SMRT CEO Desmond Kuek (DK): We are investigating exactly how they got hit by the train. What we know is that they were walking along in a single file along the side, along the walkway. They were the number two and the number three; the supervisor was in front of them and exactly how they got onto the track or got close enough to the oncoming train that was moving in the direction opposite to them is the issue that we are trying to establish with the witnesses that we are trying to get detailed accounts from.
Reporter (R): How many were there?
DK: We had fifteen people in this team. They comprised the permanent way team as well as the signalling team because the fault that was uncovered, we were trying to establish whether it was a permanent way track fault or a signalling fault, and so the team comprised both. And these two who died in the incident were trainees on the job training as part of their training routine.
R: All fifteen were walking on the track?
DK: All fifteen were walking on the trackway.
R: Why were they doing work while the trains were in service?
DK: This is standard. Whenever there is a track fault, regardless whether it is revenue service or during engineering hours, we have to investigate every fault.
R: So what was the standard operating procedure when going down on the track?
SMRT Trains Managing Director Lee Ling Wee (LLW): Normally when that happens, there is a track access to request for authorisation from the Operations Control Centre (OCC), and upon approval given, we will then proceed to the trackway. In this instance, that was given and then the power was supposed to be switched off when they reached the location but an unfortunate accident happened before they actually reached the site where they were supposed to do their investigation. There are still rules, safety measures that are preserved, that are put down, and all, whether they are trainees or they are permanent staff, they are trained on all safety issues before they report to the track. They asked for permission to go onto the track, permission from OCC to access the track, and they are in constant communication with OCC. Permission had been given for them go down on the track and to be walking in a single file towards the location. When they reached the location, they are supposed to ask for second permission but the accident happened before they reached.
R: Why is second permission needed?
LLW: The second permission is to trigger power off. But the accident happened before they reached.
R: So the two were struck by a train before power off?
LLW: Yes.
R: The train, was it driven or was it on auto mode?
LLW: The train was driven by a train captain but was on auto mode.
R: The train was in which direction?
LLW: Towards the direction of Pasir Ris, and it was the opposite direction from where they were travelling, where they were walking.
R: So it came in on them?
LLW: The rule is they’re supposed to walk in the direction of the – against the direction of the train. That is what they’re supposed to do.
R: So just to clarify: the train was going towards Pasir Ris.
LLW: The train was going towards Pasir Ris, yes. And they were walking against the direction of the train, which is what they’re supposed to do.
R: How many passengers were on the train?
LLW: I can’t remember; I think it’s in the order of 35 passengers on the train at that point in time the train captain reported that he did something.
R: Was there no one else injured?
LLW: There’s no other injuries besides these two staff.
R: Is it proper for new staff to go down onto the track?
LLW: After the proper training has been given, safety brief done, it is alright for him to access the track.
R: How many of them were walking in that single file?
LLW: Fifteen of them were walking in a single file. The location is about – where the accident happened is about 150 metres away from the station, from Pasir Ris.
R: How serious was the incident?
LLW: It wasn’t a fault, it was an alarm that was triggered by the sensors that we have installed at all point machines. There are 150 point machines in the network, and in recent months, we’ve started to install a condition monitoring device on all these systems, and basically it measures the amount of energy that’s needed to move the track, to move the point, and the high current needed to move the point means that there could be something happening, but not yet. So it is part of our initiative to do preventive details.
DK: The supervisor was in front of the two of them and there were many of the others, as you’ve heard, in the party of fifteen, that were following behind him. So, exactly how it is that they were hit by an oncoming train when there was a clear line of sight, when there was a supervisor ahead of them, is the subject of investigation. To do so, get access to the track while service is on is to walk the side with supervision and control from the Operations Control Centre with all the safety permissions granted. And this is a controlled and supervised activity.
R: And how long does it take from when they start the joinery out to when they reached the place to get second permission?
LLW: The location of the point machine is about 200 metres away.
R: So how long will that take?
DK: It depends on the distance.
LLW: 200 metres, we estimate from there. They were almost there, just 150 metres away. They would have walked 150 metres.
DK: So as what was described, the second permission had not been asked for yet when the accident took place.
R: Only two people got hurt out of all of them. How did only two people get hurt?
DK: That’s exactly what we’re trying to establish, why did the two get hit by the train is what we’re trying to establish.
R: How fast was the train coming along?
DK: The train is on auto mode, so it’s about 60 kilometres per hour.
R: It just left the station?
LLW: No, it’s coming to the station, coming into the station.
R: The train was travelling towards Pasir Ris MRT station; is it from Tampines to Pasir Ris?
LLW: Pasir Ris is the end station, the last station.
R: So is it from Tampines MRT to Pasir Ris?
LLW: Yes.
R: What are the dimensions of the walkway they were on?
DK: I will give you the number.
LLW: We will give you the number.
R: So it actually splits up, the one track splits up to two at the track there; I saw people carry bodies from both sides, how come this was so?
DK: You’re talking about what happened after? That’s recovery process, so it’s not a question of which direction. It’s just simply recovering the bodies from the scene.
LLW: Remember the train services had stopped for us to recover the situation.
R: So was it on the left side of the track or the right side of the track?
DK: Depends on which side of the track you’re looking at.
LLW: Depends on which way you’re looking at.
R: So how is the train captain now, how is the driver now, is anything, is any assistance provided?
LLW: We provide counselling to all the staff directly involved, including counselling to overcome their grief

