The landlord of Ngee Ann City and its anchor tenant, department store Takashimaya, are currently in a dispute over rent and have taken the case to the High Court.
Takashimaya and Ngee Ann Development have been in a business partnership for over 22 years. In 1993, Takashimaya signed a lease with Ngee Ann Development for 20 years, which also give Takashimaya six options to subsequently renew for 10 years each. The lease also states that the rental rate is to be reviewed every five years and that if both parties cannot agree on the value, it will be determined by a valuer.
Hence in 2013, Ngee Ann Development proposed a revision to the rent. This would increase the rent from $8.78 per square foot per month to $19.83 per square foot per month.
With a more than double increase in the rent, Takashimaya rejected the report. As per the lease, the two parties then agreed to each consult one valuer to determine the rent by taking the average of the two valuations presented.
In this agreement, the two parties also stated that any correspondence to the valuers had to be copied to the other side.
However, this agreement was not followed by Ngee Ann Development, who had sent a letter to its valuer with instructions to use a hypothetical layout of the department store. This correspondence was not forwarded to Takashimaya’s side. In response, Ngee Ann Development stated that this was an “administrative oversight” on their part.
Takashimaya has also expressed that the rental value should take into account the existing configuration of the area, and not just the hypothetical configuration used by Ngee Ann Development and it’s valuer.
The High Court hearing involving the two parties began on Tuesday (29 March).

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

M Ravi says jottings confirm his position on his statement

Human Rights lawyer, M Ravi issues a press release to say that the statement…

Don’t give in to PAP’s fear mongering, think about the consequences of a huge mandate for PAP: PV chief Lim Tean

On Sunday (5 July), People’s Voice (PV) chief Lim Tean took to…

读者投稿《早报》分享看病等太久经历 引网民热议吐苦水

经济学人智库评价我国拥有全球第二好医疗成效(healthcare outcome)、我国在世界卫生组织医疗系统排名全球第六、亚洲领先。但是拥有如此耀眼医疗成就的我国,普通民众到公立医院或诊所看诊,仍难免遇上“等久久”的经过。 名为林德花的《联合早报》读者投稿该报,在《医院浪费病人时间》一文分享自身到医院看诊,断续等了近七个小时。其他网民在脸书看到此文,也表示感同身受,踊跃分享等看病的经历。 该读者在文内表示,因担心视网膜问题,预约到蔡厝港综合诊所看诊。诊所医生转介他到国大医院或黄廷方综合医院看专科医生。由于自己住油池,就选择前往黄廷方综合医院。 拿到推荐信的林德花,在当天下午1时05分赶到医院,心里也清楚大概要等上个两三小时。下午三时问护士,说还要等一个多小时,他便去逛附近商场,直到四时许才见到一女医生。 “女医生问了几个问题,就说眼科部门要关门了,要我周一才来看医生。由于当天要上班,只好请医生再安排,她说可以等出勤医生回来,叫我5时30分再回头。” 从下午1时许等到4时许,才说眼科部门要关门来不及看诊,令他感到不满。林德花再到商场溜达,护士打来通知,要到晚上七时才有医生,无可奈何地他只能吃了晚餐继续等。 护士再打来,说医生到了医院,他赶到医院时是6时30分,护士还让他等,进到眼科部门时已接近八时,看诊后离开已是晚上8时30分左右。 他质问,不敢相信我国医院效率之差,浪费病人时间,究竟是院方还是医生的错? 网民也吐苦水分享“等候经” 不少网民见林德花诉苦,也大吐苦水自身在医院或诊所等久久的经历。James OnVacation表示本身因眼角膜上方破裂,在医院等了8、9个小时,被告知医生要六点下班后才过来看。…

Payback time?

Why is the Govt penalising Burmese activists and students? By Leong Sze Hian.