Bukit Panjang LRT ( Source : blog.smrt.com.sg)

SMRT has just issued its response in regards to a passenger’s experience involving a run-away light-rail train at Bukit Panjang LRT line (BPLRT) that sped past three stations on Thursday last week (28 July).

Ms Jacqueline Bong had earlier shared with TOC on how the train that she and her friend at Sengar station,  sped past three stations without stopping, failing to respond to the emergency button and how the train was stopped only after a female passenger managed to get to the control station via her mobile phone.

Read: LRT sped past three stations non-stop with passengers at Bukit Panjang LRT line

Ms Bong wrote a letter to SMRT and subsequently posted the same message on SMRT’s Facebook page after being told that she will only be contacted 7 days later.

In her letter, she recounted the incident and asked the following questions:

  1. Why is the emergency button not working?
  2. Why no one notices the train moving non-stop till 4th station?
  3. Why was the emergency phone also not working at that moment?
  4. Why the train moved non-stop with much faster speed as usual?
  5. How frequent SMRT checks the emergency button and phone to ensure its functionality?

She also wrote that everyone were so scared especially when they saw another train ahead and that they can’t imagine what will happen if they couldn’t get the train to stop.

In its Facebook clarification on the incident, SMRT wrote that the BPLRT train skipped Jelapang station at 11.51 am due to a fault on the train’s antenna that ensures trains stop accurately at each station. The train was hence not able to pick up the signal to stop at the next three stations.

It said that it has confirmed that the train did not exceed 55 km per hour during this incident and assured commuters that BPLRT trains operate at a speed range of 30 – 55 km per hour depending on the gradient and turn of each section of the BPLRT network. It also added that the system is also equipped with an independent Automatic Train Protection System that ensures safe separation between trains.

Ms Bong had recounted in her experience that when her friend failed to stop the train by pressing the emergency button, she went to the other side of the cabin to press the emergency button with all her might but the train still did not stop.

In regards to Ms Bong’s account of pressing the emergency button, SMRT clarified that the button can only be activated when a train comes to a complete stop at a station, to prevent it from moving off again.

However, Ms Bong feels that SMRT’s explanation is nonsensical as the button clearly had written emergency stop button.

SMRT noted that its BPLRT Operations Control Centre (OCC) received separate alerts from commuters through the station intercom, the train’s emergency phone and through the OCC hotline.

It went on to state that an automatic alert is immediately triggered to the OCC when either the station intercom or the train’s emergency phone is used. When its OCC responded to the call from the station intercom, the call from the train’s emergency phone was put on queue. It noted that its OCC also received a call from a commuter’s mobile phone at the same time. When the OCC subsequently responded to the call from the train’s emergency phone, no response was received.

TOC asked Ms Bong for clarification on the matter and according to her recollection, there had been no attempts to reach the passengers.

SMRT wrote that its OCC imposed a speed code restriction, which allowed the train to stop before the Phoenix station and said that its staff boarded the train and drove it to Phoenix station where commuters alighted safely at the platform.

This is contrary to what Ms Bong recall, as there had been no SMRT staff at the station awaiting their arrival or to check on the status of the passengers.

The train was later withdrawn to the depot for further checks.

When asked if SMRT had answered her questions, Ms Bong said, “What can I do if it doesn’t answer my questions?”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】李亚妹安老院86岁老妇逝世 4月10日增198确诊

昨日(10日)卫生部证实,再有一名来自李亚妹安老院的确诊86岁本地女公民,不敌病魔逝世。 根据资料,该名老妇是在本月1日被送往国家传染病中心,同日确诊。她是第987例病例,在本月9日因并发症逝世。 她也是来自李亚妹安老院第二位病逝的确诊病患。早前在本月3日,该安老院一名86岁确诊老妇逝世。同时,本地累计死亡病例已达到七起。 本月10日本地新增多达198例确诊病例,累计确诊已达到2千108例。而昨日没有入境病例,都是本地确诊病例,其中有79例都和客工宿舍感染群有关联。 同时,有两名来自陈笃生医院的女医生,和一名在后港综合诊所任职的病患服务人员确诊,年龄分别26至35岁。 而本地新增三感染群,分别是双溪加株道 (Sungei Kadut Ave)31号的客工宿舍(14例)、 移民与关卡局大厦(五例)和国大医院的一个装修工地(四例)。 本地昨日再有32例病患治愈出院,累计治愈出院492例。不过,多达875例仍留院治疗,大多情况稳定或有起色。其中32病重病患需待在加护病房。至于734例康复良好惟冠毒测试仍呈阳性反应的病患,则转移到本地的社区隔离设施。

Gas supply from Indonesia to Singapore will cease by 2023

By 2023, Indonesia’s Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry is looking to stop…

52-year-old man arrested on suspicion of vandalism in the State Court

A room at the pre-trial conference centre on the mezzanine floor of…