Security measures of banks in Singapore have to be enhanced, urged the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), following the bank robbery at Holland Village on Thursday (July 7)

Read : Robbery in Holland Avenue, the first since 2008

A MAS spokesman said on Saturday that the measures could include adding more security personnel and deploying CCTV surveillance and alarm systems. However, MAS stopped short of detailing a thorough guideline of bank security.

The robber left the bank with $30,000 after passing a note to the teller stating that he “had a weapon” and listing down his demands. There was no security guard in the bank. One has since been stationed there.

The robber is said to be a Caucasian man whose identity remains unknown with no photos of him circulated in the public domain.

Photo credit: Minh Truong Truong

A Standard Chartered spokesman stated after the incident that the teller who handed over the money did the right thing by acting in the “best interests” of the costumers and employees.

The last robbery in Singapore took place in November 10, 2008. A man named Ismail Shaikh Ahmad robbed the United Overseas Bank at City Plaza. Ismail was 45 years old at that moment. He went into the bank, dressed in a woman’s dress. He threatened to explode the bomb using the mobile phone that he carried in a paper bag if the bank does not fulfill his demand. But he failed because the security tackled him down and got arrested.

Another robbery took place in December 10, 2004 where a bank robber walked into the West Coast POSB branch with a wooden plank, took a customer service officer hostage with a fruit knife and was given $37,000 in cash by the bank employees. After getting the money on hand, he ran and locked the individuals present at the branch by jamming the wooden plank against the door. No security was present at the bank branch. Till today, the armed robber is still at large.

A person convicted of robbery will be subjected to imprisonment for a term of not less than 2 years and not more than 10 years and shall also be punished with caning with not less than 6 strokes. If the robbery is committed after 7 pm and before 7 am, the offender shall be punished with imprisonment for a term of not less than 3 years and not more than 14 years and shall also be punished with caning with not less than 12 strokes.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PV’s Leong Sze Hian wants to improve transparency and accountability in Parliament

Leong Sze Hian, a member of People’s Voice (PV) and its candidate…

香港占中九子被控妨扰罪成 朱耀明牧师《敲钟者言》盼唤醒人们良知

转载自:雅虎香港新闻 “如果我仍有气力,必继续在教会敲钟,在世上敲钟,在人心敲钟。” 2014年,香港爆发超过70添的占领行动,被指是“占领中环”运动发起人的戴耀廷、陈健民及朱耀明,以及另外6名参与人士,被控串谋作出公众妨扰、煽惑他人作出公众妨扰及煽惑他人煽惑公众妨扰等罪。 在上周二(4月9日),“占中九子”就9人就不同控罪被裁定罪名成立。 据香港独立媒体报导,案中第三被告、75岁的朱耀明牧师,在判决后的法庭求情时,表示对于行动“不后悔、没有遗憾、愤怒和不会放弃”,令旁听席多为民众流泪。 朱耀明:问题来自屈膝强权下的“公民从命” 他指出,也许许多人以为,香港的问题源于“公民抗命”,但其实是来自“公民从命”,这种从命,屈膝于强权和独裁者的政体下,结果卷入死伤无数的战争、或是无数人对贫穷、愚昧、战祸和残暴无动于衷;监牢里只是小奸小恶的罪犯,大奸大恶者反倒成了国家的领袖。 在被告栏上,他回顾一生走过的香港民主运动历程,但他谦卑地说,在雨伞运动中,自己只是一个敲钟者,希望发出警号,让人们直到不幸和灾难正在发生,期盼能唤醒人们良知,共挽狂澜。 以下为朱耀明《敲钟者言– 被告栏的陈辞》全文: 作为一个终生为上主所用,矢志与弱势者和穷苦人同行,祈求彰显上主公义,实践天国在人间,传颂爱与和平福音的牧师,垂老之年,满头白发,站在法庭被告栏,以待罪之身作最后的陈辞,看似极其荒谬和讽刺,甚至被视为神职人员的羞辱! 然而,此时此刻,在我心中,在法庭的被告栏,是一生牧职最崇高的讲坛,死荫的幽谷成就了灵性的高峰。…