NSP during an outreach event

Hazel PoaBy Cassandra Chia

The recent news of National Solidarity Party’s (NSP) secretary general Hazel Poa resignation, together with her downcast facial expression, came to my sight as I flipped through my newspapers. It was a smart move by the mainstream media to use the situation to the People’s Action Party’s advantage.

Moving the focus past that, I was more curious about what initially made NSP gave up both areas when they could have fought for at least one, even if it meant a three-cornered fight.

And if NSP had taken up the initial offer by Workers’ Party (WP), it would not have even led to the sudden resignation by Ms Poa. However, I can empathize that it was most likely because NSP did not want to give up Marine Parade GRC which they had fought for in 2011 (with a close margin of 43%). WP could also have chosen to not contest in Marine Parade since they know it was NSP’s “territory”.

The outcome of this entangled mess was 1) Ms Poa’s resignation as she “strongly disagreed” with NSP’s decision to contest in MacPherson SMC and 2) NSP’s return to MacPherson SMC due to what they claim was support and appeal by the residents from the constituency. This would mean a three-party fight, which could result in the increase of PAP’s chance of winning.

To give a fair picture, WP did contest in Joo Chiat SMC in 2011 which they nearly won (49%), and the area has now been absorbed into Marine Parade. This was their stated reason for wanting to contest in Marine Parade GRC this year. Still, since NSP contested in Marine Parade in 2011 and WP is already contesting in so many other wards, why not give way to other parties who gave way to you before?

PAP and WP group photo 7 AugIf WP had not stepped into Marine Parade, might NSP even do better this year than the 43% they received in Marine Parade GRC during GE2011?

What does all this show? WP may feel they can easily win Marine Parade GRC this year since NSP was on the verge of winning in 2011. “Since we are the most established opposition party and have prominent supporters, the smaller parties will most likely give way to us.” To give some insight, NSP had also similarly given up Moulmein-Kallang GRC to WP in 2011.

In a sense, WP was very smart when it stuck to their plans and played the waiting game, letting the action and drama play out in NSP, which affects only NSP’s image. Lesson 1: The one who strategise in the long-term, instead of making quick decisions rashly, only stands to win. Lesson 2: More power = more control over the playing field = less prominent parties will give way to us. Does this mean more parties will have to give way to WP in the future?

Another reason for the three-cornered fight in MacPherson SMC could also be the opposition parties thinking they can win MacPherson because of Ms Tin Pei Ling’s presence. Yes, Ms Tin Pei Ling may have faced negative backlash 4 years back, but it seems her image has matured, and she has become more level-headed.

Furthermore, she had just given birth during the pre-election period – which could be an X-factor to draw in more voters, since she is a new mother; and is active even during this post-partum period, usually set aside as a resting period for a mother’s recovery.

Tin Pei Ling, husband and ESM Goh Chok Tong (image - ESM's Facebook page)
Tin Pei Ling, husband and ESM Goh Chok Tong (image – ESM’s Facebook page)

“We have five years. If after five years, Tin Pei Ling remains what she is, then of course, she would still be a factor at the next election. But at this stage, looking at her action, in three years time, she would be a different Tin Pei Ling.” It seems like what Mr Goh Chok Tong said in 2011 did come true, and Ms Tin Pei Ling did persevere to stay on in the political scene. Let’s see if her effort will pay off and if she can prove her worth in September.

And lastly, the burning question: Is there opposition unity in Singapore? No doubt, we saw separate parties contesting when they could have a higher chance of winning by combining forces. However, the opposition parties’ meeting and the fact that most parties gave way to each other to prevent three-cornered fights do show the mutual respect and amity they have for each other.

This article is an edited version of what was first published on Offbeat Perspectives.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Former NCMP Yee Jenn Jong supports Gerald Giam’s call to adopt Apple-Google contact tracing system, says modifying TraceTogether app is much faster and cheaper

The centralised approach would give the Government “better control”, but modifying the…

