On 26 January, 14-year-old Benjamin Lim Jun Hui jumped to his death from outside his 14th-floor HDB flat. Earlier that day, he was held under custody by the police for 3 and a half hours at Ang Mo Kio Police Division for the molestation of a girl on 25 January.
In response to questions about the police protocol that was followed in handling Benjamin, Acting Minister for Education, Ng Chee Meng gave a statement yesterday, detailing an 8-step procedure police and staff are to follow that is “not new to our schools”.

  1. School staff will be discreet when bringing the student to meet with the police. They will ensure that no undue attention is drawn to the student.
  2. School leaders will ascertain the student’s physical and emotional well-being before letting the police speak to the student. School leaders will also request that the number of police officers speaking to the student be kept to a minimum.
  3. School staff will request to be present if an initial interview is to be conducted at the school.
  4. Should the police decide to bring the student to a police station for further questioning, the school will request that the police contact one of the student’s parents to inform them the situation and location the student will be brought to. The school will also ensure that the student has something to eat if hungry.
  5. The school will request the student not be handcuffed and be escorted to the police vehicle discreetly. However, the police retain final decision to use handcuffs depending on circumstances.
  6. After the student is released by police, school staff will be in contact with parents of the student to provide support and plan follow-up steps to ensure the well-being of the student.
  7. When the student returns to school, the school will monitor the well-being of the student.
  8. The school will ensure the confidentiality of the student’s identity and the on-going police investigations.

Mr Ng noted that this procedure had been followed in Benjamin’s case but that it would be updated when needed, possibly including “the presence of a school staff as an appropriate adult at the police station”.
It is stated by the Minister of Home Affairs and Law, Mr K Shanmugam and Mr Ng that Benjamin was not accompanied by parents nor school staff when he was taken by plain clothes police officers from North View Secondary School. He was also unaccompanied when interviewed by a police officer as it is disallowed by existing police protocol.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Anwar Ibrahim should be transferred from prison to house arrest due to poor health: Lawyers

Malaysia opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim must be transferred immediately to house arrest with…

两周内第二起!宏茂桥发生火灾疑个人代步工具爆炸

宏茂桥组屋昨日下午(22日)发生火患,疑似由个人代步工具(PMD)所引起。 据民防部队所发出的文告表示,火灾地点在宏茂桥1道第224座组屋,民防部队约下午3:05接获通报后立即前往救灾。 抵达现场后发现火势严重,民防队控制火势。同时,民防队员亦将一名成人与三名小孩救出,另60名居民则由警方与民防部队疏散至安全区域。 据《海峡时报》报道,火灾缘由由个人代步工具引起,当时屋主在上班前,于厨房内为个人代步工具充电。然而,下午2-3点左右,屋主法兹(译名)与法兹林(译名)当时于屋内听到巨响。 “我当时正在客厅打游戏,在厨房充电的个人代步工具突然爆炸,然后瞬间着火,我马上跑去叫醒正在睡觉的弟弟,立刻疏散。火势迅速蔓延,就像立刻到我眼前” 法兹忆起。 近日频频发生因个人代步工具引起火患的意外,上周四(18日)武吉巴督组屋凌晨失火,当时救出一名男子与一名女子,而男子经抢救后仍不幸离世。经初步调查,相信火患意外的源头与屋内的电动个人代步工具有关。他们也在屋内找到三辆被烧毁的电动踏板车。 一直都有使用个人代步工具的习惯,对爆炸原因不清 据《海峡时报》记者了解,该个人代步工具属于法兹妹妹的未婚夫,他透露自己拥有个人代步工具已有两年,一直以来均以个人代步工具外送食物,所以并不清楚个人代步工具爆炸的原因。 法兹的母亲则表示,“这是一件很不幸的事,以往个人代步工具一直都没问题”。火灾当时,母亲并不在屋内。 火势一直蔓延至隔壁两个单位的外墙,外墙已烧焦,同时也损毁其中一个单位的电线,导致屋内断电,屋主与其妻儿受困于内,只能等待消防员的到来。 屋主莫哈默德(译名)表示,“当时屋内断电,我和我的妻儿非常害怕…

