The track incident that led to the deaths of the two young SMRT trainees – Nasrulhudin Najumudin and Muhammad Asyraf Ahmad Buhari – was tragic, avoidable and certainly not unprecedented. In fact, just 6 years back, SMRT Technician Mr Chia Teck Heng was killed under similar circumstances.
In the morning of 27 October 2010, Mr Chia Teck Heng, a technician who had been with SMRT for 11 years, was deployed to check on a power trip which affected the tracks at Pheonix LRT Station when he was hit by an oncoming train. Mr Chia was not on the tracks, but on the designated walkway which was meant to be safe, during the time of the incident.
The following is an article from the Straits Times that covered the incident.
lrt2
Unlike the incident at Pasir Ris, Mr Chia was not pronounced dead on the scene of the accident. The accident caused him to suffer serve injuries to the head and legs. The injuries to one of his legs were so severe that it had to be amputated. He was attended to in a surgical Intensive Care Unit in NUH for 12 days, before he succumbed to his injuries.
lrt3
Mr Chia was married to Mdm Janet Moi Fong Sin and he had 2 daughters who were aged 17 and 16 at the time of his death.

“My eldest daughter was under tremendous stress during that time due to the death of her father and a broken relationship with her boyfriend. She couldn’t manage the emotional turmoil and.. and wanted.. to commit suicide. She cut her wrist.. and threatened to jump off the building. At the time I couldn’t find anyone to help me, so I told my second daughter to just call the police.and ask them to arrest her. I really didn’t know what to do. I felt a tremendous burden.. my heart was heavy.” – Madam Ong, Widow

“During that time when my father passed away, my mum felt very lonely and upset as she had no relatives in Singapore. She felt very lonely and upset. It was all too shocking and sudden. She couldn’t take it. She didn’t eat, didn’t sleep and cried all the time, Things at home were not good as my dad was the sole breadwinner. She was worried for us but at the same time she couldn’t take care of herself.” – Cheryl Chia, Eldest Daughter of Mr Chia

As evidenced by the quotes above, the death of Mr Chia, the sole breadwinner of the family, gravely impacted the physical, emotional and mental health of his widowed wife and his 2 daughters. The quotes were sourced from this interview featuring Cheryl and Mdm Ong.
On 12 September 2012, almost 2 years after the incident, it was reported in the Straits Times that Mdm Ong was suing SMRT for negligence in causing the death of her Husband. The outcome of the case could not be found in public domains.
lrt5
What is of utmost interest, is the fact that SMRT contested the claim and wanted to highlight “to what extent, if any, Mr Chia contributed to any negligence.” Prima facie, this is different from the incident in Pasir Ris where, in a mere matter of days following the incident, SMRT admitted to lapses in safety procedures and readily accept responsibility for the incident.

“We take responsibility and apologise for the tragic accident,” – SMRT Spokesperson

Would SMRT’s acknowledgement of safety breaches give a higher standing to the families of the deceased, should they decide to sue for negligence? As of now, it is not known whether the families of the deceased have any intentions of taking matters to court. The investigations into the incident have yet to be concluded too.
In an effort to provide financial support for the families of the two deceased, two campaigns were kick-started, One is an internal donation drive for SMRT staff to contribute to the families of the two men killed. The other is a public fundraising campaign on Giveasia which has raised more than $46,000 for the two families at the time of writing.
giveasia26
 
