The Singapore Police Force (SPF) broke its silence on the death of  Benjamin Lim, a 14-year-old male student with a public statement on Monday evening.
Lim was under the investigation for an alleged outrage of modesty.  Shortly after returning home with his mother and sister from the police station, he locked himself in his room and jumped out the window to his death.
In its statement, SPF said it would be reviewing its procedures on the accompaniment of an appropriate adult to be present during the police interview of a minor.
The police also said that it had met the family to clarify the actions of the police officers during their interaction with Benjamin.
TOC understands that the family have met the police on Monday morning, however, was shocked from the details of the meeting. The police had shared details of the interview process and other aspect of the case with the family.
To understand more about the case, please read the interview with the family on what transpired on the day.
Police Statement on Death of 14-Year-Old Male Student Under Investigation for Outrage of Modesty
In this case, a Police report was lodged about a molestation. Based on CCTV evidence, Police officers went to conduct enquiries at a school. To keep investigations discreet, the officers went in plainclothes and in unmarked cars. After discussions with the school officials, and the viewing of the CCTV records, Benjamin was identified as the boy in the CCTV records. He was brought to the Principal’s office by a school official and was spoken with in the presence of a Police officer. Before he was brought back to Ang Mo Kio Division, he contacted his mother to inform her of the Police’s investigations. The Police officer also spoke to the mother.
While at Ang Mo Kio Division, he was interviewed by one Investigation Officer at his workstation in an open plan office with other workstations. He was fully cooperative during the interview. He was then released on bail and went back with his mother.
The Police have been asked whether it should review the procedure to allow an appropriate adult to be present when a young person is interviewed. The Police will review and address this issue.
Police investigations have not been completed. A Coroner’s Inquiry will be held upon the conclusion of investigations, where all the relevant facts will be presented to the State Coroner. At the inquiry, the family will also be able to raise all questions that they may have.
Benjamin’s passing was tragic. The Police have expressed their deepest condolences to the family. They have met the family to address their questions on the case and provide clarifications on the actions of the Police officers during their interaction with Benjamin.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国大检讨委员会全面探讨性不当行为,未来将施以重罚

新加坡国立大学因传出偷拍事件,在上月底成立检讨委员会重新检讨惩处框架。据《亚洲新闻台》报道,委员会在今日(5月15日)向国大师生以及教职人员发出的电邮内容,表示将对性不当行为将施以重罚。 电邮揭示,在调查期间委员会对性不当行为进行全面检讨,同时也咨询学生、宿舍代表和专家等。听取各方意见后,委会认为对犯罪行为,需更严苛的惩处框架和重罚制度来对犯罪者进行处分,希望能对此产生阻遏效应。 对此,委员会提出新的处分制度: 将在送往实习公司或聘雇公司的成绩单上注明停学记录,而记录将在毕业后延续一段时间 停学至少一年以上,同时将以“犯下严重罪行”为由,禁止进入校内 犯罪者只有得到辅导员或专业医疗者的认证后,才获准重返校园。 罪行严重者将会被开除 提供受害者支援,增加校内安全措施 至于有关受害者支援服务单位,委员会表示目前正参考国大的提案。而受害者支援将会由经验丰富或受训工作人员担任,提供受害者从案件发生到结束的支持,直到受害者不需要为止。 此前,国大也宣布加强校内的淋浴间的保护措施,也增加了宿舍的保安人员人数,而在全校宿舍洗澡间内也会安装新的洗澡间锁扣,同时至少安装300架新的监视录像,预计在6月底完成。 委会主席郭运光也透露,委员会接下来三个星期将同学生、校友和专家举行更多交流会,并已委托独立调查机构收集学生的意见。 所有接受调查的人将会进行匿名与保密,而最终调查结果在会6月中旬公布。…

Public consumption of liquor to be restricted

If the new Liquor Control (Supply and Consumption) Bill is passed in…

涉欺瞒人力部 谎报员工薪资 餐饮公司GD遭罚逾九万元

餐饮业者GD集团涉欺瞒人力资源部,虚报多达20名客工的工资,以符合申请就业准证(Employment Pass)的要求。GD集团为此面对20项抵触雇佣外来人力法令的控状,被法庭罚款9万4500元。 根据人力部网站资料,只有合格外籍人士才能领取就业准证,在新加坡工作,其中包括有关客工需有合格相关资历,并领取至少3千600元月薪。 然而,人力部文告指出,在2013年2月至2015年7月,GD集团为了聘请更多客工,虚报20名客工的薪水。该公司替他们谎报4千元-4千800元的月薪,而实际上该公司只给这些客工1千500至2千200元的薪水。 不过,文告未阐明GD公司当初替客工申报了何种“合格资历”,得以获得人力部为这些“外国人才”发出就业准证。 人力部指有关为贵公司透过谎报工资,企图规避外籍劳工的限额规定,藉此骗取客工就业准证,但实际上付给员工的薪资却低于申报薪资。 目前,GD公司也被禁止聘用外籍客工。 “人力部有责任保户守法雇主权益,我们仍会继续惩戒违规雇主,确保企业的公平竞争。” 事实上,这并不是首次发生雇主谎报客工工资的案例。在2014年,也曾有经营便利店的雇主犯下同样错误。 谎报薪资以取得就业准证可视为欺骗行为,每项控状罚款高达两万元,或监禁两年,或两者兼施。    

采访前讲师对大学政策看法 《今日报》报导因“司法挑战”被“消失”

《今日报》一则有关新加坡国立大学(NUS)和南洋理工大学(NTU)离职学者,对大学政策发表看法的报导,惊传遭到“司法挑战”,在本月10日已遭撤下。 有关报导刊登于本月6日,题为《不透明政策、僵化于绩效和排名:为何人文学者离开国大和南洋理大》( “Opaque policies, fixation with KPIs, rankings: Why arts and humanities academics…