【冠状病毒19】逾万员工尚未接受常规检测

建设局指出,还有1万3000名员工还未获得雇主安排进行冠状病毒19常规检测(RRT),而当局自6月开始已检查了超过2500个工地,发现每十个工地中就有一个仍需加强防疫措施。 在人力部、建设局、经济发展局和保健促进局于9月7日发出的联合文告指出,截止9月6日,有1万3000名员工未获得安排进行常规检测,因此他们在SGWorkPass应用程序中的“通行码”(AccessCode)仍然维持在红色,即无法工作。 四单位自8月分开始就一直和雇主们进行联系,提醒他们在截止日期,9月5日之前为员工进行常规检测,而相关机构也确保咋截止日期前,提供足够的检测次数供预订,并指导和协助面临困难的雇主们进行安排。 至于未接受检测的员工们,当局表示禁止他们的工作通行证,主要是为了保护他们的健康和安全。当局促请雇主迅速为员工们安排检测,可到保健促进局的拭子检测登记系统(Swab Registration System,简称SRS)进行登记。 若有需要,雇主也可以联系相关的部门,即建筑业的致函[email protected]寻求帮助,海洋和加工业者可致函 [email protected],而有关住在客工宿舍的制造业或服务业客工,雇主可联系www.mom.gov.sg/feedback。若雇主在为员工登记拭子检测上遇到困难,可致函[email protected].。 雇主需委托安全管理人员 另一方面,建设局自6月开始已经检查了超过2500个工地,发现每十个工地中就有一个需要加强防疫措施。而为了杜绝工地成为冠病散播温床,雇主必须在工地里委托安全管理人员,确保工地的安全,至今也已有5万人接受和完成有关培训课程。 安全管理人员的工作包括了确保工地内的员工有登记、测体温、为双手消毒、出席每日会议并提醒员工们注意安全。 工地的安全措施包括了划分区域、避免不同区域员工的接触、错开休息时间和地点、设立指示牌和隔板,并且在每日经常接触的部位和地点进行消毒工作。…

若2030年人口少过690万 为何仍执迷开发树林建组屋?

回溯去年大选,人民行动党政府驳斥民主党,强调政府没有所谓“一千万人口”的规划目标;去年10月,总理公署部长英兰妮也在国会宣称,政府在2018年曾预测,截至2030年,新加坡的总人口数可能会低于690万人。 英兰妮当时也表示,2019年新加坡民生育率达到1.14,与2018年相同。 武吉巴督山坡树林保育发起人Jimmy Tan,对此不禁困惑,假设直到2030年,新加坡总人口可能大大低于690万人,为何政府仍执迷大事开发树林,建造更多组屋住房呢? Jimmy Tan今日(12日)在脸书上持续公开为武吉巴督山坡丛林发声,重申武吉巴督山坡丛林的重要性,以及质问砍伐树林建造住房的目的。 他表示,自去年8月发动联署开始,已获得近1万支持,除了武吉巴督的居民外,其实乌鲁班丹、榜鹅、白沙林一带的居民,也面对附近树林或自然生态栖息地逐渐减少的隐忧。 “这些居民之所以选择在当地定居,是因为可以和大自然亲近、空气清新,偶尔能够看见野生动物,以及享受宁静的片刻。当你看见如此幸福的保护区和自然栖息地,被他们以开发房产地的名义夺走,真的感到很悲伤。” 他续指,与其破坏成熟的次生林(secondary forest),不如将预购组屋(BTO)在一些开发建筑地,或棕地(废弃工业或商业用地)上建造会或许会更好。 另一方面,他也质疑尤其在生育率低的时代,为何仍需要不停建造组屋,甚至不惜破坏已不多的树林,就是为了建造更多住房空间。 “有报道指出,鉴于最近的趋势,截至2030年,我国的总人口可能大大低于690万,为何仍需破坏武吉巴督部分森林,以建造更多住房空间。”…