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

狮城能培养自己的“马斯克”吗? 经济学者称本地社会“过于循規蹈矩”

昨日(12日),国务资政兼社会政策统筹部长尚达曼,透过视讯出席新加坡透视论坛,讨论有关低收入者薪资、年长雇员、市场前景等议题。 是项活动由新加坡政策研究所举行,由李光耀公共政策学院院长柯成兴教授主持。除了尚达曼外,也邀请了美国密歇根大学罗斯商学院教授林愿新加坡国际事务学会主席戴尚志、及乔治梅森大学的经济学教授考恩。 谈到鼓励本地创业和企业家精神,柯成兴就询问,新加坡可以怎么做,来培养自己的脸书总裁扎克(Mark Zuckerberg)或是全球首富、TESLA创办人马斯克(Elon Musk)。 柯成兴的提问似乎遭到考恩“泼冷水”,新加坡能否培养出这种率性而为、放手就干的企业家,后者有所保留。 尽管他认为,新加坡是“全球最富有创商机遇的地点之一”,但在本地,更为强调可预测、重法治、良好施政等才算是“非凡的企业家精神”。 “马斯克不符合狮城风格” 他直言:“我不认为你们会培养出马斯克,他完全不是你们的风格,不是吗?” 考恩补充,这位首富企业家在社交媒体上率性而言、恐怕在“过于循规蹈矩”(too conformist)的新加坡社会,是很难被接受的。 不过,林愿清则反驳,事实上新加坡并不缺乏本土企业家,也对于“潜在独角兽”的萌芽,以及新加坡“未来马斯克”的前景保持乐观。…

