In a press release issued today by the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), its Central Executive Committee shares their response to the suicide of 14-year-old Benjamin Lim Jun Hui on 26 January after he was held under custody by the police for 3 and a half hours that day.
In the release, the SDP raises a number of queries directed at the Ministry of Education.
Firstly, in response to the fact that Benjamin was brought to Ang Mo Kio Police Station by only 3 police officers, the SDP questions why he was accompanied by neither his parents nor any school staff from Northview Secondary School.
The SDP also states that schools are responsible for ensuring the welfare of their students, “even when faced with demands and pressure from the police”. In order to do so, the school could have ensured a staff member drive separately to AMK Police Station in the case where staff were not allowed to directly accompany Benjamin in the police vehicle. The root of this issue is that majority of Singaporeans do not “question the limits of the authorities’ powers” when given directions, states the SDP.
In response to the call that Benjamin’s mother received from a school counsellor after he was released from the police station, the SDP questions why the school pulled Benjamin out from a school camp that was to take place the next day, seeing that “students generally like attending these camps”.
The SDP states that this tragic case is no doubt a wake up call and that no child in the future should have to go through what he did. In order to do so, the SDP is looking towards an independent Commission of Inquiry to investigate Benjamin’s “arrest and his treatment while he was under police custody”. The SDP also asserts that currently, minors are awarded insufficient protection in such cases.
For the full statement, please refer to the SDP’s website.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“仿佛回到4月份前情景” 网友叹地铁内人潮重现

大部分工作领域在6月2日恢复运作,地铁内乘客很多,网友感叹“一夜之间,恢复到4月份之前的景象”。 网友Kingstom Hong在脸书群组“走,新加坡”上载了一张照片,只见昨日(6月2日)的地铁内坐满人群,虽然都戴着口罩,但是无法确定每个人都保持安全社交距离,而且几乎都是“低头族”。 网友也在帖文中写到,“一夜之间,恢复到4月份之前的景象,06/02”,不少网民都表示赞同和会心一笑。 网民对此景看法不一,有人觉得这是繁荣的景象,至少大家都有工作做,有者甚至表示“上MRT都没位子坐”,“我们要和冠病19一起生活”、“没法子,每个人都要找吃养家”。但是有者则认为这是非常有风险的行为,因为随时都会导致病毒传染情况加剧。 网友王云甚至分享到,他在昨日下午三时许乘巴士到裕廊东政府医院门口的巴士站时,见十余名学生聚在一起等巴士,“如有一个中病毒,可说全部都被传染到,看了真伤脑筋”。

Veteran architect Tay Kheng Soon slams poor design of pedestrian walkways in Singapore

Veteran architect and Adjunct Professor at the Department of Architect at the…

追讨工资事发五月 “欠薪者乃分包商”

早前在社交媒体广传的四名客工站在联明建筑公司工地前追讨工资照片,经证实乃是发生在今年五月,涉拖欠薪资者乃是该公司合作的一家分包商,与联明建筑无关。 联明建筑公司发言人澄清,有关事件发生在今年五月,四名员工是向有关欠薪的分包商声讨工资,在当天就获得解决。 在记者追问下,发言人仍不愿透露有关分包商姓名,不过指出员工被拖欠的薪资都已被支付。 基于分包商身份未被揭露,我们无法得知后来这四名工友的命运如何。过去有很多类似案例,都显示客工的准证可能被取消并被遣返回国,即便他们有正当理据提出劳资纠纷投诉。 事实上,根据人力资源部的建议,如果雇员面对拖欠或雇主不发薪资,只能透过三方纠纷管理委员会(TADM)提出薪资索偿,或者寻求工会的协助。 根据劳工法,雇主过了发薪期七天后还没有发工资,都是违法的,初犯者可被罚款1万5千新元或监禁高达六个月,或两者兼施。重犯者最高罚款三万元或监禁达一年,或两者兼施。 然而, 如果员工为了声讨薪资或争取权益,聚集进行无准证集会,也可能面对提控,被罚款不超过5千元以及每名参与集会者每人三千元。这意味着,客工面对这类权益被打压的问题,能够申诉的管道实在有限。