Medishield Life MOH scThe Ministry of Health (MOH) has responded to an inquiry by The Online Citizen in relation to an earlier article on how overseas Singaporeans could face legal problems with Medishield Life.

A petition was started and submitted to Health Minister Gan Kim Yong, raising concerns that overseas Singaporeans, who have existing healthcare coverage in their host country and hence might not be aware of the need to pay Medishield Life premiums, could run afoul of the law as payment defaulters when they return.

The petition called for an open dialogue with the authorities and proposed that overseas Singaporeans can pay for Medishield Life for a specific period of use – a common practice in industry health coverage plans – such as when they return to Singapore after their stint overseas.

Medishield Life is currently mandatory for all Singaporeans and payment defaulters can be prevented from leaving Singapore, fined or jailed.

TOC asked MOH the following questions:

1) Has the government considered granting exemptions, temporary or otherwise, to Singaporeans overseas for the Medishield Life scheme, especially if they have existing plans in host countries that covers them adequately? If not, why?

2) How strictly does the government plan to enforce penalties for defaulters who are working overseas, including fines, jail terms and prevention from leaving the country, as stated in the Medishield Life Scheme Act?

3) There are more than 200,000 Singaporeans living overseas. What has MOH done to make them aware of the penalties that could be imposed on them if they are not able to pay their Medishield Life premiums?

4) Has the government consulted overseas Singaporeans on Medishield Life at all?

5) The petition writers are of the view that Medishield Life covers like a health insurance plan rather than a life insurance plan, and hence should not impose premium requirements (i.e. continuous payments, penalties for non-payment) as a life plan would. Can you comment on this?

In its response, MOH did not answer any of the questions directly, and had mostly reverted to the usual template answers that the petition writers encountered.

“As part of this more inclusive approach, all Singaporeans also contribute to this national risk pool, as part of collective responsibility,” said the MOH spokesperson. “This also extends to Singaporeans based overseas, as they can also benefit from MediShield Life protection any time they choose to return to Singapore, regardless of changes to their health condition.”

Medishield Life overseas petitionThe petition writers have indicated that they cover themselves with travel insurance when they return for short visits to Singapore.

There is also no indication that payment waiver will be considered for overseas Singaporeans. If anything, MOH’s response suggested that it will continue to do what the petitioners were concerned about: Chase their families in Singapore.

“For those who do not pay, we will continue to write to them at their NRIC address, over several months, to give them time to respond. If they are in financial difficulty, they can request for assistance and we will assess them accordingly. For those who need to top up their Medisave accounts to make payment, we will work with them and/or if they request, their family members, to facilitate the process.”

“Non-payment of premiums in itself is not an offence that will lead to imprisonment,” added MOH. “Premium recovery measures will only be undertaken if our sustained outreach to the individual has been willfully ignored over a significant period of time. One of these measures is the imposition of travel restrictions out of Singapore,” noting that this restriction will only be imposed “as a last resort”.

MOH did not clarify if overseas Singaporeans who do not have a contact address that is occupied by family members who can regularly check their mail might be considered “willful defaulters”.

MOH also did not indicate if they plan to reach out to overseas Singaporeans to inform them about the scheme, only that they have “taken note of the concerns of overseas Singaporeans and will take them into account” when improving the scheme.

Health Minister Gan Kim Yong
Health Minister Gan Kim Yong

“Our current focus is to ensure the smooth implementation of MediShield Life but we understand the concerns and will continue to review our policies from time to time. In the review, we will take into consideration feedback received, including the concerns that have been raised, and we will seek the views of the MediShield Life Council.”

Meanwhile, the group of overseas Singaporeans heading the petition, representing more than 1,600 signatories with the majority residing overseas, have submitted it to Minister Gan on 18 August, calling for open dialogue with MOH.

