Biologically female Zunika Ahmad, 39, who pleaded guilty to six charges under the Penal Code for sexually assaulting a 13-year-old girl, was acquitted of all six charges on 12 April. The High Court ruled that according to the law, only a man can be guilty of the sexual offences.

Zunika lived and identified as a man since her teenage years and even posed as an Indonesian man to marry two women. While three psychiatrists had separately diagnosed Zunika with gender dysphoria, Zunika is still biologically female.

She had sexually assaulted the 13-year-old girl, who was her neighbour, for close to two years beginning in February 2012, with the acts taking place in Zunika’s home. It was only in 2014 that the assaults on the girl came to light when she reported the incidents to her family members. Subsequently, they filed a police report which led to the arrest of Zunika.

In December 2015, Zunika pleaded guilty to the sexual penetration charges under Section 376A(1)(b) of the Penal Code as well as one count of sexual exploitation under the Children and Young Persons Act. She had admitted to sexually penetrating the girl using external aids.

Despite pleading guilty, Justice Kan Ting Chiu cleared Zunika of all six sexual penetration charges.

Section 376A(1)(b) states that “any person (A) who sexually penetrates, with a part of A’s body (other than A’s penis) or anything else,” a person under 16 is guilty of a crime.

Justice Kan stood by the decision and stated that A could not be interpreted to be a woman. “The reference to a person who has a penis cannot be construed to include a woman without doing violence to common sense and anatomy,” he said. To interpret A as a woman would be rewriting the law, which the court does not have the power to do, he added.

Zunika was sentenced instead to eight months jail for the one count of sexual exploitation under the Children and Young Persons Act and will start her sentence in six weeks’ time. Her lawyer, Ms N. Sudha Nair, said her client was relieved and was sorry for the acts done to the girl. If charged for the sexual penetration of a minor, the maximum penalty for Zunika would have been 10 years’ jail and/or a fine.

In response to the High Court’s decision, non-profit organisation for women’s rights and gender equality, the Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE), stated in a Facebook post on 12 April that clearing Zunika of all sexual penetration charges was simply “not right”.

“The assault should be taken seriously no matter the gender or body of the perpetrator,” the post read. In a second update on 14 April, AWARE also expressed concern for the victim of the assault, stating that regardless of the gender of the perpetrator, sexual assault is not “any less traumatising for the victim”. AWARE condemned the acquittal as a denial of justice to the young victim.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

欠费无法领成绩单 教育部长同意检讨做法

此前,社运份子吴家和在脸书分享,有清寒子弟因家里经济状况因素,学校费用未缴清,致使他们只能领取小六会考(PSLE)成绩单的影印本,幸得善心人士解围才顺利获得成绩单正本。 此事也引来社会群体的关注,有者也发起联署,要求教育部改善措施,废除有关因欠费即扣押成绩单正本的举措。 而有关联署也获得教育部长王乙康关注和回函,也表示有意在今年的国会作出回应。 教育部长也在昨日透过书面答复关注此课题的议员,坦言目前扣押正本成绩单的做法,对于敦促欠费家长可能不是最有效的。他也透露未申请教部经济援助、却欠费的小六考生,每年约占两巴仙。 2019年,这批学生人数约为645人。 有关学生家长已提交经济援助申请 因为成绩单正本被扣事件,而引起社会关注的有关学生,王乙康表示自己也去了解其处境,得知校方实则稍早前已接触有关学生家长,提供他们申请经济援助的表格,惟他们未提交申请。 在领成绩单当天,该学生和他人一样领成绩单,只不过她只是领取成绩单副本,“老师也未察觉到她又感到委屈或情绪受影响。” 王乙康透露有关学生近况,已成功报读邻近家园的中学,至于家长已提交经济援助表格,让他们的女儿可享有援助。 他指出,目前小学每月杂费是6元5角,另外还有6元5角是教育储蓄Edusave支付,而费用如此之低,正是因为我国教育是全津贴的,但少许费用仍是需要的,家长仍需扮演角色,而大部分家庭都认真看待杂费,无论费用多小,它都是向孩子们灌输承诺和承担自身责任的价值。 “可能很多议员会记得过去求学时,排队向老师缴费的情景。我的话过去支付三元。我的老师都会提醒我们支付的费用连买粉笔都不够,但我们仍扮演我们的角色。” 他也重申不同意那些指教育部和学校不关心的说法;反之他们站在教育的最前线,竭尽所能来帮助那些来自清寒背景的学生,包括进行家访。…