By Ghui
As Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton battle it out at their respective nomination bids, all gloves are off, as attacks between the various candidates get personal. While the world watches, entertained and appalled in equal measure, a political game that is proving to be just as gripping is brewing in our own backyard – the Bukit Batok by-elections which see veteran opposition politician Dr. Chee Soon Juan pitted against Mr Murali Pillai from the incumbent PAP-led administration.
In the build up to an election in the midst of campaign fever, it would be expected for competing candidates to find new ways to persuade the electorate of why they are more electable than the competition. The most ethical way of so doing is to focus strictly on the merits of your own policies as opposed to character assassination. Obviously, this is much easier said than done as the line between mud slinging and acceptable self-promotion are often blurred. In the heat of debates, political tit for tad is unsurprising.
Like clockwork, a number of PAP stalwarts have stepped up to show their support for Mr Pillai by criticising Dr Chee. What has left me slightly disappointed is the degree to which such PAP members would go just to attack Dr Chee. Most of the criticisms have been focused on Dr Chee in his personal capacity as opposed to on his policies!
For instance, Mdm Halimah Yacob has publicly questioned Dr Chee’s values over the hyped up incident of Dr Chee shouting at then Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong. Personally, I think this is a cheap shot at Dr. Chee. Surely Mdm Haliman should have more worthy criticism against Dr. Chee than an incident that happened so many years ago! Particularly because defamation suits, which bankrupted Dr. Chee, were instituted over that alleged shouting incident. Even if that incident was an oversight on Dr Chee’s part, surely he has more than paid the price? Besides, many are not even convinced that what he did was that bad anyway.
Read more: Mdm Halimah Yacob’s speech gets lambasted by netizens for character assassination
In an election that is only called because of an MP that was caught with his pants down, it seems pretty rich for Mdm Halimah to be talking about values? Besides, has she forgotten the many insults that the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew once heaped on Dr. Chee?
Just as I thought it could not get pettier, enter PAP’s Grace Fu to give the term irony a whole new meaning by taking issue with Dr Chee’s employment status! If I am not mistaken, Dr. Chee’s employment record (or lack thereof) was caused in part by the incumbent government’s manifold lawsuits against Dr. Chee! (read more)
Perhaps Ms Fu’s intention was to paint Dr Chee as some sort of unemployed scrounger who lazes around aimlessly all day. In this she couldn’t be further from the truth. Dr. Chee has been active in politics against all odds. He has written numerous articles and books. He has played an ongoing role in the Singapore Democratic Party. Far from whiling his time away, Dr Chee has been meaningfully engaged in legitimate activity!
Besides, does Ms Fu not deem politicians as being gainfully employed? Was ex Labour Party leader Ed Milliband of Britain someone who did not hold a steady job too?
Despite all his set backs, Dr Chee has always doggedly bounced back. Whatever your political convictions may be, his devotion and fortitude is unquestionably admirable. Through the ups and downs of his political career, Dr. Chee would arguably have gained much experience, insight and empathy. To say that he is not a good choice as an MP because he lacks work experience, therefore lacks credibility and depth.
Instead of having incisive political debates on issues that affect Singapore, this election campaign has delved into the petty personal that detracts from what should really be examined!
Surely the PAP has better things to critique Dr Chee with?
To add even more pettiness into the campaign, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has also waded in and accused Dr. Chee of being racist on the account of some comments posted by some members of the public on Dr. Chee’s Facebook page. While I do not condone the contents of those comments, I do not think that it is fair to hold Dr. Chee responsible for comments that have not been made by him.
Read more – PM accuses Dr Chee of being a racist for failing to remove comments on his Facebook
He is busy on the campaign trail and does not have the support of an entire administration machine. In light of this, surely Dr. Chee can be forgiven for not having the time to comb through all of the comments on a daily basis. Perhaps PM Lee with a strong administration army behind him does not realise that most people do not have that degree of support!
The Bukit Batok residents deserve a better quality of election campaigning!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Who is telling the truth – STOMP or SMRT?

~ By Cheong Yaoming ~ The story about the SMRT train door remaining…

56-yr-old Singaporean arrested in Johor Bahru for ownership of drugs

Johor deputy police chief Senior Assistant Commissioner (SAC) Datuk Mohd Zakaria Ahmad…

失信滥用客户款项 三人接金管局禁令

利用职业行诈骗之事和不诚实行为,两名前银行职员和一名前保险从业员遭新加坡金融管理局(MAS)严禁从事资本市场行业或保险业,长达10至20年之久。 金管局昨日发出有关文告指出,接到禁令的三人分别为前银行职员邓玮玲(译音,Emeline Tang Wei Leng)、前银行职员阮唯明(译音,Nguyen Duy Minh),以及前保险从业员许展龙(译音,Koh Zhan Loong John)。有关的禁令于4月5日起生效。 前汇丰银行(HSBC)职员的邓伟玲以代为存款入定期户口为由,骗取五名客户超过500万元,并提供了伪造文件给这五人,让他们以为有关现款已经汇入户口了。因此他被控滥用超过500万元以及不诚实行为,被金管局禁止20年不可从事资本现场的行业。 阮唯明原为大华银行(UOB)的职员,因为售卖假的金融产品给八名客户,甚至在没通知客户的情况下伪造文件,以他们的名义购买其他的金融产品,并且滥用客户的钱,导致八人蒙受50万元亏损。…

【选举】避免与前进党三角战 革新党不角逐西海岸集选区

新加坡革新党于昨日宣布,指出该党决定来临选举不角逐西海岸集选区,避免与前进党形成三角战。 不过,该党仍会派将到宏茂桥集选区、杨厝港单选区(从宏茂桥划出,选民2万6046人)和拉丁马士单选区(现任议员陈振泉,选民2万5167人) 革新党领袖肯尼斯(Kenneth Jeyaretnam)在文告中也指出,该党是依据前进党旗下团队的去向,以及革新党较有胜算的选区,例如在选民较熟悉革新党的选区上阵。 该党也指出陈清木获得全国认可,革新党也需要前往获得当地民众认可的选区。同时呼吁该党决定能得到选民支持。 上届选举,肯尼斯率领朱来成、诺莱尼·尤纳斯以及苏源顺,对垒前贸工部长林勋强率领的行动党团队,后者以78.6巴仙高得票率胜选。目前该选区由通讯与新闻部长易华仁领导。