MOM’s Labour Force in S’pore 2014 report
Lim Swee Say
Lim Swee Say

A “two-thirds Singaporean core in the economy”, that is what Manpower Minister, Lim Swee Say, said is the goal of the government in the “medium to long term”.

Mr Lim, who was the former secretary general of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), said the 2:1 ratio of Singaporean workers to foreign workers would be maintained.

“We are managing the growth of the foreign manpower at the pace in tandem with the growth of the local manpower,” Mr Lim said, repeating what other ministers have said in recent years. “It’s important that we ensure that two thirds of our workforce will form a strong Singaporean core in our economy … On the whole, we want to do our best to strike this balance.”

Mr Lim also said that the government’s move to tighten the influx of foreign labour into Singapore “was not a reaction to past mistakes.”

Rather, it was “a reflection that realities had changed”, the TODAY newspaper reported him as having said.

“It’s not so much because the policy of the past was a mistake but rather, we are now having a new stage of growth and therefore we have to pursue a new direction,” he said.

While Mr Lim did not seem to have provided official statistics in his claim that the Singaporean to foreigner ratio is 2:1, a check with government data raises questions about this.

MOM website
MOM website

According to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) website, the Total Foreign Workforce as at December 2014 stood at 1,355,700. [Photo above]

And according to the MOM’s “Labour Force in Singapore, 2014” report, the Total Labour Force in Singapore in 2014 was 3,530,800.

MOM's Labour Force in S'pore 2014 report
MOM’s Labour Force in S’pore 2014 report

Of this, the Resident Labour Force stood at 2,185,200.

According to the MOM report, “Residents (also known as locals) refer to Singapore citizens and Permanent Residents (PRs).”

MOM's Labour Force in S'pore 2014 report
MOM’s Labour Force in S’pore 2014 report

Although the number of PRs stand at some 540,000 (December 2014), MOM does not provide statistics on the actual number of PRs in the labour force in Singapore.

In summary:

Total Labour Force: 3,530,800

Total Foreign Workforce: 1,355,700

Resident Labour Force: 2,185200.

[Note: the numbers do not exactly tally.]

You can see that the number of Total Foreign Workforce is actually more than one-third.

And if you add in the PRs workforce, the numbers are even more stark – the so-called “Singaporean core” is less than two-thirds.

In fact, government statistics show that the number for the foreign workforce in Singapore may be as high as 50 per cent.

In May 2014, the MOM said that the unemployment rate for Singapore citizens was “3 per cent last quarter”, up from 2.8 per cent, while that for residents (Singapore citizens and permanent residents) was 2.9 per cent, up from 2.7 per cent.

See here: “Foreigners make up 50.5% of total workforce in Singapore?

Based on the numbers given by the MOM itself, it would seem that the foreign workforce strength far exceeds the one-third which the government claims is the case.

The authors of the above article wrote:

An estimated 59,300 residents, including 52,300 Singapore citizens, were unemployed in March 2014 while the seasonally adjusted figures were 62,500 for residents and 55,700 for citizens. [Statistics from MOM report.]

Only 49.5 per cent of total workforce are Singaporeans?

So, although there is no breakdown of the employment statistics for residents into Singaporeans and permanent residents (PRs), if we divide 52,300 unemployed Singaporeans by their 3 per cent unemployment rate, we get 1,743,333 Singaporeans in the workforce.

Divide this 1,743,333 by the total employment in Singapore of 3,518.700, and we get 49.5 per cent.

Therefore, does this mean that about 50.5 per cent of the workforce are not Singaporeans?

If so, then we may have reached a milestone in our labour statistics – with more than half of the workforce being non-citizens for the first time in Singapore’s history.

Whatever happened to the consistent rhetoric in recent years that the influx of foreign labour will be curtailed?

Read also: “Mr Lim’s two-thirds target of Singapore core – For how long?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Former NCMP Gerald Giam questions why MOH took two years to notify affected individuals of the HIV data theft

In the latest HIV data leak fiasco, former Non-Constituency Member of Parliament…

人权律师挑战黄循财 辩论公共住宅本质

撰文:人权律师M Ravi(北雁翻译) 我发现政府还在宣扬,公共组屋住户就是拥有者的说法,就像拥有99年租赁权的私有公寓屋主一样,可以出售他们的租约。想请问国家发展部长黄循财,能否说清楚建屋发展局公共组屋和99年私有租赁,两者的法律含义比较? 较受全球认可的法律立场认为,公共住宅住户即使无法偿还政府或私人银行贷款,也不能扣押或拉回其住所。但为何新加坡政府可以这么做呢? 根据新加坡扣押法(Distress Act),阐明若您是向政府租赁产业,例如租组屋,政府就不能申请扣押庭令(Writ of Distress)来充公您家中或您租户的财产,或者拿来拍卖、以销售收益填补租金。 事实上,我曾在高庭援引上述法规,挑战某官联公司充公我客户价值20万元印刷器材的做法,我客户最终也成功索回这些资产。这是在官联公司推出商业租赁的情境下。 那我为何提起此事?我i知道有新加坡人失去了他们的家园和组屋,但遗憾的是很多律师不愿提起,因为他们为相关提供贷款的银行工作。 既然黄循财强调公共组屋买家不是租户,认为这“不符事实和法理”,那黄部长是否愿意针对此事进行友善的辩论– 特别是假设某人无力偿还贷款,他们的公共组屋是否会被收回?…

Nas决定暂居新加坡 网民赞弹参半

来自以色列的著名网络旅游博客亚新(昵称Nas),选择了要在他认为“近乎完美”的国家,新加坡暂时定居两年!有关消息一经传出,立刻迎来大批粉丝和朋友的祝福,但是新加坡国民的回应就不完全这么正面了。有人甚至在网上发起请愿,希望别让他到我国定居! 女友线上宣布将定居 Nas的女友塔米尔(Alyne Tamir)昨日(3月20日)在Instangram上贴文宣布,他们将要搬到新加坡了。“经过长达三年的旅行,能够在一个地方住上两个月真是太棒了。不用重复打包行李。”   View this post on Instagram   It’s…

Chan Chung Sing: Virus outbreak is a ‘very good lesson’ on importance of supply chain diversification

The spread of the novel coronavirus which has caused a shutdown of…