Daniel Goh, one of the candidates introduced on Wednesday.
Daniel Goh, one of the candidates introduced on Wednesday.
Daniel Goh, one of the candidates introduced on Wednesday.

Immigration should not be used as a means to shore up the lagging economy or as a step in economic development, said Daniel Goh.

Mr Goh is an Associate Professor at the Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore (NUS), where he is Deputy Head of Department and Convenor of the Cultural Studies Programme.

He has written and spoken on the topic of immigration at various fora in his work.

He made the above remarks to a question by the media at the press conference on Wednesday where he was introduced as one of the Workers’ Party (WP) candidates for the general elections.

“The Workers’ Party is not an anti-immigration party, we have to be very clear on that,” Assoc Prof Goh said, reiterating the position in the party’s policy paper of 2013, which was issued in response to the Government’s Population White Paper that same year.

“WP recognises the contributions of foreigners to the economic vibrancy of our nation and the need for foreign expertise in certain fields,” the WP paper said. “However, the reason for admitting foreigners into our country should be to enhance the quality of life of Singaporeans.”

Assoc Prof Goh said the party believes that “we need to focus always on Singaporeans first.”

“To focus on the Singaporean core and build that up,” he explained. “So, we don’t want a situation where immigration is treated as a way to cure whatever ailments of society, ailments of some economic policy in the past. We would rather that the government focus firstly and mostly all their energies on boosting the Singaporean core – whether it is in terms of birth rates, whether it is in terms of employment, in terms of skills, etc etc.”

The Government’s White Paper on Population – made after the general elections of 2011 – had stated that it was adopting a “planning parameter” of a 6.9 million population scenario by 2030.

The revelation led to intense debate among Singaporeans, with many shocked that the Government was working towards such a population size.

The unhappiness saw 5,000 people take to Hong Lim Park later that year in protest – it was the biggest protest gathering post-Independence.

The Government later explained that it was not, contrary to popular belief, working towards that population size for the country, but that it was just for planning purposes.

However, many remain sceptical – even as the government said it had tightened the inflow of foreigners and foreign workers.

Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say said last week, however, that the tightening of the foreign manpower regime “was not a reaction to past mistakes, but was rather a reflection that realities had changed.”

“We are managing the growth of the foreign manpower at the pace in tandem with the growth of the local manpower,” said Mr Lim. “It’s important that we ensure that two thirds of our workforce will form a strong Singaporean core in our economy … On the whole, we want to do our best to strike this balance.”

Assoc Prof Goh said on Wednesday, “We have fought for the limiting of immigration, not to use a planning parameter of 6.9 million people as a way to help guide policy because once you set that kind of planning parameter, it starts to seep in and become a reality.”

“We have to be very conscious and focus instead on principle – the principle is always to focus on Singaporeans first and foremost.”

When approached by The Online Citizen (TOC) to elaborate further on what he had said during the press conference, Assoc Prof said that there is a need to prioritise limited resources in the effort to enhance Singaporeans’ lives.

“We have to seriously address the question of what do we want to focus our resources and energy on,” he explained. “Building infrastructure for 6.9 million people, as a planning parameter, or focusing these resources on developing the skills of Singaporeans and investing in their future?”

He, however, added that this was “not an either-or question.”

“But it is a question of allocation of resources,” he explained. “We’re often said to be a small country with limited resources. So, what are we going to do with this limited resources, this finite resources? We have to focus [that]. So focus on building up the Singaporean core.”

One way to do this was to invest in enhancing Singaporeans’ skills.

He praised as “wonderful” the SkillsFuture Singapore (SFS) initiative announced by the government earlier this year.

Goh
Goh

The SFS provides every Singaporean aged 25 and above with an initial S$500 of SkillsFuture Credit, which will be topped up at regular intervals and does not carry an expiry date.

The credit can be used on a range of Government-supported courses for Singaporeans to upgrade their skills.

The aim is to foster and continually renew Singaporeans with “deep skills that are critical for the next stage of Singapore’s economy”, Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said when he announced the scheme during the Budget in February.

“We must become a meritocracy of skills, not a hierarchy of grades earned early in life,” Mr Tharman said.

Assoc Prof agreed with the initiative.

“Let’s focus on that – instead of thinking and using immigration as a way to shore up the lagging economy or the next step of economic development and so forth,” he said.

