Screenshot of Francis Seow in an interview by Martyn See.

Former Solicitor-General, Law Society president and ISA detainee, Francis Seow has died at the age of 88.
The news of Mr Seow passing was first announced by Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) on his Facebook page. He wrote, “I always enjoyed his wit when we met. He also wrote the Foreword to my book, The Power of Courage. My deepest condolences to the Seow family.”
It has been verified with family members of Mr Seow that he has died in Boston, USA, where he had been living in exile.
Seow’s life as a political dissent has been harsh and his eventual exile from Singapore was the ultimate price for voicing against the administration.
Seow had joined the Singapore Legal Service in 1956 and rose through the ranks to become the Solicitor-General in 1969, a position he held until 1971. During his career, he was appointed senior counsel to a Commission of Inquiry in the Secondary IV examination boycott by Chinese students in 1963 prior to Singapore’s entry into Malaysia. For his work, Seow was awarded the Public Administration (Gold) Medal. He eventually left the public service and entered into private law practice in 1972.
Seow was later suspended from law practice for 12 months by Wee Chong Jin, Singapore’s first Chief Justice, for breaching an undertaking given on behalf of his junior law partner to the Attorney-General, Tan Boon Teik, while in private practice. Nonetheless, he was later elected as a member of the Council of the Law Society in 1976 and eventually became its President in 1986.
In May 1986, Seow as the then-president of Law Society issued a press statement criticising the government’s amendment to the Newspaper and Printing Presses Act (NPPA).
In response to this, Singapore leaders accused Seow of using the Law society as a political vehicle.
Three months later, in August, the government announced that it would tighten the legislation governing the law society, forcing Seow to step down as president from the implemented changes passed under the Legal Profession (Amendment) Act. The government also deprived the Law Society to comment on any legislation unless asked by the government under Section 38 (1).

FRANCISSEOW
Straits Times newspaper dated 21 May 1986
Just before the election in 1988, Seow was also detained under the Internal Security Act for 72 days, when he was accused of having received funds from the United States to promote democracy in Singapore.
He alleged that he was subjected to torture during his detention. According to his accounts, he was imprisoned in a small windowless cell, for his entire period of detention with only a raised concrete platform topped with a wooden plank for a bed. During his interrogations, he was forced to remain standing, on one occasion, for sixteen hours.
election_1988  Seow was released just before the General Election 1988 where he joined Workers’ Party to form a team to contest Eunos GRC against the People’s Action Party. The WP team garnered 49.1 per cent of the vote despite the negative publicity surrounding him.
Straits Times - 19 August 1988
Straits Times – 19 August 1988
During the election, Seow was further charged for tax evasion. Later, while awaiting trial for alleged tax evasion, he left for the United States for health treatment and disregarded numerous court summons to return to stand trial.
Subsequently, he was convicted in absentia. While living in exile, Seow spoke at events organised by Singaporean student societies in universities outside of Singapore.
On 16 October 2007, Amnesty International issued a public statement mentioning Seow as one of two prominent Singaporean lawyers who were penalised for exercising their right to express their opinions. Amnesty International called him a “prisoner of conscience.”
video conf
Forum by SDP in 2011
On 8 October 2011, Mr Seow publicly addressed a forum by SDP via teleconferencing. The event was later investigated by the police for any violation of laws.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Do Singaporeans actually not want a non-Chinese PM or is it the PAP that’s not ready?

Based on a survey conducted in 2016, Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam…

PIE高架桥惨剧引以为戒! 林瑞莲质询当局吁保障公共安全

有鉴于2017年曾发生泛岛快速公路(PIE)施工高架桥倒塌的惨剧,工人党主席暨阿裕尼集选区议员林瑞莲,在国会质询当局对于建筑项目的规划,是否应扮演更多的管制角色,侦测和弥补漏洞,以保障公共安全。 林瑞莲是在本周三(4日)的国家发展部财案预算辩论,询问新加坡建设局(BCA)是否有检查和核实,那些项目工程所聘用的合格人员(QP)认证、资历和文件等符合资格。 他提及,国家发展部早在2018年7月,就已针对建筑项目的标准程序规划细节。例如,在提交项目阶段,建设局将对项目蓝图,以及关键结构等的设计计算,进行抽样调查。 这也是确保负责项目的合格人员和认证审查员(accredited checke),都有审核并确保有关设计,是符合建筑管制需求的。 此外,在施工阶段,建设局也会对结构工程进行针对性的检查。 故此,林瑞莲质询,在PIE工程施工时,当局是否曾进行上述审核调查。“PIE高架桥的结构倒塌,根据法庭发现的事实,是否意味着当中有需要弥补的漏洞?” PIE高架桥惨剧 回溯2017年7月14日约凌晨3时30分,衔接樟宜东路上段和泛岛快速公路(PIE)的高架桥在兴建时,突然部分结构坍塌,造成一名中国籍客工丧命和10人受伤。 负责设计高架桥,结果却导致坍塌事故的工程师今早被判86周监禁与1万元罚款。 印尼籍工程师缺乏桥梁设计经验 该起事故当中的46岁印尼籍专业工程师罗伯特(Robert…

林鼎:举证责任在诉方梁实轩无需答辩 诉讼展延下月30日陈词

总理李显龙提告时评人梁实轩的诽谤诉讼,于本周二开始在高庭公堂审理。 在聆讯第二日(7日),诉方传召专家证人潘光俊(Tuan Quang Phan)博士,希望能说明诽谤性贴文的流传度。总理李显龙亦身着粉红衬衫和灰色西服出庭旁听。 梁实轩在昨午选择不出庭供证。他的代表律师林鼎认为,梁并没有供证的必要,举证的责任应在原告李总理身上,且大多事项都可透过书面陈词解决。 林鼎也形容诉方的指控是轻率(frivolous)、无理取闹(vexatious)和侮辱人的(abusive),辩方不会参与举证。有鉴于辩方不供证,案件也展延至11月30日,在法庭陈词。 林鼎在前日盘问李显龙。林鼎也指方式总理也承认未有直接证据,例如梁实轩转发相关贴文的截图。当时,林鼎质问是谁举报梁分享帖文时,李总理表示不记得了。林鼎因此指出,鉴于针对其委托人的诽谤诉讼的严重性,李总理的理据实在是“令人难以接受”。 不过, 总理首席辩护律师文达星在昨日则抗议梁实轩选择沉默,也指对方没办法为自己辩驳。 文达星强调辩方选择不答辩的理由“虚假”(contrived),诉方立场明确。他指责梁实轩的诽谤行为不仅限于转发不实报导,还包括在诉讼程序后,仍吸引民众关注有关诉讼、让民众注意到有关报导的冒犯内容。 林鼎则回应,他是在征询当事人同意后,决定辩方无需答辩,同时这也是因为起诉人的诉讼,是毫无根据和可笑的,且这无关乎勇气,而是不愿助长起诉人的目的,污染“正义的泉源”( pollute…