Photo from Minister Tan’s Facebook page.

Minister Tan Chuan-Jin hits back at reports about him and his grassroots leaders being given special clearance at Tuas Immigration Checkpoint on Jul 17, and said that it is unfortunate that MP for Hougang, Mr Png Eng Huat and his colleagues chose to politicise the issue.

The Minister for Social and Family Development said in a Facebook posting on July 19 that he joined his residents on a one-day durian trip to JB on Sunday as well as to make an official visit to the Deputy Home Affairs Minister’s Hari Raya Open House. He added that he travelled by bus so that he could be with his residents and volunteers during the trip.

Just yesterday, Mr Png noted in his Facebook post that a counter was opened specially for Minister Tan who was also in Malaysia to join his residents for a tour. He added that while most people in the queue probably did not mind the counter being specially opened for Minister Tan as being a Minister does come with privileges, it is somewhat unacceptable that an entourage of grassroots leaders and members with shopping bags in tow also enjoyed the privilege of fast clearance at the custom without needing to join the crowd.

Mr Png noted that no one else from the other queues could use that specially opened counter.

Just this morning, Immigration and Checkpoint Authority (ICA) confirmed Mr Png’s recollection of events and clarified matters from its perspective via a post on its Facebook fanpage.

In his explanation of why the grassroots leaders were allowed to use the special clearance counter, Minsiter Tan wrote, “Mr Png seems to accept that it’s reasonable that our office holders get facilitated, if so, then surely the others in that bus need to be cleared as well so that the bus can leave and not add to the vehicular queues there.”

Minister Tan slammed Mr Png in his posting by saying, “But the purpose of his post, and that of his compatriots, was clear. It was not about the old folks. It was aimed at stirring hate and anger, not only to be directed at me, which I can understand politically, but also at my residents and volunteers (who organised as well as helped guide each bus), as well as our officers who secure our borders. It’s unfortunate that he and his colleagues chose to politicise the issue.”

Mr Tan had kept silent about Mr Png’s posting till ICA released their version of what had happened.

Below is Minister Tan’s clarification and comments in full

I joined my residents on a one-day durian trip to JB on Sunday as well as to make an official visit to the Deputy Home Affairs Minister’s Hari Raya Open House. It was a good visit as we discussed a range of issues including security concerns we all faced.

I travelled by bus so that I could be with my residents and volunteers during the trip. It is not easy to plan for and organize these trips, especially when there are so many people and when our residents visited various locations. But our grassroots leaders did a great job and it was a meaningful experience for most, if not all our residents.

At day’s end, I bid farewell to every resident and sent them off after dinner. One by one we dispatched the 20 buses as they proceeded independently back to the different alighting points, so that residents didn’t have to commute too far to get home. We tracked the progress with the respective bus ICs.

On the return journey, ICA facilitated the clearance for me and my security officers who were carrying their firearms, as well as the residents and volunteers who were with me on my bus.

Our ICA officers do not have an easy responsibility. Cross border traffic at the causeway is one of the highest in the world. They have to maintain security while also trying to ensure a smooth flow of people entering and departing daily. I know because I too have been in the queues when on personal trips.

I had the impression Mr Png waited a very long time. He also lamented about old folks having difficulties in the queues. ICA checked their cameras to ascertain the waiting time. He carefully omits to mention that he waited for all of 30 mins. I actually bumped into Louis Ng too. He and his delegation were also in the queue for about half an hour or so.

Mr Png seems to accept that it’s reasonable that our office holders get facilitated, if so, then surely the others in that bus need to be cleared as well so that the bus can leave and not add to the vehicular queues there.

But the purpose of his post, and that of his compatriots, was clear. It was not about the old folks. It was aimed at stirring hate and anger, not only to be directed at me, which I can understand politically, but also at my residents and volunteers (who organised as well as helped guide each bus), as well as our officers who secure our borders. It’s unfortunate that he and his colleagues chose to politicise the issue.

Mr Png knows that it is standard procedure, all around the world, that Ministers, both from the home country and from visiting countries, get facilitated through immigration. When our Ministers visit overseas officially, they get facilitated, and likewise when Ministers from overseas visit us, they also get facilitated.