尚穆根“以香港为例” 合理化对新加坡集会活动管制

内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根在国会拨款委员会辩论内政部开支预算时,以香港为例,解释为何新加坡对于示威活动要有严格要求。他认为如今传媒在谈论示威活动时,往往只会关注警方的过度暴力,尤其是国际媒体。 针对包括香港在内的世界多地过去一年都暴发示威,政府国会内政及律政委员会主席荷兰—武吉知马集选区迪舒沙,以及宏茂桥集选区颜添宝等议员提问,我国内政团队从中吸取哪些经验,是否有能力避免类似骚乱? 尚穆根回应说,维护治安不只是执法人员的责任,社会若是没治理好,内政团队也不能发挥作用。“你可以拥有世界上最好的警队,但除非你把其他方面也顾好,否则你仍然无法应对骚乱”,他表示。 “全世界都会发生骚乱,如智力、欧洲、香港等地方,街头抗议已然升级为暴力,扰乱了普通公民的生活,并破坏公共与私人设施。黎巴嫩也曾因数个月的骚乱而造成严重的损失。正如我提到的圣地亚哥,示威者因公共交通票价上涨被激怒,因而开始抢劫商店、放火烧车和物业。” 随后,他以香港日前示威为例表示,示威者当中他们犯下极端暴力与破坏性的行为,其目的就是为了使政府瘫痪,严重损害经济与城市的声誉。同时,也挑衅了警方。 对此,尚穆根也给予香港警方称赞,能够与新加坡并列优秀警察部队。 尚穆根:香港暴力示威因媒体的报道出现偏颇 针对香港的暴力示威,尚穆根称,“我想说,这已然严重损害警方与公众的关系。” 然而,尚穆根批评,其缘由均因媒体的报道出现偏颇,才会让人误以为警方是暴力一方,而忽略整个暴力行为的过程。他更指向当时颇受关注的示威者被真枪击倒一案,媒体忽略整件事的脉络,从而引领观众对警方出现偏见。 “媒体,尤其是国际媒体对局势的片面之词,并无助于平息示威。示威者总被冠以守护民主的称号,而警方却成为他们的对立面,同时反复提及警方过度暴力与残暴的行为。当警方那个第一次向示威者开枪时,媒体却将警方刻画称“暴力”的印象,并在世界各地大肆报道。” “然而,这件事本身的缘由却被忽略了,正如我所说,示威者经常被描绘成为正义的一方,而警方则却在暗地里被攻击,从而使警方的生命与家人处于危险和被曝光当中,但显然,这些事情却被掩盖了。” 对于香港警方,他们为了能够更好保护自己的家人与亲人,不得已而抵抗示威者。…

【冠状病毒19】航空前线人员全面展开疫苗接种工作

航空业前线人员今日(18日)首次展开接种活动,民航局表示航空业前线人员,在完成冠病19接种的两周后,可以减少接受轮流定期检测的频率。 民航局指出,目前航空业前线人员必须遵守最严格的防疫措施,包括佩戴口罩、穿戴个人防护设备、保持安全距离和频繁检测。 截至目前,航空业前线人员必须每隔七天至14天接受检测,民航局也透露,机组人员和机场前线人员所须遵守的轮流定期检测(Rostered Routine Testing,简称RRT)要求将在他们接种第二剂疫苗的两周之后放宽。 即接受接种后,可以延至14天至一个月接受检测。 此外,在抵新第七天必须接受检测的机组人员,接种疫苗后无须再进行检测;那些必须在抵新时、第三天和第七天接受检测的人员,接种疫苗后则只须在抵新时和第七天接受检测。 交通部长王乙康表示,我国预计将在未来两个月内为3万7000名海事和航空领域的前线人员完成冠病19疫苗接种工作,超过三分之一将在本周内接种第一剂疫苗。 他也指出,若为3万7000名航空前线人员接种疫苗后,也让我国海事和航空业得到了保障,并可能成为全球第一为航空业接种疫苗的国家。 王乙康透露,海事领域前线人员会在来福士城会议中心的疫苗接种中心接种疫苗,而机组人员和机场工作人员则会在樟宜机场第四搭客大厦的疫苗接种中心这么做,两所中心每日分别为多达4千人接种疫苗。 “3万7000人每人需要接种两剂疫苗,相隔21天,我们在两个月内能够完成这项工作。完成免疫后,新加坡对冠状病毒的防卫就向前跨出了一大步。”

中国港澳办支持港警执法 吁各界遵守法治

中国国务院港澳办,今午(29日)罕见就香港局势召开记者会,发言人杨光就近期香港反《逃犯条例》抗争指出,暴力行为抵触“一国两制”底线,支持港警执法,并呼吁各界遵守法治。 他提出三点意见:希望香港社会各界反对及抵制暴力行为;希望香港社会各界坚决守护法治;坚决支持警队严正执法及港府惩治违法者;希望香港社会尽快走出政治纷争。 杨光指出,香港近期事态演变,特别是少数激进份子采取的暴力行为,严重挑战香港法治,以及严重触碰一国两制底线,希望广大市民清醒认识事件严重性,旗帜鲜明反对和抵制暴力行为。 他认为暴力行为超出和平示威范围,并以有示威者涉及咬断警员手指为例,以及示威活动出现纵火行为,形容暴力事件正不断升级。 “(中国)中央政府坚决支持林郑带领特区政府依法施政,支持警方严正执法,支持政府有关部门和司法机构依法惩治暴力犯罪人士。” “经不起折腾” 他呼吁香港社会尽快走出政治纷争,集中精力发展经济,改善民生。 “即便香港积累不错的家底,有一些有利条件和优势,但也经不起折腾。” 他指中国政府关注香港局势,坚持“一国两制”不走样、不变形,并指香港如果继续乱下去,全社会要埋单。