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“食物过敏可致命” 网民吁餐饮业者关注

本月17日,一名脸书用户张贴贴文,分享自己的可怕经历:在餐厅用餐,误食引起过敏食物而导致不适,被送入急诊部。他感叹民众对食物过敏的危害醒觉不高,呼吁餐饮业者在准备餐点时,对顾客的特别需求应更加敏感。 网民Huijin Jinnie说,她日前在裕廊坊购物中心的三盅两件餐厅和家人用餐,已特别提醒侍应,自己对海鲜过敏,不要在餐点中加入海鲜。 “我们点了三蛋菜,也再三确认向服务员确认没有海鲜。但是,我在吃了几口后,就感觉怪异,发现有疑似扇贝的碎片,我询问服务员,但他坚称这只是蛋碎。” 已再三提醒不加海鲜 这时,Huijin已感到很不舒服,皮肤瘙痒,眼睛开始红肿,“我再询问另一服务员,却没人理会。直到第四次,服务员才同意代为向厨房询问,得到的答案是他们只是放了一点扇贝而已。” 然而,这时Huijin 的心跳加速,她的母亲只好马上带她去找附近的综合诊所,但情况未好转,只得送入黄廷芳医院急诊部打点滴。 Huijin说,这已不是她第一次在餐厅或小贩中心用餐,因误食海鲜导致遇到食物过敏。她说她的现况已属幸运,有者因为误食致敏食物而丧失性命。 “我们普遍对食物过敏问题缺乏了解,特别是餐饮业者对这类顾客若缺乏敏感,都可能威胁性命安全。“ 餐厅关切顾客健康 三盅两件餐厅管理层在得知Huijin的情况,也非常关切,马上联系其父母并给与必要的协助。…

Temasek's investee company Bayer now being sued in Australia

Last month, Australian news media reported that a Melbourne gardener has become…

遇网络爱情骗子 男子亏损逾7万元

爱情骗局猖獗,受害者不再仅仅是女生,男子也有可能成为受害者。一名38岁男子报警说在约会网站上,遭两名男子欺骗,被骗走了七万余元,岂知两名骗子其实都是同一人。 警方于昨晚发出文告,有一名男子于26日上午报案,声称遇到了网上爱情骗子。 他指出,自己是透过一名男子介绍后,和另一男子相识,但是两人分别利用各种理由,包括支付生活费和学费等,向他借钱,随后就失去联络。 兀兰警署随后展开调查,确认一名相信是在有关爱情网站上,一人分饰两角的32岁男子,涉嫌欺骗了报案者。 嫌犯于报案当天被逮捕,并于今天在欺骗罪名下被提控。 警方呼吁民众对网络欺诈案提高警惕,与了解更多防范欺诈案的手法和咨询,可以游览反诈骗网站Scam Alert或拨打反诈骗热线 1800-722-6688。 若怀疑有任何欺诈案或欲提供诈骗案线索,民众可联络警方热线800-255-0000,或到警方网站www.police.gov.sg/iwitness记录,警方将会采取保护措施,严格保密所有信息。  

丰盛港划艇失踪案:马国当局宣布停止联合搜救行动

我国女商人潘玉珍与男团员陈永顺到马国丰盛港泛舟失踪,经多日搜寻,于14日登嘉楼州瓜拉甘马挽以东5海里处寻获潘玉珍遗体,但陈永顺仍下落不明。马来西亚当局今天宣布停止联合搜寻行动,但个别部门仍会持续展开搜寻。 今早《联合早报》向马来西亚海事机构确认,联合搜救行动将会终止。马来西亚海事机构甘马挽区指挥官拉希迪则表示,尽管联合搜救行动终止,但个别部门执行例常任务时,仍将继续寻找男失踪者陈永顺,一旦有任何最新线索,联合搜救行动将会再度展开。 15名本地男女于8月9日前往丰盛港划独木舟时,遭遇天色突变,强风吹散一行人,而同乘一艘独木舟的女商人潘玉珍及男团员陈永顺下落不明。 马国海事执法机构新山海上救援中心接获通报后立刻展开搜救行动,并在兴楼本亚邦渡轮码头设立搜救基地,动员马海事局、还是执法机构、消防队、警察等多个单位,当地渔民也自愿参与搜救。 经五日搜寻,四名渔夫于彭亨的关丹港口丹戎格朗(Tanjong Gelang)找到属于失踪男子划艇,当局立即派出搜救人员在附近海域搜寻失踪者但仍未果。另一方面,在距离两人失踪地点约100海里(185公里)的登嘉楼州瓜拉甘马挽海域,发现潘玉珍遗体,当时身穿救生衣。 截至今日,搜救行动已进行约12日,今早宣布停止。