“宁可把资源用在更迫切事项” 网民发起联署呼吁无需派国庆礼包

今年因受冠状病毒19疫情的影响,今年国庆庆典也与以往与众不同,尽管不开放民众到现场欢庆,但仍秉持着与民同心,为每户家庭派发国庆礼包,普天同庆。但也有民众呼吁不需要派发礼包,甚至发起请愿书联署,截至目前已获得逾1万人支持。 该联署由网民Kaushik Ilango带头发起。他解释,尽管主办单位想要借此团结民众,为正处于黑暗时期的新加坡公民带来些许欢乐,但比起将派发礼包,网民更希望将这些资源善用在其他资源上。 “2020年是我国记忆中最黑暗的一年,所有人间接或直接受到了冠病19 的影响。此时此刻,我明白分发新加坡人喜爱的礼包必定能够为此带来欢乐。然而,我相信如果将预估140万个礼包用在支持其他资源会更好。” 网民认为,与其将其用在礼包上,不如将它善用在援助其他人,而且礼包内并非每一项都能够长期使用。以往就有出现不少国庆礼包遭丢弃的案件。 经济不景、失业率上升 他表示,如今在经济不景气的笼罩下,失业率也不断上升,因此将这些资源善用到其他地方,反而能够给真正需要帮助的人更多支持。 网民坦言,他自愿将礼包捐出,同时也不想见到更多礼包被白白丢弃,这反而会动用更多人力去整理。 “新加坡可以趁此机会,树立“零废物”的榜样,展现给全世界。” 他也了解,部分人士对于国庆礼包情有独钟,因此他也不想就此剥夺他们的权利,反而是希望主办单位能够设立一个系统,让不想接受礼包的人能够做出自己的选择。 “如果您不希望收到礼包的,可以签署请愿书,并将之传出去让更多人看见。加油。”…

杨南强:疫情下曝露新加坡结构性缺失 冀改善医疗体系提升社会保障

新加坡政府投资公司前首席经济师杨南强认为,在当前的冠状病毒19疫情下,也曝露了新加坡在贫富不均和社会保障上的结构弱点。 他在今日(16日)在脸书发文点评,其中三大结构性弱点,包括常规的收入支援不足,以及绝对贫穷群体的公共住房需求。 就业入息补助计划(Workfare Income Supplement)和乐龄补贴计划的补贴仍少得可怜,这致使他们在阻断措施下面对更大的困难。再者过于拥挤的租赁组屋也存在着风险。 其二,杨南强也提及近期感染人数激增的客工宿舍感染群,他们居住在欠佳的环境,也担忧会造成人道主义灾难,以及让我们的医疗系统不堪重负。 再者,当前疫情也揭示我国对医院的投资不足之处,我们每一千人口才拥有2.5个病床,但在其他经合组织(OECD)成员的平均比例是4.7,如日本的比例就高达每千人有13.1病床;南韩12.3、台湾6.9以及香港5.4个病床。 他认为,这也致使让我国医院系统面对可能不堪负荷的风险。 但他仍希望政府能藉此机会重新反思,加强对于绝对贫穷群体的辅助和社会保障,提供贫困家庭和外籍客工更体面的居所,同时提升医疗体系。  

杨莉明曾告知生意人“静候佳音” 总理国庆致词:目前还不需要刺激经济配套

本月13日,贸工部宣布把2019年的国内生产总值(GDP)经济成长预测,下调至“0.0至1.0巴仙”之间。一些本地商界人士对于经济放缓,也期待政府会否有任何进一步举措,应对当前经济局势。 两周前,人力部长杨莉明抽空出席Midview City 中元会庆,在活动上简短发言,曾告知在场经商者,她说理解大家近期会关注总理会有什么宣布,而她“看了”总理李显龙的国庆群众大会演说稿,认为总理会“传达一些对大家有用的信息”,希望大家静候佳音。 以下截取杨莉明在活动上致词时的谈话重点: “我和我的国会同事、内阁同僚,都非常清楚,你们,尤其是做生意的,在这段期间会有一些紧张。 但是我想告诉你们的是呢,国庆群众大会大概还有十几天时间,而总理会在一年一度国庆群众大会,定会发表重要演讲。 今年的演讲,我想,尤其对做生意的,应该都注意一下。我看了他的稿,相信他会传达一些对大家有用的信息。 当然我不可以“pecah lobang”(走漏消息),也不可以说得太多,只是跟大家交代一声,你们所考虑到的一些东西,我们也很清楚,所以呢,(届时)还是由我们的总理来亲自告诉你,他的分析,还有他的建议,好不好? 所以请大家多等一会,他会有重要的话对大家说”。 当时,杨莉明似乎是呼吁在座的生意人“静候佳音”。两周后,总理在本月18日发表国庆群众大会。我们简略整理总理的演说重点。…