Tuas Checkpoint / photo by YX Lee

Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) confirms Minister Tan Chuan-Jin and his entourage of grassroots leaders and members were cleared through the customs with expedited clearance via a counter specially opened by its officers.

Member of Parliament for Hougang SMC, Png Eng Huat had posted on his Facebook yesterday about his experience at the Tuas Immigration Checkpoint on Saturday after a 1-Day Desaru Tour.

He noted that a counter was opened specially for Minister of Social and Family Development, Tan Chuan-Jin who was also in Malaysia to join his residents for a tour.

Mr Png wrote that while most people in the queue probably did not mind the counter being specially opened for Minister Tan as being a Minister does come with privileges. But what is somewhat unacceptable is that an entourage of grassroots leaders and members with shopping bags in tow also enjoyed the privilege of fast clearance at the custom without needing to join the crowd. He noted that no one else from the other queues could use that specially opened counter.

ICA confirmed Mr Png’s recollection of events and clarified matters from its perspective via a post on its Facebook fanpage this morning.

ICA noted that Minister Tan was travelling with 20 bus loads of people, who were his residents and grassroots leaders on July 17. And that he along with his security officers and the other passengers in his bus were given clearance at the Tuas Immigration Checkpoint, without having to queue, at around 9.20pm.

It added that the passengers in the other 19 buses (who were with Minister Tan) were cleared through the normal channels who had to join the queue.

ICA then wrote that its records showed Mr Png was there at the checkpoint for about 30 minutes, and was cleared through immigration.

It clarified that it is normal practice for ICA to give expedited clearance to Ministers, on both sides of the Causeway as well as members of the Malaysian royalty. Where they travel with others in a group, ICA officers will use their judgment on the clearance process.

Minister Tan has yet to comment publicly on this revelation, no photos of his trip is available online as well.

Many commenters turned up at the ICA’s Facebook post to say that there was nothing wrong and that Mr Png was just jealous that he and his residents were not given the same treatment.

One such comment by HuiLin Heng wrote,

“If people in his bus don’t get cleared at the same time, what’s the point of giving him expedited clearance? He might as well be sitting duck at the queue too!
Don’t be mean spirited for the sake of being so.”

Ivan Tan wrote,

Somebody did not receive the Royal treatment
That why got jealous
Ahhh the Grapes is sooooo sour !!!!!!

However, there are some who voiced concerns over how grassroots leaders were given expedited clearance at the custom.

Shawn Graphy wrote,

“So it means ICA has the ability to open more counters to benefit the general public and speedup waiting time but they choose to close it and only allow VIP and their 1 bus load to go thru? Huh? Who are the tax masters do you know? Is this ownself check ownself.”

JH Melvin wrote on ICA’s Facebook post,

“I think if we have a government institution that makes decisions like a PAP branch more than a stat board, that speaks volumes of the values this country has gone to.

Giving special clearance to minister is *different* from giving to both minister and grassroots leaders.”

Another commenter, Tan Simin wrote in ICA’s post that Mr Png’s post raises other issues.

“…Both Singapore-Malaysia land crossings can be incredibly crowded during peak hours, even if clearance is processed smoothly. In the case of elderly/injured individuals, as in the case with two in Mr Png’s party, does ICA have SOPs in place to expedite clearance to minimize discomfort or distress for such individuals?”

Mr Png had also written in his post that there were many travellers in the long queue who had to wait patiently for hours for their turn at the immigration checkpoint on July 17, some of whom are old and tired.

He added that one of his residents is 89 years old and another was injured during the tour.

He wrote, “If these two elderly residents can wait in queue patiently for their turns, so can all my volunteers and grassroots members. After all, we are supposed to enjoy a day of fun TOGETHER. No one should not be accorded more ‘fun’.”

Mr Png added in his post, “The chaos, anger and confusion at the Tuas Immigration checkpoint certainly made us forget how bad the durians were yesterday, and how bad the system needs to change.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

推广恐怖主义而被扣押四年 男子持双重国籍面控

因推广恐怖主义而被扣押了四年的49岁男子,因隐瞒了持有双重国籍的身份,今天被控上庭。 被告Zulfikar bin Mohamed Shariff,自2016年7月在内安法令下被拘留至今。据资料显示,他积极在网上推广有关恐怖主义和恐怖组织伊斯兰国(ISIS),包括劝诫其他穆斯林拒绝世俗、宪政和民主制度的国家,相信应该以暴力纠正而改为伊斯兰国教法。 最少两名国人受影响成为激进分子,其中一人,Muhammad Shamin Bin Mohamed Sidik已在内安法令下被逮捕和拘留。 根据内政部文告指出,被告于2002年和家人旅居澳大利亚,当时就已经持有新加坡和澳洲的双重国籍。他回到我国被逮捕后,受到内政部安全局和移民与关卡局调查时,隐瞒了澳洲国籍,只承认持有新加坡国籍。 被告也承认为了不失去双重国籍的身份,他在2013年更新新加坡护照时,并没有对移民与关卡局坦承持有其他国家的公民权。…

不同意纪律审裁庭报告 林学芬:将在公堂力争之

去年初,总检察署投诉李显扬妻子林学芬专业行为失当,向新加坡律师公会提呈逾500页的投诉信。 纪律审裁庭去年7月举行五天聆讯,最终发表报告,裁定林学芬在处理建国总理李光耀遗嘱上失当,违反律师专业法令,并要求将她除名。 《海峡时报》星期刊报导引述审裁庭对林学芬妻子措辞严厉的批评,指责后者“不诚实,试图将证据形塑成自己是无辜受害者的形象”,以及“李显扬的行为也同样欺瞒。” 对此,李玮玲在今早(23日)于脸书发文,直言上述审裁庭的裁决“拙劣”(travesty)。 至于李显扬本身则在今晚发文,转述妻子林学芬对此事表达的的评述: “我不同意审裁庭的报告,届时在公堂审理时必将力争之。群众都能透过律师公会获取有关闭门审裁庭审讯的完整记录。我呼吁群众仔细审视之,以达致他们对此事的独立结论。” 我的律师,Kenneth Tan高级律师、温长明高级律师,以及Providence Law事务所,呈现了出色的辩护。我非常感谢他们。”

MOM urges domestic helpers to stay at home during Phase 1 of circuit breaker exit strategy

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said on Thursday (21 May) that migrant…

MOH: 14 public transport staff infected with COVID-19, none has passed the virus to commuters

The Ministry of Health (MOH) stated on Thursday (18 June) that 14…