By Ghui
As Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton battle it out at their respective nomination bids, all gloves are off, as attacks between the various candidates get personal. While the world watches, entertained and appalled in equal measure, a political game that is proving to be just as gripping is brewing in our own backyard – the Bukit Batok by-elections which see veteran opposition politician Dr. Chee Soon Juan pitted against Mr Murali Pillai from the incumbent PAP-led administration.
In the build up to an election in the midst of campaign fever, it would be expected for competing candidates to find new ways to persuade the electorate of why they are more electable than the competition. The most ethical way of so doing is to focus strictly on the merits of your own policies as opposed to character assassination. Obviously, this is much easier said than done as the line between mud slinging and acceptable self-promotion are often blurred. In the heat of debates, political tit for tad is unsurprising.
Like clockwork, a number of PAP stalwarts have stepped up to show their support for Mr Pillai by criticising Dr Chee. What has left me slightly disappointed is the degree to which such PAP members would go just to attack Dr Chee. Most of the criticisms have been focused on Dr Chee in his personal capacity as opposed to on his policies!
For instance, Mdm Halimah Yacob has publicly questioned Dr Chee’s values over the hyped up incident of Dr Chee shouting at then Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong. Personally, I think this is a cheap shot at Dr. Chee. Surely Mdm Haliman should have more worthy criticism against Dr. Chee than an incident that happened so many years ago! Particularly because defamation suits, which bankrupted Dr. Chee, were instituted over that alleged shouting incident. Even if that incident was an oversight on Dr Chee’s part, surely he has more than paid the price? Besides, many are not even convinced that what he did was that bad anyway.
Read more: Mdm Halimah Yacob’s speech gets lambasted by netizens for character assassination
In an election that is only called because of an MP that was caught with his pants down, it seems pretty rich for Mdm Halimah to be talking about values? Besides, has she forgotten the many insults that the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew once heaped on Dr. Chee?
Just as I thought it could not get pettier, enter PAP’s Grace Fu to give the term irony a whole new meaning by taking issue with Dr Chee’s employment status! If I am not mistaken, Dr. Chee’s employment record (or lack thereof) was caused in part by the incumbent government’s manifold lawsuits against Dr. Chee! (read more)
Perhaps Ms Fu’s intention was to paint Dr Chee as some sort of unemployed scrounger who lazes around aimlessly all day. In this she couldn’t be further from the truth. Dr. Chee has been active in politics against all odds. He has written numerous articles and books. He has played an ongoing role in the Singapore Democratic Party. Far from whiling his time away, Dr Chee has been meaningfully engaged in legitimate activity!
Besides, does Ms Fu not deem politicians as being gainfully employed? Was ex Labour Party leader Ed Milliband of Britain someone who did not hold a steady job too?
Despite all his set backs, Dr Chee has always doggedly bounced back. Whatever your political convictions may be, his devotion and fortitude is unquestionably admirable. Through the ups and downs of his political career, Dr. Chee would arguably have gained much experience, insight and empathy. To say that he is not a good choice as an MP because he lacks work experience, therefore lacks credibility and depth.
Instead of having incisive political debates on issues that affect Singapore, this election campaign has delved into the petty personal that detracts from what should really be examined!
Surely the PAP has better things to critique Dr Chee with?
To add even more pettiness into the campaign, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has also waded in and accused Dr. Chee of being racist on the account of some comments posted by some members of the public on Dr. Chee’s Facebook page. While I do not condone the contents of those comments, I do not think that it is fair to hold Dr. Chee responsible for comments that have not been made by him.
Read more – PM accuses Dr Chee of being a racist for failing to remove comments on his Facebook
He is busy on the campaign trail and does not have the support of an entire administration machine. In light of this, surely Dr. Chee can be forgiven for not having the time to comb through all of the comments on a daily basis. Perhaps PM Lee with a strong administration army behind him does not realise that most people do not have that degree of support!
The Bukit Batok residents deserve a better quality of election campaigning!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Nas Daily rebuts allegations made by founder of The Cacao Project, calls her project a “fake story”

Founder of Nas Daily Nuseir Yassin has released a new video on…

Can a gatekeeper innovate?

By Dr. Lai Kok Fung SingTel has just released its financial figures for…

自来水有班兰叶味? 公用事业局称仍可安全使用

本地一些家户居民反映,家中自来水煮沸后出现班兰叶的味道,不过公用事业局表示,初步调查显示这是水中有机化合物产生的异常味道。 而公用事业局发言人告知《海峡时报》,当局是接到来自巴西立、义顺和淡滨尼一带的居民反映,水中有轻微的班兰味。 当局从受影响住家和自来水管采样,实验室检测发现,水中含有微量,不到十亿分之十的四氢呋喃(tetrahydrofuran,简称THF)。 据本社科普,四氢呋喃多用于表面涂料、油墨、人造皮革处理等,也用在制药行业的主要溶剂。他是可与水混合的无色液体。 当局称自来水仍可安全饮用,一些嗅觉或味觉灵敏的用户可能会察觉到,不过上述物质含量极微,不会对健康造成负面影响。尽管我国水供仍安全,但公用事业局称,民众还是能拨打该局热线1800-225-5782,要求水袋供应。 另一方面,长提对岸新山区部分居民,也反映自来水有班兰叶味道,而柔佛水务联熹有限公司(SAJ Ranhill)调查后称,柔佛河有硝酸盐(nitrate)超标,或是造成新山部分地区自来水传出异味的原因。 据马国媒体《东方日报》报导,该公司已在昨日抽取了柔佛河的原水样品送往化验,检测到硝酸盐浓度达22百万分率(ppm),高出马国卫生部规定,低于10百万分率的标准。 不过该公司也表示,尽管硝酸盐浓度较高,自来水已经过系统处理,而煮沸后的食水仍可安全饮用。

“新加坡被颜色革命的人盯上?” 为何吴俊刚对非暴力逆权如此恐惧?

上周,耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程,院方给的给的理由是,课程“未批判性地接触多元观点”,课程建议的活动和选取讲员,也有损该校不把政党政治利益带入校园的承诺。 昨日,前资深报人暨前国会议员吴俊刚,也对于耶鲁-国大学院的这项决定,在《联合早报》专栏发表评述。 在这篇题为《新加坡不需要颜色革命》,吴俊刚显示介绍课程的背景,由本地剧作家亚菲言和课程经理Tan Yock Theng负责。 根据课纲内容,课程活动之一,包括观看独立制片人苏德祥制作“光谱行动”纪录片《1987解开阴谋》(1987: Untracing the Conspiracy)、有关香港抗争活动代表人物黄之锋的纪录片。课程也安排了学生与苏德祥对话。 同时,也邀请资深老报人巴吉尔(PN Balji)、历史工作者覃炳鑫、社运分子范国瀚、艺术家施兰(Seelan Palay)以及自由新闻工作者韩俐颖等人,与学生交流。…