And oh, by the way, any traveler who requires special assistance can approach our ICA officers on duty. I believe it is more effective and real to assist our fellow Singaporeans in this way.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

LTA: Replacement of the current ERP system to begin in 2023, new IU unit installation in 2021

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) had announced earlier today (8 September) the…

受收入和负债水平影响 六成国人未充分准备退休生活

调查发现,六成国人没有为退休生活做足准备,对舒适晚年生活不抱太大期许。 数字财务管理公司赛芙(Syfe)进行一个民调时,发现大多数国人多处于退休准备最高或最低水平。 贷公司于周三(4日)发布调查结果时指出,有关调查指数是根据1000名,年龄介于25只60岁国人对退休生活的方式和需求,目前收入、累积储蓄、储蓄率以及投资,还有资产权来进行计算。 有关的计算分数将分四个级别来衡量退休准备程度,即高、足够、低或非常低。 然而,此调查结果或许反映了国人收入差距的扩大,因为发现10人中有四人没有真正为退休做准备,只有将近三人准备有充分准备,而他们就占了总数的有66巴仙。 调查报告指出,大多数国人陷入退休生活准备就绪的两个极端,这可能是收入差距扩大所致,并可能加剧未来的不平等退休生活情况。 报告还指出,整体上,有60巴仙的国人没有做好退休的充分准备,69巴仙的人认为他们无法享受舒适的退休生活。 这并非首次有调查显示国人并未做好退休准备。 华侨银行曾在7今年7月的金融健康指数中发现,大部分国人不确定如何透过投资和储蓄资金来增加财富。 年轻一代负担少较易储蓄 然而,这似乎不适用于千禧一代。 在Syfe调查报告中,年龄介于25至34岁的人们,在保持储蓄率和较低的债务水平情况下,这群体的人们将可享有舒适的退休生活。…

Kim Jong-un’s half-brother takes refuge in S’pore and Malaysia

Kim Jong-nam, the elder half-brother of North Korean supreme leader Kim Jong-un,…

林鼎宣布新党”人民之声“正式成立 国人55岁提取公积金成首要目标

团结党前秘书长林鼎,宣布新政党“人民之声”(Peoples Voice)正式成立。 成为“人民之声”党领袖的林鼎录制视频,在社交媒体向公众宣布新政党正式启航,准备大展拳脚为国家带来社会正义和真正的民主。 他声称,新政党的成立,并不只是为了改进制度或制衡人民行动党而已,而是放眼终结掉已长期忽视人民的行动党政权。 “新政党要改变现状,透过执政来改革国家,恢复我国作为本区域领袖的荣耀。“ 他认为,行动党留下的乱局并非无法解决,而让国民在55岁可以提取公积金储蓄,成为该党首要目标。此举保障年长退休者的晚年收入来源、改善我国经济。 抨击行动党提空洞计划 忽视国民公积金权益 ”我对政府持续忽视国人对自身公积金储蓄权益,感到十分失望。透过的”默迪卡一代“、自愿提早重建(VERS)计划等空洞配套,对民众施予小恩小惠,不该是政府做的。公积金是你我的储蓄,我必须确保大家在55岁,能领取自己的公积金储蓄。“ 其二,阻止消费税再起两巴仙,同时对于日常必需品如食物、奶粉,书本、纸尿片和儿童衣物等征收零消费税。他认为,应该向富人征税,而不是穷人。”我们为富有一群提供太多的优惠和漏洞,要让更有需要的低收入群体喘口气,而不是一巴仙群体。“ 其三,推动民选总统制。人民投选总统的权利不久前被剥夺,没有选民为去年委任的总统投下一张选票。”我会召开公投,询问民众是否要废除现有的委任总统制,并且投选出人民选出来的总统?“ 他也认为,人民不只是每五年才有机会投票表决,新加坡人民教育水平高,科技技术先进,理应能透过网络、线上方式参与公投,对最关乎他们的施政课题投票表决。…