Zulfikar Shariff is a name that is anything but new as far as the news in concerned. His first brush with the authorities came more than a decade ago when he instigated a group of Muslim Primary School girls to don the hijab – the Muslim headdress – to school.

From then till his arrest, in addition to his numerous antics and bursts of demagoguery, he also has been a regular writer to public forums.

In fact, even up till 3 months ago, he still wrote an op-ed and letters which were published by The Straits Times and TODAY.

The timing of the decision to publish his letters is important in light of the fact many of his contentious postings which he was arrested for were from 2014.

Zulfikar's letter to the Straits Times which was published in May this year, almost 2 years after his posts in support of ISIS
Zulfikar’s op-ed in the Straits Times which was published in May this year, almost 2 years after his posts in support of ISIS

His letter to ST in support of Duterte’s ‘tough talk’ contained praise for the President’s friendliness towards the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) – a violent Islamist outfit.

“While his extending the olive branch to the CPP and MILF is a positive start, Mr Duterte still needs to convince his administration that lasting peace is the best hope for the country. And hope that the CPP and MILF keep to their end of the deal.”

In his letter to TODAY, which was also published in May this year, he decried ‘Institutional Racism’. For someone who argues that Muslims should take up arms against the ‘oppressors’, he does make a deceivingly decent argument for ‘the need for conversations.’

When a society believes it is acceptable to discriminate against a group on the basis of race, or makes excuses for such behaviour, then racism has been internalised and institutionalised.

If anecdotal evidence from the past few months points to institutionalised racism, then to mature as a society, it is truly time to have these conversations.

In addition to his letters to the Straits Times and TODAY, his letters have also been published by the website of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP).

As Mr Bhavan Jaiparagas, a former AFP Journalist puts it,

A bigger question: what if you’re the editor of a national newspaper which just months ago published an op-ed by said ISIL sympathiser? Do you quietly scrub the piece from your digital archive, or come clean on why you commissioned/published the piece?…

Apart from ST, the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) also posted a writing from Zulfikar. Zulfikar had written a response to a reporter to reject the term, fugitive used to describe him.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Bringing a little bit of reality to debate on the death penalty

NOTE: The writer is a founding member of We Believe in Second…

The childcare teacher – not your high-class maid (Part 2)

Rachel Zeng looks at the perceived role of childcare teachers in S’pore.

徐顺全质疑为何仍举办乐龄晚宴 穆仁理:已采取防疫措施,欢迎审查

早前,新加坡民主党秘书长徐顺全质疑,为何疫情当前,武吉巴督活跃乐龄委员会仍于3月7日举办晚宴?对此该区议员穆仁理反驳,有关乐龄晚宴已采取防疫措施,甚至欢迎各界的“检视”;他也认为把政府后来才宣布的新对策,算在之前的活动是“有欠公平”的。 穆仁里于周日晚间向《今日报》透露,针对日前武吉巴督的老年人晚宴,如果对此有任何质疑,也欢迎对此审查,以了解当时的情况,再判断晚宴的合理性。 该晚宴于3月7日举办,旨在庆祝活跃乐龄俱乐部成立八周年。 卫生部是早前宣布自11日起,暂停政府机构所为老年人举办的活动14天,同时也呼吁自3月13日起,取消或推迟有250人以上的活动。 徐顺全则质疑,为何在“最危急”的时刻,穆仁里仍与需一群老年人聚集。根据当天晚宴的照片,会员之间的距离相当靠近,有违公共卫生的措施—即实施“社会疏离”(social distancing),减少人群接触,保护个人免受感染。 “显然,穆仁里仍无法从2月份爆发的SAFRA 晚宴中获得教训”,徐顺全表示。 徐顺全表示,穆仁里身为该区的领袖,应该建议主办单位取消此次活动,因为一旦发生爆发,当地的居民很有可能会有感染风险。 对于徐顺全的批评,穆仁理则回应,他与委员会主席沟通,晚宴当天于晚间7点在社区俱乐部举办,同时也向他确认有关防疫措施,以及在在SAFRA晚宴后为何仍持续举办的原因,据了解,当天有300人出席。 “询问出席者是否到过裕廊SAFRA 晚宴”?…

Apologies and affirmation: Archbishop on LGBT issues

Archbishop William Goh has issued another statement to apologies for and clarify…