The NUSS Guild Hall in Kent Ridge was the site of much excitement and argument on Tuesday night as representatives of all 10 political parties gathered for a pre-election dialogue.

Moderated by Viswa Sadasivan, Chief Editor of Inconvenient Questions, the dialogue ran over an hour longer than planned as speakers argued issues from immigration to education to democracy. Representatives were Benjamin Pwee from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Steven Chia from the National Solidarity Party (NSP), Sim Ann from the People’s Action Party (PAP), Goh Meng Seng from the People’s Power Party (PPP), Kenneth Jeyaretnam from the Reform Party (RP), Harminder Pal Singh from the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), Paul Tambyah from the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), Tan Jee Say from Singaporeans First (SingFirst), Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss from the Singapore People’s Party (SPP) and Gerald Giam from the Workers’ Party (WP).

Although this isn’t the first time NUSS has organised an election dialogue, this year is the first time the media has been allowed to report on the event. Sadasivan also observed that it was not only the mainstream media that was in attendance, but also alternative online websites.

Much focus was placed on the future, with all parties agreeing that the upcoming election is crucial for Singaporeans to determine the direction in which the country will be headed.

The issue of town council management cropped up during the dialogue following a question posed by the moderator to Gerald Giam about what he wished had been different about the debate over Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC).

Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss also highlighted that lapses had been found within the People’s Association:

However, Sim Ann said that the response within government agencies to lapses had been swift, while questions still remained regarded AHPETC:

Population and transport issues received an airing at the dialogue, as opposition members said the issues of the past election had not been solved:

A question posed from the floor on whether there are trade-offs between democracy and effective governance also received spirited replies:

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MHA to issue exemption certificate to Singapore Pools and Turfclub for online betting services

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has stated that Singapore Pools Private…

Four Fallacies about the Singapore Welfare State

excerpted from Social Dimension Online: — The last and possibly most damaging…

印度司法程序严重延宕 新印商贸关系是否应更谨慎?

日前,《彭博社》于周二发表一篇文章,强调在印度做生意是多么困难,尤其是他们臭名昭著的司法程序,更是出了名的延宕。这样的延宕严重影响了企业的发展,甚至是损毁了双方的交易。 到底印度在司法程序上,其延宕程度到什么地步?印度最高法院最近颁布一项裁决,也揭示了其严重的延宕程度。一个于1982年将涉嫌伪造姜黄的案件,竟然拖至38年后才完成所有的司法程序,更离奇的是,最终仅被判一个月监禁和500元卢比(约6.70元新币)的罚款。 据了解,该案件在十年后,最高法院撤销了被告的定罪,而且两个下级法院花了约14年的时间才作出判决。 尽管该案看似相当离谱的司法程序,但它也非特别案例。目前印度的三级司法系统中,有近4千万个案件仍在待审中。而在印度的25个邦中的各个高级法院,已有逾17万3千个案例已超过20年,即每个州属平均可能将会有7千宗案例是逾20年以上的待审案件。甚至有近一半的案件已待定逾30年,这还不包括少于20年的待定案件。 印度也被世界银行列为倒数第15位,比巴基斯坦、叙利亚和塞内加尔还要糟糕。若没有一个良好有效的法律制度监督合同的进行,合同的法律效益等于无效,而且当有人违反合同时,也无法即时得到反响。 印度的延宕臭名昭彰,为何我国仍坚决加入CECA? 长期的司法延宕让印度最大的公司趁虚而入,完成许多大规模的交易,如综合健保控股(IHH Healthcare)试图取代印度富通医疗服务集团(Fortis Healthcare Ltd),却因日本制药公司第一三共株式会社(Daiichi Sankyo)申请的庭令而遇阻。 第一三共和富通保健的创办人辛格兄弟对簿公堂,印度最高法院下令IHH暂缓收购交易。辛格兄弟当时也接受印度当局的欺诈调查。…

逃避肃毒局逮捕 男子爬窗失足坠楼亡

涉嫌贩毒的63岁男子遭中央肃毒局上门搜查时,拒绝开门,官员们被迫强行入屋,男子从厨房窗口爬出,却不慎自高处坠落而身亡。 肃毒局9月22日发文告指出,当局于21日在全岛多个地区展开扫毒行动,逮捕了六名年龄介于33岁至65岁的嫌犯,分别为四男两女,并起获近70万元的毒品和17万4000元现金。 据文告指出,当局执法员于21日下午在金文泰斜阳大道(Sunset Way)拦截了一辆轿车,自车上搜出10包约80克的海洛因,逮捕了车上的一名男子(44岁)和女子(37岁)。 执法人员顺藤摸瓜,发现男嫌犯落网前曾和63岁的死者接触,于是追踪到死者位于武吉巴督31街的藏身地,上门搜查。但是住户当时拒绝开门,执法员被迫强行入屋,却发现死者已经从厨房窗口爬出,不慎自高处坠落。民防人员赶抵现场时,证实死者已身亡。死者案件之后交由警方展开调查。 执法人员在该单位内逮捕了另外一名本地男子(65岁)和一名外籍女子(33岁)。 执法员也在单位马桶内发现大量的海洛因,并在马桶和其他地方寻获约4790克的海洛因、1124克的病毒、三包装有约13克的新化合致幻药(NPS)、以及20颗“一粒眠”(Erimin-5),并起获各种吸毒用具和17万4000元现金。 追踪行动继续,执法员于傍晚时分在丹戎巴葛地区的点屋内逮捕两名本地男子(62岁和64岁),起获35包毒品,包括有约一克冰毒和260克海洛因。 肃毒局此次所起获的海洛因约5130克,可供约2440名吸毒者一周的分量,约1125克的病毒也可供640名吸毒者一周的量,当局表示将对所逮捕嫌犯进行调查。