A police report has been filed against pro-People’s Action Party (PAP) fanpage, Fabrication about the PAP (FAP) for alleging violating the Parliamentary Election Act (PEA) by posting posts on its fanpage that promotes the PAP candidate of the Bukit Batok By-Election during the Polling Day.

Augustine Lee Zixu wrote that he filed the police report on 13 June against FAP for the Facebook posts made on Polling Day. after receiving no reply from the Election Department (ELD) since 30 May.

FAP polling day

In his report, Augustine wrote,

I saw a posting on facebook on 27 May 2016 that show evidence that a political fan group Facebook page called “Fabrications About the PAP (FAP)” posted campaigning message to support the candidate Murali. The date and time of the post is 7 May 2016 5:20pm

It says “Vote Murali because he’s working for you. Not because you are part of a political journey.” https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10207565857199098&set=p.10207565857199098&type=3&theater

This post has since been deleted from FAP.

In addition, FAP apparently made another post, also on 7 May, Polling Day, which constitutes election advertising. I refer to the report from this blog: https://andrewlohhp.wordpress.com/2016/06/07/why-is-election-department-silent-on-pro-pap-facebook-pages-post-on-polling-day/

The post shows a quotation from Dr Tan Cheng Bock which criticises one of the candidates in the by-election, Dr Chee Soon Juan.

This post has also since been deleted.

However, according to ELD’s way of interpretation, these posts were clearly in breach of the rule against election advertising on Polling Day.

As FAP has 84,939 likes on Facebook, this is a serious breach of election advertising rules. It is the same breach for which Teo Soh Lung and Roy Ngerng are being investigated.

FAP being a political interest group openly transmit their political view has more political influence compared to individuals’ transmission. The election rules states that “The transmission of personal political views by individuals to other individuals, on a non-commercial basis, using the Internet, telephone or electronic means;”

Please take the necessary actions against all the admins of FAP, one known author of FAP is Jason Chua:

According to the above-linked Straits Times report on 16 Sept 2011, Jason Chua is the creator of FAP and is a 46-year-old who used to work as a software engineer.”

Till today, Augustine has yet to hear from the Singapore Police in regards to his police report.

On 31 May, Roy Ngerng Yiling and Teo Soh Lung were extensively investigated for their alleged offence for posting posts on their Facebook account during the recent Bukit Batok By-election Cooling Off Day and had their homes raided with no search warrant. This was just days after ELD filed police reports against the two individuals on 27 May.

Apart from the police report on FAP, another individual, Teng Yong Ping made a police report against the PAP team at Nee Soon GRC on 29 May about alleged breach of election advertising rules during General Election 2015 and in the Bukit Batok by-election. He had previously written to ELD about these breaches and has yet to receive a reply. TOC had also written to ELD about the breaches during the General Election but no reply has been received till date.

The two jointly issued a statement, saying, “We hope that the police will treat all violators of the law in a fair and equal manner. We have brought the above matters to their attention and ask that they take the necessary actions.”

Posting election advertising during Cooling-Off Day and prior to the closing of ballots of Polling Day is an offence under the Parliamentary Elections Act. A person found guilty of doing so may be fined up to $1,000, jailed for up to 12 months, or both.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Election Watch Part VIII – The Digital Warfare in Electoral Battle

The following is an excerpt of  article posted on March 9, 2011…

官媒有免责权吗?独立网站却因读者留言被对付

一名20岁青年因为在《亚洲新闻台》的留言,暗示想效仿对议员丢鸡蛋的澳洲“鸡蛋男孩”,对我国内政部长尚穆根“也这么做”,结果祸从口出,引来警方调查。 也许太过年轻?这名青年可能没想到,脸书留言的一句玩笑话,似乎引来“对领导大不敬”之嫌,警方更表示“认真看待威胁”,要对他和另一名评论者展开调查。 关心时政的李宁国就认为,既然留言者被调查,那么对于提供脸书平台,让这两人留言的亚洲新闻台,执法者又会采取什么行动? “这是否说明官方媒体就有免责权,无需对此负责?而其他网站如议论政策(论坛)、The Online Citizen 等非官方的FB,就得背負共谋的罪名?” 他对此质疑,警方又是否会调查亚洲新闻台,为何允许这两人留言继续留在脸书?部长不是曾说过,即便是平台管理者,因为允许、批准了这些不当留言,也要为此负责? 他拭目以待执法者的进一步行动。 总检察署认为《议》管理员需对成员贴文负责 在去年2月,作为本地华语时政群组的《议论政策论坛》,只因为其中一位成员篡改新闻标题,结果包括李宁国等五位群组管理员也遭“连坐”。 总检察署认为他们批准了、也没有删除有关不当贴文,造成贴文继续刊登下去,构成藐视法庭。群组管理员也要对他们的平台上的内容负责。他们虽然不是贴文作者,但他们不能免除责任。…

无缘角逐2019东运会留憾 苏睿勇批奥委会搞“小学生政治”

新加坡运动选手将在今年11月30日,赴菲律宾马尼拉出征2019年东南亚运动会,然而2015、2017年东运会马拉松冠军得主苏睿勇却无缘在这场体育盛事角逐金牌。 在昨日的文告中,新加坡国家奥林匹克委员会(SNOC)称,此次我国将派出585选手角逐49项目。不过名单中却没有苏睿勇。 奥委会指出,遴选委员会已审慎审核全国体育协会呈交的选手名单。 至于新加坡田径总会(SA)提名苏睿勇参加2019东运会,遭到遴选委员会驳回。 奥委会称,自2017年东运会以来,苏睿勇作为国家代表和青年运动员的典范,却表现出不符合该委会期望的态度和行为。 据《海峡时报》报导,虽然奥委会未明言苏的哪些行为令委会失望,但早在2017年吉隆坡的东运会前,苏睿勇曾因违反在社交媒体为个人赞助商宣传的规定,被奥委会警告;以及在吉隆坡赛事前,在比赛上镂洞,令赞助商2XU不满。 此外,苏睿勇也在4月1日收到来自奥委会的律师信函,要求他撤回有关2015年东运会马拉松赛的文章。但后来委会撤销对苏的诉讼。 他也指责新加坡奥委会在刘威延事件上,未有保持中立和没有做好调查,只听单方面目击者说辞。 此次奥委会的遴选委员会成员包括主席陈川仁(也是现任国会议长)、副主席Jessie Phua和Milan Kwee、财政Edwin Lee、马尼拉赛事主管Juliana…

Don't blindly trumpet achievements in standardised tests

The following is the  original letter of the one published in the…