TODAY Online published an article on 31 August saying that those who are not feeling well should just stay home to avoid transmitting diseases to co-workers.

In the report, a new working paper by the nonprofit National Bureau of Economic Research is quoted saying that people bring their infectious illness to work, it spreads, and when sick people don’t have a financial incentive to show up to work, fewer people get sick.

Dr Nicolas R. Ziebarth, an assistant professor at Cornell University and one of the study’s researchers, said, “You see people who are at the workplace sneezing and potentially infectious. That’s how diseases spread.”

“It’s good to change the culture of how people see each other. You can signal hard work in a lot of different ways. It’s not the right way to go into the office and spread diseases,” he added.

Despite all these findings, not all workers in Singapore agree with the statements, saying that they do not have any choice but to show up at work, even though they are not well.

  • Ow Jun Liang wrote, “But if you don’t come to work even if you are really sick, you will be condemned.”
  • Teddy Chung wrote, “Come to work & you will be a hazard to your colleagues. Don’t come to work & you will be a hazard to your boss. Tough decision.”
  • Umie Aishah wrote, “Sometimes cough last more than a few days….we can’t afford to be away from work too long & it depends on the type of work. Don’t make generalisation. Inconsiderate? How abt taking medical leave even though not sick or too sick…that colleagues have to cover your work? Is that considerate?”
  • Frank Chong wrote, “Bosses said:”Come to work sick or get replaced by foreigners.”
    “If you are sick, come to work and faint, not only you lose your job, you will be sued too because you got mc.”, “Sick? Come work spread to others i laggi more happy; replaced all of you, pay all goes back to starting pay.”, “What? People got pay even hospitalised? Are you minister?”, “MC? Unless your hands and legs chopped off by terrorists or else not valid no matter from which hospital.””
  • Haziq Evan Rosli wrote, “In Singapore, employers and doctors work hand in hand. Employers don’t like MCs and doctors are reluctant to give out MCs. And I checked with a coughing library staff. They are NOT ALLOWED to wear masks when coughing. NLB (National Library Board) so retarded.”
  • Lisa Foxx wrote, “SG employers dislike MC, so most will still turn up for work. Singapore doctors usually give no more than 1 day MC so next day still report for work and continue coughing.”
  • Sim Johan wrote, “I guess a lot of people don’t know .. If u take MC, more than 4 days within the first 6 financial months… You ended up getting “mark”..”
  • Kelvin Choo wrote, “Not applicable here. So please educate employers and HR.”
  • Ellson Yap wrote, “Taking more than 3 days of sick leaves, will result in no bonus. What you think?”
  • Simon Cheng wrote, “Tell that to my boss!!!”

Under the Employment Act, you are entitled to paid sick leave if:

  • You have served your employer for at least 3 months.
  • You have informed or tried to inform your employer within 48 hours of your absence.
  • Your sick leave is certified by the company’s doctor, company-approved doctor or a government doctor (including doctors and dentists from approved public medical institutions).

According to the Ministry of Manpower’s FAQ on sick leave, it noted that under the Employment Act, both employer and employee can terminate the contract at any time by giving due notice. This includes employees who are unwell.

MOM wrote that employers are encouraged to treat sick employees with compassion. And that employer’s decision to dismiss an employee should be based on documented poor performance or misconduct.

MOM also wrote that if you’re covered by the Employment Act and feel you’ve been terminated unfairly, or without just cause, you can appeal in writing to the Minister of Manpower. Whether MOM would take any action in regards to the appeal, is a totally other question by itself.

What do you think? Would you go to work if you are feeling unwell?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

四人出现武汉肺炎症状 约140国人滞留中国

领导跨部门工作小组对抗武汉肺炎疫情的部长黄循财指出,目前约有140名新加坡人受到武汉肺炎爆发影响而滞留在中国,当局正在寻找应对方法。另外,有四名新加坡人无法于上周登上飞机回国,其中三人出现了武汉肺炎的症状,一人已经住院。 他指出,并非所有140名新加坡人都受到感染,他们是因为其他原因,如不愿抛下另外一半,而选择滞留。 我国上周派出客机,将92名国人带回国,他们都受困在被中国当局实施封城的城市内。自上个月爆发武汉肺炎病症后,全球的死亡人数已经于周日达到362人,却大多数发生在中国的湖北省武汉市内。 因为伴侣而选择留下 在回应马西岭—油池集选区国会议员任梓铭提问有关滞留在中国的新加坡人时,黄循财指出,新加坡驻北京领事馆已经和140人取得联系,目前正和中国当局制定回国流程。 “我们相信目前还有约140名国人在武汉,大部分拥有其他国籍的伴侣,所以他们选择暂时留在中国或是回来,而我们都必须要作安排,因为与非国人结婚并非容易的事。” 他声明,目前工作小组并没有发现湖北省以外的新加坡人感染到病毒。“我们仍然和中国当局保持联系,以查看如何帮助想回乡的国人,我们也这些国人保持直接联系。” 指将染病者带上飞机不理智 义顺集选区议员林伟杰医生随后询问有关无法登机回国的四名新加坡人已经接受了那些医疗帮助,以及在任何情况下,是否能将出现症状的三名新加坡人带回国。“我希望政府和外交部能够更加努力,看看我们是否能够将他们带回国。” 对此,外交部长维文表示,就目前人们都可能是病菌传媒,且全球疫情不断蔓延的情况下,让他们登上商用机是非常“不明智”的。“拥有充分的医疗依据,中国当局才会做出有关的决定,即禁止他们上飞机。” “如果让他们登上飞机,不仅违反了他们自己的规矩,也违反了世界卫生组织的建议。因此,我们都对此(他们的行动)表示谅解。” 他也表示,他一直在监督着将国人带回家的工作,并且知晓有四人无法登机。他指出,中国当局一直“非常负责任,反应迅速且采取了一切必要的措施,照顾被滞留在当地的新加坡人。”…

【冠状病毒19】马国出现D614G变异毒株 传播速度快10倍!

根据马来西亚医药研究机构(IMR)发现,马国首次出现冠状病毒19变异毒株“D614G”,传播能力比一般毒株快10倍! 马国卫生总监诺希山,昨日(16日)在脸书发文指出,马国吉打州锡瓦沃加((Sivagangga))感染群中三例确诊,以及柔佛州武吉地南感染群的一例确诊,发现D614G变异毒株。 美国斯克里普斯研究所的病毒学家,最先在今年7月发现上述变异毒株,若出现超级传播者会更容易传播。 诺希山坦言,由于当前疫苗研究未包括变异毒株,当前研发中的疫苗可能无法有效应付。 他也提醒马国民众,随著病毒异变,马国社区恐出现“超级传播者”,呼吁当地民众警惕。  

MOM: Productivity declined for the first time in a decade

For the first time in at least 10 years, Singapore’s labour productivity…