been terminated unfairly, or without just cause, you can appeal in writing to the Minister of Manpower. Whether MOM would take any action in regards to the appeal, is a totally other question by itself.

What do you think? Would you go to work if you are feeling unwell?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

94海外人士君悦酒店出席会议 返国后至少三人确诊患新冠

日前,一名马国男子与两名韩国男子在新加坡出席会议证实感染新型冠状病毒,根据卫生部昨日(5日)指出,该三宗确诊感染病例,是于1月20日至22日期间,在君悦酒店参加私人商务会议,其中共109名来自同公司参与,94名来自海外,而且均离开了新加坡。 卫生部 也指出,他们目前也已通知相关海外卫生当局。另外,有15名本国人参加会议,11人情况良好,4人则出现相关症状,目前已转入国家传染病中心(NCID)进行检测。 酒店经理库马尔(译音,Parveen Kumar)也表示,酒店在之前就已经接获卫生部通知,表明已有客人确诊,但并未透露患者的感染方式、地点与时间。随后也对公共区域、餐厅、会议室、客房等进行消毒,确保客人与员工的健康与安全。 邻国马来西亚卫生部于本月4日证实,马国41岁男子,于上月16日到新加坡出席会议,回国后出现症状,一周后即本月3日,获证实感染新型冠状病毒(武汉肺炎)。 紧接着韩国也出现两起相关确诊病例,同样于18日至24日期间前来新加坡参加国际会议,并与马国确诊患者曾密切接触,随后也立即前往就医,结果确诊自己也被感染。

HDB – A new boss and a new direction equal new policies?

Andy Soon/ Mr Khaw Boon Wan’s blog mentioned the young couples, divorcees…

That we may dream again – Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss

Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss talking about the read and blue pill.  Photo by Lawrence Chong…

五年前掉入下水道受伤 女子向公用事业局索偿500万元!

2015年12月1日,一名任职会计师的女子在经过西门路(Simon Road)时,在实龙岗上段的交界处不慎掉进一个无孔盖的下水道。 这一摔导致,导致她擦伤、脚踝骨折,一度住院五天,甚至于脊椎椎间盘突出,她无法跑步、腰部会出现间接性疼痛。若坐下超过1小时都会感到颈部疼痛。右手活动也因神经损伤受限制。 五年后,这名47岁女子陈慧萍(Chan Hui Peng译音),决定起诉公用事业局(PUB),索偿高达500万元!在庭上,她的代表律师指责该局需负起至少七成的责任,要求针对她所承受的痛苦、未来的医药费、失去生育能力、失去工作能力等等索偿。 女子也声称自己患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),有出现头痛、焦虑和恐慌的症状,还有重度抑郁症和精神分裂症。甚至于,对洞穴都感到恐惧而做噩梦。 公用事业局的辩护律师指出,当时现场有三名工作人员在检查下水道,女子接近洞口时却没有绕道而行;但女子也驳斥,自己并没有使用手机,却非常注意前方,也指下水道被树叶遮住,她只看到“一大片阴影”。 至于三名工作人员,女子称他们都穿便装,现场也没有树立告示牌。 辩护律师则指女子的陈述“不诚实”,也表示辩方心理专家会鉴定陈女士是否真的患有创伤后障碍。