Watch Assoc Prof’s answer the question from TOC here:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

900,000 Singaporean HDB households will receive next instalment of GST Voucher – Utilities-Save (U-Save) rebate

About 900,000 Singaporean HDB households will receive the next instalment of the…

天网恢恢疏而不漏!逃犯盗用失主身份医院登记巧遇失主

天网恢恢疏而不漏!一名逃亡多年的罪犯因冒用身份到要医院看诊,偶然碰上失主! 失主钱德拉(译名)2月25日正在盛港医院看病,恰巧碰上同样正在看病的那伊度(译名),正盗用他遗失的身份证看病,于是向医院通报报警处理。该名逃犯于13年前涉嫌持有武器蓄意伤人及盗用他人身份,昨日(25日)已被判处18个月监禁。 故事开始于13年前,58岁的那伊度(译名)在7-11便利商店和一名报纸摊贩起争执,用钱包里的刀片划伤对方,随后被警方缉捕,但在被保释前潜逃。 在逃亡的过程中,他持有钱德拉的身份证,冒用失主身份看医生。2017年那伊度从脚踏车上摔下受伤,三日后前往胜港综合诊所接受治疗。那伊度多次在胜港综合诊所接受治疗,诊所后来也将他转接到樟宜综合医院。 但樟宜综合医院在处理转介过程时,发现可疑之处。真正的钱德拉仍在监狱里头,但却在显示在诊所接受治疗,院方随后报警,经调查钱德拉的身份证早已通报遗失。 同年11月12日,Naidu家中的电动脚踏车电池起火,他因呼吸困难被送往新加坡中央医院接受治疗。当时,他故计重施,再次以钱德拉的身份证登记,并在没有缴付医药费的情况下逃跑了。院方尝试与钱德拉取得联系,但却无法成功,再次让他成功逃脱。 真假钱德拉相遇 事情快转到今年,2月18日,钱德拉受到来自胜港医院的短信,提醒他关于骨科手术的事。那时钱德拉已出狱。 当时他觉得莫名其妙,但仍依约前来,欲了解详情,而当他被医生通知骨折受伤之时,感到相当惊讶,因为他并没有受伤,当时医生便建议他报警。 随后,钱德拉看见坐在轮椅上的那伊度,并主动提出帮忙登记,而正当钱德拉协助那伊度登记时,便意外发现,原来那伊度就是盗用身份的罪犯。他随后告知医院职员并报警。 眼见事情败露,那伊度试图逃跑,最后被医院保安给逮住。 根据法庭文件显示,两人并不认识,而钱德拉也向法庭表明,身份证已遗失已久。那伊度也将钱德拉身份证上的地址换成自己的地址。…

Court of Appeal reserves judgment on Alan Shadrake

by Deborah Choo/ The Court of Appeal reserved judgment on Monday after…

总理调高退休、重新雇佣年龄 淡马亚揶揄形同鼓励“工作致死”

今早,《联合早报》以《承前启后  克服天地局限》为题,报导总理李显龙的国庆群众大会演讲。总理阐述将在2021年起,逐步提高年长雇员公积金缴交率、未来100年气候暖化问题以及政府将确保学前教育费减低。 针对总理的国庆群众大会演说,新加坡民主党很快就录制视频回应,该党主席淡马亚揶揄调高退休和重新雇佣年龄,形同鼓励“工作致死”。 他说,国人原本期待总理能提出强而有力的建议,应对当前瞬息变幻社会和地缘政治的挑战,但不幸的是国人再次失望。 他表示,总理声称国人要工作到70岁, 但是根据新加坡移民关卡局2018年的统计,因主要死亡原因去世,华裔的死亡年龄中位数(median)为78.3巴仙、巫裔71巴仙以及印裔68.7巴仙。 淡马亚反问,总理也没有拿出理据,能够证明新加坡人难道真得并无意享受退休生活?没有探讨国人究竟愿不愿意花时间享受他们奋斗的果实、含饴弄孙、去做义工或者是有闲暇时间去旅行、玩玩麻将等等。 “反之,我们的总理和部长们坚持要我们一直工作到70岁。” 淡马亚说,曾经询问过前任人力部长,是否放心让一个已年届70岁的脑科医生做手术?还是乘搭由70岁老司机驾驶的公共巴士?但是该部长坚称,这些年长雇员可以接受在培训。 但是,淡马亚曾询问这些巴士司机和脑科医生,他们不认为自己到了那岁数还能再学习新事物,他们更希望能领取足以填补公积金的退休津贴。 教育方面,李显龙指政府目前在学前教育上每年10亿元的投资,下来几年将翻一倍。李总理指出,政府也将确保至少80%的学前教育学额由政府资助,与住房和医药一样给予高比率津贴。 不过,淡马亚指出,这反而让人想起新加坡人常说的自嘲谚语:“给你个鸡翅,拿走你整只鸡”。…