photo: channelnewsasia

Seven scholarship recipients received their scholarships from Minister of Foreign Affairs Vivian Balakrishnan at the Foreign Service Scholarship Awards ceremony on Friday (Aug 19).

Of the seven recipients of the scholarship, four received the Public Service Commission (PSC) Scholarship, and three were awarded the Singapore Government Scholarship.

The scholars will be pursuing their studies in the United Kingdom, China, and Germany.

Mr Balakrishnan said in a speech at the awards ceremony, “Acceptance of the scholarships represents a commitment to serve the nation, and that the issue of breaking one’s bond obligations should not even be a consideration.”

“In that journey, if sometimes you have to compromise even your individual preferences, you have to wait out that bond period, and serve it as a matter of honor, please do so. This scholarship is not a transaction; this is a commitment to serve the nation.”

“It’s not just a recognition of your academic ability, it is a life-changing moment for you and your family,” Dr Balakrishnan said.

He also advised the scholarship recipients to pursue other interests outside of their studies.

He urged them to seize every opportunity to experience all they could expand their horizons, and to make friends from various backgrounds at school.

There were comments about the awards in CNA’s Facebook page on the speech of the Foreign Affairs Minister.

A commentator, Daryl Yeo said,

“The minister also touched on the significance of the award. ‘It’s not just a recognition of your academic ability; it is a life-changing moment for you and your family. And the opportunity from the Government to rule,’ Dr Balakrishnan said, likening the award to the Imperial examination system in ancient China.”

“No, Vivian, the Government does not rule its people. The Government serves its people,” Daryl Yeo said.

To this comment, the minister took the trouble to reply,

“Dary Yeo – you are right. The government is certainly supposed to serve our people. MediaCorp did not carry my full speech.”

He then pastes his speech of this quote in full

“Because it is not a transaction, it is not something that you sign off. It’s a life-changing moment for you and your family. Now having said that we are not imperial China. You are not signing on to rule over Singaporeans. We are public officials. We are civil servants, and the emphasis is on the word ‘servants’. So it is different.”

“But nevertheless, I hope you understand that you are actually making a commitment to serve this nation of ours and if in that journey, it means sometimes you will have to compromise even on your own individual preferences, sometimes you have to wait out that bond period and serve it as a matter of honour, please do so.”

“Ok this is not a transaction. This is a commitment to serve your nation. So that’s the first thing I wanted to tell you as someone who has gone through the system.”

And another commentator wrote,

“Most of those I know, especially those who break bond, see the scholarship as a personal achievement, a trophy. It is not a bursary (where it is given to needy and meritorious graduates), so they neither feel obliged nor committed to the nation at all.”

“Now many of these recipients are also from our elite families, who are more well-off. Since they see the scholarship as a personal thing, they also see paying money to break bond as fulfilling their personal desire to achieve higher personal attainment.”

“In their minds its like this: You sponsor me, I don’t want it anymore, I pay you back, so what is the problem?”

“In short, linking scholarships to ‘commitment’ is too far fetched based on the way our system works.”

True enough, Straits Times has earlier reported on 4 August about the speech by the Principal of Raffles Insitute saying that meritocracy is failing for the new generation of citizens.

He said, “Wealthier families have been able to give their children an edge through tuition and enrichment, leading to exams such as the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) no longer being “the level playing field that they once were”

Meaning those scholarships to even the odds for students with disadvantaged family backgrounds will likely to be disadvantaged to get that same award at the very start since the criteria of scholarship is solely based on academic achievement.

This is sort of the same scenario of giving a huge reward to Olympic medalist with no financial support at the very beginning.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Doctor imprisoned and fined for selling 25,765 bottles of cough medicine to drug addicts

A doctor was sentenced to two years imprisonment and S$130,000 fine for selling 25,765…

Is Tharman wrong about rainbow on day of Lee Kuan Yew’s funeral?

Speaking at a community event on Saturday, 8 August, Deputy Prime Minister…

男子站路中央疑恶作剧堵路 车主警告“我报警啊!”

这是迷路了吗?还是好玩呀?有人故意走到路中央,阻挡车子,车主鸣笛,甚至扬言要报警了。 网友Raven Qiu在脸书上分享小短片,只见一人似乎是在大清早走到组屋行人道上,然后就停止不走了。要前进的车子被阻拦,车主鸣笛,以中英文警告男子“不要玩车”,否则他将报警。 Raven Qiu在短片下写到,站在路中央的男子或许是因为生活压力,而感到迷茫才作出有关行为,也或许他是真的迷路。 网民们的评论中,也有人认为男子或许是早起后有些迷糊,“GPS(导航)没正常运作啦”。 有的网民关注点则偏离了,甚至询问男子到底是穿裙子,还是他的T恤太长了。

刘浩典:从新冠疫情危机,新加坡能吸取什么教训?

李光耀公共政策研究院前副院长刘浩典教授,本月16日在《南华早报》发表评论。他认为新加坡政府做了三个重要、且事后看来是错误的决策。但他也希望经此一疫,新加坡能摒弃掉多年来我们当中的许多人都表现出的——自以为是,傲慢自大,和很强的自我优越感。 首个错误决策,是因为初步评估判断冠状病毒19严重程度更接近猪流感(或H1N1),而不是SARS,这使得政府决定不关闭学校、停工停业。 其二,倡导人民不戴口罩。其三是尽管客工亦重组织已警告,客工宿舍拥挤环境恐成为防疫弱点,但当局未采取强制性、果断措施来管理。 刘浩典相信新加坡仍将挺过这场危机,感染人数成千上万,但死亡率应很低,再者政府已积极进行检测。 “我更担心的是,新加坡人会从这场危机中吸取错误的教训。” 他指出,尽管人民行动党不反对多样化观点和持不同政见者,不过坚持危机中人们应团结支持当局,异议争辩且暂时搁置。 但这种观点只对了一部分。危机中决策者面临的最大认知威胁不是缺乏团结,而是困在危机太久而产生狭隘视野。 “此外,面对一个前所未有、完全不熟悉的威胁时,我们现存的经验和机制可能都不足以应对,这使得政府倡导多元化变得更为重要,或者至少要对各种异议保持开放的心态。” 正如武汉的李文亮医生在去世前曾说:“一个健康的社会不该只有一个声音。”事实证明,那些一直呼吁政府为外籍劳工改善恶劣生活环境的人是正确的。他们就如李文亮医生一样,扮演着吹哨人的角色,尽管他们的观点不见得获得广泛认可。 以下为转载自香港科技大学微信号的中文版译文: 过去三个月内由于疫情原因,我一直在香港,这给我一个非常难得的机会从外部观察新加坡,观察一贯表现出色的新加坡政府如何在抑制新冠病毒传播的战役中挣扎,尤其是对众多低收入劳工居住(现已封闭隔离)的宿舍疫情防控的失败。新加坡人民行动党(PAP)政府应该为日益严峻的疫情承担什么责任? 到目前为止,很明显,新加坡政府做了三个重要的、且事后看来是错误的决策(包括不作为的决策)。…