In a series of sermons addressed to the megachurch Faith Community Baptist Church, Pastor Lawrence Khong launched a tirade against the Theory of Evolution. In one such sermon, which you can view a snippet of here, he argued that Darwin’s brainchild was “a real deception from the Devil.”

“Every day we are subjected to a worldview that is a real deception from the devil. For example, I mean the world is telling us that evolution is a fact, undisputable. It is taught in schools. But the fact of the matter is I will be exploring with you that you could hardly find any evidence of true evolution. And in fact, evolution is based on faith and not facts.  In fact, if we study the different theories, we find that creation has the most evidence to show us that indeed there is a God who created us.”
– Lawrence Khong

From FCBC’s Facebook Page, it seems that his rage against Evolution is still burning bright. In fact, it seems that he probably has one planned for tomorrow.

Anti-science rhetoric propagated on such large scales by arguably  ‘influential’ people have, in turn, influenced many creationists to promote their arguments, if they may be called so, on public forums. The Humanist Society, which first published the concerned Parent’s letter, had also cited some examples to illustrate the sharp rise in outspoken creationists in the public sphere.

For example, local creationists have written letters to the press attacking evolution and promoting creationism. Talks on creationism were also held on school campuses through religious CCAs. One recent example is a creationist talk in NTU. A prominent historic church, St Andrew Cathedral, is also active in promoting creationism. The Australian-based Creation Ministries International has also been conducting regular talks on creationism in Singapore.

As you will soon see, this has prompted one concerned parent, Mr Martin Piper, to write in to the Ministry of Education to seek clarity as to whether the oxymoronic ‘Creationist Science‘ has a part to play, if any, in School syllabi.
The exchange of letters are as follows.
Mr Piper’s first e-mail to MOE

In this video the pastor Lawrence Khong says evolution taught in school is the work of the devil, that it isn’t based on facts and that his creation myth has the most evidence. I think these kinds of anti-science messages are against proper fact based education and work against the economic interests of Singapore. What in the ministry doing to combat these dangerous anti-science messages and to instead promote real scientific progress?

MOE’s reply:

Dear Mr Piper,
The science topics taught in our schools are selected carefully to ensure that current thinking and developments in science are covered adequately and accurately in age-appropriate ways. The teaching of science in Singapore schools aims to enable students to evaluate evidences and claims critically, and appreciate the impact of science and technology on society. This holistic development of scientific knowledge, skills and attitudes in our students will strengthen their scientific literacy, so that they are able to make informed decisions about scientific claims they may encounter in their daily life. It is with this consideration that the concept of adaptation and evolution is taught across various levels in our science curriculum.
Thank you for your interest on this issue.

Mr Piper’s reply:

Thank you for your reply. If someone demanded that “creation science” or other similar creation myths must be taught in schools, would you be able to confirm that their request would be denied?

MOE’s reply:

Dear Mr Piper,
Such concepts are not in the syllabus.

Although MOE has clarified that creationism is not taught in school, the Ministry stopped short of assuring Mr Piper that it would not explicitly deny future requests that call for creationism be taught in schools. Although I highly doubt that MOE would ever be influenced by such requests, a stronger and more proactive response, especially in light of the surge of emboldened creationists, would be welcomed.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【武汉冠状病毒】本地今增47确诊 20日晚起入境者都需遵守居家通知

根据卫生部文告,本地今日(18日)新增高达47起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,其中有30位病患都是返国的新加坡居民。 有鉴于此,政府呼吁国人延后所有出国行程。从周五(20日)晚11时59分起,凡是入境我国的公民、永久居民和长期准证持有者,都要遵守14天居家通知(Stay Home Notice)。 这意味着,本地确诊病例已增至313人,新增病例中还有五人感染源头未明。卫生部指出,过去三天,近七成病例都是入境病例,且多是从海外返国的我国公民,或长期准证持有者。 昨日我国新增确诊病例多达2人,前日则是17人。 我国是在本月15日,呼吁国民推迟非必要行程。来自中国、法国、德国、伊朗、意大利、韩国、西班牙等国人士,不准入境/过境我国。 新措施下,入境我国人士需申报他们14天居家通知的所在位置(如酒店、住所或亲属住处等)。 至于国务资政兼国家安全统筹部长张志贤,以及马国高级部长伊斯迈领导的新马联合工作小组,将商讨如何确保和维系新马民众、服务和物资物流的安全。 3月18日新增47例确诊病例图表 备注:NCID(国家传染病中心);WP(工作准证持有者);LTP(长期准证持有者) 病例…

聆听总理诉梁实轩诽谤案控辩双方申请 法官保留判决择日书面公布决定

针对总理起诉时评人梁实轩诽谤,以及后者反告总理滥用司法程序,法官在昨日于高庭聆讯后决定针对双方申请保留判决,并将在适当时候公布其书面决定理由。 梁实轩代表律师林鼎,在个人脸书向民众分享案件进展。根据其Carson律师事务所的文告,指出昨日由法官Aedit Abdullah聆听控辩双方陈词。 经过三小时聆讯,法官针对双方申请保留判决,并在适当时候公布对双方申请的书面决定依据。 梁实轩代表律师对昨日聆讯表示满意。并指出该诉讼案关乎公共利益,将继续为大家更新案情的最新进展。 因为被指在脸书分享一则不实报导,梁实轩被李显龙总理指控诽谤。但是后者在12月底,也透过代表律师林鼎反诉总理滥用法庭程序,并向总理索讨“名誉损害”的赔偿。 对此总理代表律师文达星则向法庭申请撤销梁的反诉。 只因分享一则脸书贴文,梁实轩于去年11月遭总理提告诽谤,指出梁分享的贴文内容毫无根据,诋毁总理人格和声誉。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,在接受访谈时指出在一马公司弊案中,新加坡和瑞士及美国,成了调查对象。但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 然而,梁实轩当时纯粹分享贴文,也未留下任何个人评述和留言。他已遵循资媒局指示撤下了贴文,但还是被总理以法律诉讼对付。

Man charged in court for unauthorised modification of website

By Chong Kai Xiong , Image from Channel News Asia Entrepreneur and…

网民呼吁 委任淡马亚教授领导跨政府防疫小组

有网民发起联署,呼吁政府应委任传染病专家淡马亚教授,领导跨政府部门工作小组,统筹防疫工作。 网民Mimi Lee称,对当前由部长们主导的跨政府部门小组的决策感到失望,且照目前情势,令民众担忧新加坡是否会面对第二波疫情来袭。 尽管她认可该小组和医疗人员的努力,不过她也质问,高层人士为何从不咨询本地专家如淡马亚等,协助改善本地疫情。截至本月22日,已有3680人联署支持。 淡马亚是新加坡国立大学杨潞龄医学院医学系教授。近期获委2022年出任国际传染病学会主席。他也是民主党主席,在不久前在武吉班让单选区上阵。 本月初,前进党成员李显扬也直言,或许跨政府部门防疫小组,应该由一位传染病专家、或至少是一名医生来领军,而不是政治人物。