“We hope to be able to speak to you and the Medishield Life Council to come to an amicable solution,” wrote Ms Juliet Low, who leads the group. “This can be arranged via teleconference with the embassy… We look forward to hearing from you favourably before the end of August 2015.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lim Tean questions why Surbana Jurong was "called upon" and not other consultancies

Lately, Surbana Jurong Private Limited has caught the public’s attention as a…

Manpower director makes incredible claims about how well migrant workers are treated by ministry

On 18 March 2014, Mr Kevin Teoh, the Divisional director of MOM’s…

德士师傅辛酸谁人知

前日,《海峡时报》报导一则不幸新闻:一名约60岁德士司机行驶途中疑心脏病发突然昏迷不醒,车上还载着妇女儿童四名乘客,险象环生。所幸一名司机急中生智,把自己的车切到德士前,好让德士停下,才避免更严重的惨祸发生。 事件发生在10月1日,名为甄思良行驶中发现有关德士左摇右晃,觉得不对劲,危急之下他把车子切到德士前,让德士撞上其车尾,失控的德士才停下。 据报导,当时坐在德士副驾驶座的女乘客控制住驾驶盘,把车开到路肩停下。但德士司机已昏迷不醒;后来司机被送到议员,不过已无法抢救而逝世。 回溯今年3月22日,红山发生德士失控撞向行人的致命车祸,男子被证实因肝肿瘤意外破裂,在开车之际突然陷入昏迷导致他在无意识下酿成无法挽回的意外。那位司机也已年届75岁。 同样在3月10日,一名康福德高德士司机,行驶在东海岸高速公路时,途中突然晕厥。车子曾失控并两次擦撞路堤,但随后放慢车速,乘客乘机下车求救。 被环境局开罚单  德士司机跪地求饶 还有近期网传一则图片,显示一名德士司机跪在路旁,向两名两名环境局人员求饶。后来当局证实,该德士司机因为在车上抽烟,被罚款200元。 尽管这位司机先生不需要这么做,但或许他有苦衷,若不是生活所逼,或是财务上捉襟见肘,才不得已放下身段求饶。要知道有时一天载客所得,都不一定能补回这200元的罚款。 长时间工作易疲劳 德士师傅的工作枯燥,有时要长时间待客,并不如外界偏见认为般美好。长时间工作敖出病来,有者有时在外工作10多小时,开车一整天背部、肩颈、全身都会酸痛。 而且,道路上状况百出要长期保持警觉,有时还要注意其他的道路使用者,例如他摩托驾驶者、行人,现在还有个人移动设备(PMD)等。…

地砖破裂租户申诉多次! 建屋局:已联络事主商定维修期

租赁组屋的单位内出现地砖破裂的问题,妇女向有关当局做出多次投诉,甚至曾在大选前向到访的候选人投诉,然而事过三个月却毫无进展。建屋局表示,看到妇女帖文时就已经和对方联系,对之前的维修安排做出解释之余,也商定了维修时间。 署名Roselin Woon的住户在脸书上投诉,指她所居住,位于惹兰勿刹(Jalan Besar)的组屋单位内地砖破裂、门和厕所门已损坏,她曾于今年6月向建屋局做出反映,也曾在7月份大选期间,趁着惹兰勿刹集选区议员潘丽萍,到该处拜访选民时作出投诉。 她指出,建屋局曾在7月大选前,派出一名林姓官员到住家来视察,并拍下破损的部位,还表示会在8月展开修理工作。“官员注意到我有一名三个月大的孩子,所以确认会在8月展开工作。” 而在向潘丽萍投诉时,对方则吩咐助理记下了住户的个人资料和家中破损部位,并保证会处理所有问题。 然而直到上个月,妇女的宝宝已经五个月大,开始学习翻身了,却未见有人来处理地砖破裂问题,令她感到担忧。她之后表示,曾向潘丽萍发出询问邮件,但是并没有获得任何答复。 潘丽萍在受询到相关问题时指出,她自6月开始至上个月20日,她都多次向建屋局反映Roselin的课题。 她表示,在进行家访活动时,不乏有组屋住户反映住家出现自然耗损问题,因此她将在此次国会中提问,以了解建屋局是否能够提供更多资源,为组屋单位进行积极检查和定期维修服务。她认为不应该等到问题出现了,才来维修。 建屋局坦言曾在6月份接到Roselin的投诉,而当局已经安排负责维修工作的承包商。然而有关维修工作还未进行,主要是因为在阻断措施期间就已累积大量工程待完成,且建筑业人力有限所致。 当局表示曾尝试联络妇女,但是她所提供的手机号码已不再使用,上门探访时家中也没人,所以无法向对方做出解释。他们指出,已在Roselin发出帖文时,透过脸书和她取得联系,而据Roselin的解释,她当时因一些私人原因而没有在该处居住一段时间。 当局表示,已和Roselin商议,会在未来几天展开维修工程,而破损的地砖暂时也用纸皮遮盖着。Roselin在获得相关单位协助后,已删除有关帖文了。