Photo by ALMOS

Note: The writer is a member of We Believe in Second Chances, an anti-death penalty group that is part of the Alliance of Like-Minded Civil Society Organisations in Singapore (ALMOS).
The human rights struggles we see in films are often epic, emotional and inspirational; triumphant tales of the human spirit prevailing over cruelty, anger and hate. These stories have is leaving the theatre brimming with righteous fervour, determined to join a crusade for justice.
It’s rarely like that in real life.
For members of Singapore’s civil society on Wednesday night (Singapore time) the struggle for human rights was more a struggle to stay awake as over 100 UN member states made commented on Singapore’s human rights record at its second Universal Periodic Review, alternating between pointless congratulations and often vague recommendations about areas of improvement.
The Universal Periodic Review, or UPR, is a mechanism of the United Nations Human Rights Council. It goes in four-year cycles, looking at the human rights record of UN member states.
During the UPR, violations of human rights are addressed and recommendations are made. The state under review is entitled to accept, review or reject the recommendations made.
The whole process is sometimes criticised as political theatre, where recommendations don’t really go anywhere and the state under review makes its own excuses, and there is some validity in such criticism. But the UPR is also significant in that it allows civil society groups to do lobbying work and make sure that breaches of human rights are set down for the record. It’s also a chance to get a statement out of the state under review over particular controversial issues, information which can be used for future advocacy and engagement efforts.
Countries lined up on Wednesday to commend Singapore on its progress on some fronts, while highlighting concerns. Issues that received attention from multiple member states included the death penalty, the protection of the rights of migrant workers, LGBTI equality, abolishing preventive detention without trial and removing marital immunity for rape, among others.
Singapore will have until June to consider and review the recommendations, but some responses were already made at Wednesday’s session. It was nothing that activists in Singapore hadn’t heard before: that the death penalty was an effective deterrent to criminals, thus keeping the city-state safe, that no one is persecuted for criticising the government, but that speech must be responsible, that the reputations of politicians must be protected in the courts if they have been defamed.
The justification for the retention of Section 377A of the Penal Code – which criminalises sex between adult men – was also as expected:
[youtube id=”fZMF6ImhLlw” align=”center” mode=”normal”] Unwilling to let things rest there, a coalition of civil society groups in Singapore swung into action the day after the UPR session, holding a press conference to make their own responses known.
The Alliance of Like-Minded Civil Society Organisations in Singapore, or ALMOS, is made up of a range of civil society and human rights groups: the Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE), queer women’s group Sayoni, anti-death penalty groups We Believe in Second Chances and the Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign, human rights think tank Think Centre, migrant rights group the Humanitarian Organisation of Migration Economics (HOME), sex workers’ rights group Project X and Function 8, a group of former political detainees who advocate against detention without trial. The coalition had submitted a shadow report to the UPR.
Speaking to mainstream media journalists on Thursday, five panellists from ALMOS gave their take on the UPR session, putting forth their own recommendations.
Jolene Tan of AWARE further stressed the need to remove marital immunity for rape, thus guaranteeing victims of domestic violence the right to due process and protection from their abusive husbands.
Jean Chong from Sayoni wasted no time in pointing out the flaws in Ambassador-at-Large Chan Heng Chee’s characterisation of the situation related to LGBTI individuals in Singapore. Although S377A only targets gay men, Chong pointed out that this anti-gay law, coupled with legislative and administrative discrimination against LGBTI individuals, was a breach of international human rights.
Furthermore, media content that portrays LGBTI persons and relationships in a neutral or positive light are often censored from the mainstream media in Singapore, leaving young queer Singaporeans with a dearth of positive role models in the media.
“What we have is a vicious cycle of pretence, that by letting gays meet in Hong Lim Park and have fun in bars things are okay, but at the end of the day it is our fundamental right to be human and to be treated equally as citizens and live without oppression in our lives,” Chong said.
Jolovan Wham of HOME emphasised the importance of including migrant domestic workers in the Employment Act, thus giving them protections over working hours and conditions. He pointed out that although the government has mandated a weekly day off for domestic workers, this legislation is in no way enough to make up for their exclusion from the Employment Act.
With so many countries taking issue with the resumption of executions in Singapore, Damien Chng of We Believe in Second Chances took the opportunity to further press the government for establish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing capital punishment. He pointed out that Singapore had never provided any criminological evidence that the death penalty is actually an effective deterrence in preventing crime, nor has the government addressed the inevitability of error in the system leading to a wrongful execution.
Additionally, Chng took issue with the use of corporal punishment in the form of caning in prisons. Based on interviews with inmates who had been caned in prison, activists found that the care provided after the whipping – which can go up to as much as 24 strokes in one session – was (literally) sorely inadequate.
Finally, Chng Suan Tze of Function 8 reiterated the call to abolish the Internal Security Act, which allows the government to detain people without trial. Herself detained under this Act in the 1980s, Ms Chng pointed out that this legislation had already been abused many times in Singapore, most notably during sweeps in the 1960s and the 1980s.
“Detention without trial is unconstitutional and cannot protect human rights. It can be abused and it has been abused many times. It has been used against dissenters, people who criticise government policies, and there is insufficient transparency in the processes,” she said, adding that it was surely possible to come up with laws to tackle terrorism without subjecting people to an Act that would detain them without giving them a fair trial.
Human rights is not a popular subject in Singapore. It is often seen as “idealistic”, as opposed to the sensible and pragmatic practices of trade and industry. The government has long seen the pursuit of economic development as the priority, convinced that economic development would trickle down into better human rights and quality of life for its citizens.
Hidden in this rhetoric are many myths, myths which civil society organisations have long questioned in Singapore. ALMOS is simply the latest effort by advocacy groups to continue highlighting the many issues that the city-state continues to face, and activists made clear that their efforts would not end with this UPR.
 
This article was first published in Kirsten Han’s Byline column. To support her writings, visit the Byline website.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Applying for NEA permit means AHPETC accepts permit was needed?

By Howard Lee The third day of the trial between the National…

涉Sparkletots幼园食物中毒事件 Kate’s Catering解除吊销执照获准营业

在三月底,人民行动党社区基金会(PCF)旗下的Sparkletots幼儿园,出现集体食物中毒事件,累计病例多达259起,其中33人入院。 但据新加坡食品局和卫生部声明,有关涉事的餐饮供应商Kate’s Catering,已获准重新营业。 部门声明表示,对于Kate’s Catering采取纠正疏漏的措施感到满意,才解除吊销执照。 交叉处理生肉和即食事物 卫生部和食品局在3月22日至26日展开联合稽查,发现该供应商出现数项卫生疏漏,包括冷冻肉不当解冻,此外,即处理生肉,又同时交叉处理即食食品。 该供应商也缺乏有效措施,来确保食物是否有妥当煮熟‘烹煮时间也不一致,员工对处理生肉和即食食物刀具的区分也缺乏一致。 食品局称,Kate’s Catering在稽查期间已遵守该局指定的措施,包括处理掉所有即食食品、解冻食品和易腐食品。 供应商也清理和为所有设备和厨具消毒,提呈加强食品安全的企划书,包括确保职员始终保持良好的食品卫生。 食品局指出,该供应商职员出席并通过了基本食品卫生课程,负责卫生的员工也接受了再培训,通过了WSQ如何审计食品和饮料卫生的课程。…

尚穆根指在社媒散播假消息 有本地及外籍人士企图煽动客工情绪

有本地和外籍人士透过散播不实视频、照片和信息,企图煽动本地客工社群的恐惧和恐慌情绪,甚至导致他们采取暴力行动,内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根严厉警告类似含有煽动情绪的危险行为,可能会引起本地出现骚乱等严重事件。 他今天下午透过网络视讯,及接受本地媒体访问时指出,近日我国针对客工社群的抗疫力度、三餐和住宿待遇等照片和信息在社交媒体上大量传播,很容易“擦枪走火”引起骚乱事件,尤其是指客工的伙食和住宿欠佳的照片及信息。 他指出,虽然已经大幅度提升客工的伙食量,而大部分客工都对食物品质表示满意,但是他表示“我能够说每一餐都好吗?或每个客工都满意吗?不可能。只是,总的来说,食物是不错的。” 惟,他认为还有个别有心人士在社交媒体上散播旧照片和信息,指责客工没有获得妥善照顾,甚至在没有什么好投诉的情况下,继续表达不满,“这是非常危险的行为”。 他指出,有关的举止旨在煽动客工社群内的恐惧和恐慌情绪,甚至激怒他们。 他甚至引述了最近在社交媒体上流传的视频,声称一名孟加拉籍客工因缺乏资金和工作,进而在本地自杀。警方周二(4月28日)已针对有关视频发出警告,指有关视频并非在新加坡录制,并呼吁民众不要散布假消息和传播视频,因为可能会引起民众恐慌。 尚穆根在访谈中指出,类似视频已经在网上流传,甚至引起约30万客工的恐惧和恐慌情绪。“这是制造恐慌,是造成愤怒、暴力的起因。” “而且这还让我们新加坡人相信,这些客工受到恶劣对待。这是一种带有恶意的视频。” 他也提到另一个在社媒上疯传,有关两名南亚裔男子在宿舍里打架的视频,并指出有关视频是于前段时间,在迪拜一间宿舍内拍摄的。“但是人们企图将它当做在新加坡拍摄一般来传达。” 他还提出了数个例子,并表示这些假信息或旧闻都是为了引起人们暴怒,“人们一旦在这种情况下被激怒,有可能会引发骚乱事件”。 他并未点名任何人做出类似事件,但只表示其中涉及了本地和外国个别人士,因此在访问中作出警告,若发现有明显的犯罪行为,当局将不会手软,必定采取法律行动对付。

ELD: Uneven voter turnout, COVID-19 safety measures, limited resources at large polling stations resulted in “long queues” during GE2020

The “abnormally long queues” that voters experienced during the recent General Election…