SWAMI home’s constitution
PAP chairman at press con in SWAMI home
PAP chairman at press con in SWAMI home

The Online Citizen (TOC) reported on 15 August that the People’s Action Party (PAP) may have contravened the constitution of the Sunshine Welfare Action Mission (SWAMI) home.

Or rather, the home itself may have breached its own constitution under the Registry of Societies (ROS) Act.

On Friday, 14 August, the PAP held a press conference in the premises of the home to introduce its candidates for Sembawang GRC for the upcoming general elections.

The event was headed by the chairman of the PAP, Khaw Boon Wan, who incidentally is also the Minister of National Development.

Mr Khaw and his colleagues were decked out in the white uniforms of the PAP for the media conference at 5, Sembawang Walk, in the north of Singapore.

The PAP badge was pinned on their uniforms too.

The New Paper, 14 August 2015
The New Paper, 14 August 2015

As TOC reported, SWAMI home is a charity and a voluntary welfare organisation (VWO) which “cares for its elderly residents, provides dementia day care for the elderly, and medical, nursing and other support services to the elderly or sick elderly living at home.”

It is also a recipient of government funds.

According to its latest annual report, it received between S$6 million to more than S$8.5 million in government grants each year from 2011 to 2014.

SWAMI Home Annual Report 2015
SWAMI Home Annual Report 2015

The PAP Government has always insisted that voluntary welfare organisations (VWOs), such as the SWAMI home, and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) which receive government fundings must not engage in political activities, or promote any political agenda.

See here: “Exploiting VWO for political purposes – PAP’s double-standards”.

Mr Ravi Philemon, a director of an NGO, had also pointed out that such societies and homes usually have a provision in their constitutions which would forbid its members or its premises from being used for such political activities or for political purposes.

Mr Philemon said:

“I have several years of senior management working experience in VWOs, and so I know that most VWOs’ Constitutions specify that such organisations shall not indulge in any political activity or allow its funds and/or premises to be used for political purposes.

“Is this clause also specified in SWAMI Home’s Constitution? If so, did SWAMI Home contravene its own Constitution by allowing its premises to be used for political purposes?”

Read here: “Did VWO violate constitution by allowing political activities in its premises?

TOC has managed to obtain a copy of SWAMI home’s constitution from the ROS.

Indeed, in clause 22.6 of the document, it states very clearly:

SWAMI home's constitution
SWAMI home’s constitution

“The Society shall not indulge in any political activity or allow its funds and/or premises to be used for political purposes.”

The PAP’s press conference to introduce political candidates for an election to elect political representatives for Parliament was clearly a political activity held for a political purpose.

In 2013, Mr Ho Ka Wei, Director of Corporate Communications, Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth, reiterated that there must be a separation of politics and VWOs and NGOs which receive government funding.

Mr Ho was responding to a letter from Ms Braema Mathi, president of NGO Maruah, asking if the rules were the same for government MPs and for people associated with opposition politics.

Mr Ho replied that indeed the rules apply to all.

MCCY website: Ho's letter to Straits Times
MCCY website: Ho’s letter to Straits Times

Mr Ho said:

“The rules are indeed the same for all. The Government supports many NGOs and VWOs. Government MPs who serve with them, as well as everybody else, must be clear that their role is to help achieve the particular social, cultural or educational goals of these bodies, and not to exploit these bodies for their own political ends.

It is worth repeating the last sentence above:

Government MPs who serve with them, as well as everybody else,… must be clear that their role is…not to exploit these bodies for their own political ends.

If this was so, why then did the PAP find it alright to use the premises of the SWAMI home for a political activity for a political purpose?

And just as importantly, why did the SWAMI home allow its own constitution to be breached in allowing its premises to be used by the PAP for a political purpose?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

马国提控巴西古当污染案涉案者 一新加坡业者被告

涉及新山巴西古当金金河污染案,马国政府今日(24日)将一名华裔新加坡籍业者、一名马国华裔和印裔罗里司机提控上庭。 被告分别为2名华裔男子,即来自新加坡的业者王景超(译音,34岁)、马国男子叶永亮(译音,42岁),以及35岁的印裔司机马里丹,3人皆来自巴西古当同一家轮胎处理厂。 根据马国《星洲日报》报导,上述于今早逾9时在警方的押送下,被押上新山第三地庭进行面控,被告在面对媒体时用衣服及口罩遮面,避免样貌曝光。 三人皆否认指控,马国两名被告分别获准以25万令吉(约8万9000新元)及10万令吉(约3万3600新元)保释在外,而新加坡业者则不获准保外。 当地法官谕令择定此案将于4月30日过堂。 被告于3月7日将废料倒入河 根据控状,首名被告马里丹被控于3月7日凌晨12时01分,在巴西古当马赛城一路的金金河,用罗里和油槽箱运载并倾倒被列为编号SW311的油渍废料进入河内。 第二名被告叶永亮则被控于3月7日凌晨12时01分至凌晨1时间,在巴西古当马赛城一路的金金河旁,教唆马里丹和王景超倾倒编号SW311的油渍废料进入河内。 第三名被告王景超被控于3月7日凌晨12时01分至凌晨1时间,在巴西古当马赛城一路的金金河旁,教唆马里丹和叶永亮倾倒被列为编号SW311的油渍废料进入河内。 三名被告因此牴触1974年环境素质法令第34B(1)(a)条文。一旦罪成,可面对监禁不超过5年及罚款不超过50万令吉。 清理受污染河流耗资216万新元 金金河化学废料污染案爆发后,当地警方于本月18日及19日,先后逮捕11名年龄介于27至41岁的男子助查,警方事后释放1人。…

本地越南人买六千口罩 每人三片免费赠街坊

在武汉冠状病毒疫情下,尽管总理李显龙等领袖已提醒,只有身体不适才戴口罩。不过本地口罩需求激增已是不争事实,一些民众希望戴口罩预防感染。 就有一群旅居本地的友善越南朋友,想到本地居民的困境,购买了6000个口罩,在我国部分地区分发。 据脸书群组All Singapore Stuff的一名读者分享指出,有一群越南朋友购买了6000个口罩,分成每三个口罩一袋,于昨日进行派发。 他们表示,免费口罩于16日(周日)傍晚6时至7时期间,分别在大巴窑建屋局中心广场,以及后港坊外的中央活动大厅进行派发。 参与活动的网民林俊财在评论帖文中指出,在活动开始不到五分钟,大巴窑处已经派发了3000个口罩,而在后港,10分钟内也已经将3000个口罩派完。 澄清口罩品质已获验证 “两处的派发活动分别由九名新加坡人、三名马来西亚人和三名越南人一起进行。尽管下着大雨,但是需要口罩的人群在派发活动前30分钟,就已经聚集。” 部分评论者留言质疑口罩质量,他澄清是100巴仙无纺布,自印尼口罩工厂所购买,且该工厂专门供应给当地医院。他补充这些口罩已缴付消费税,透过手提携带入境。 也有读者帖文,指不少新加坡人都出资参与有关的派发口罩活动。 网民纷纷对此义举按赞,感激他们的帮助。…

陆交局办“回收违规个人代步工具换奖励”活动

个人代步工具意外频传,包括充电时引发大火,乃至近期发生的严重碰撞事故。陆路交通管理局(LTA)在脸书专页分享,称自7月31日起至8月31日,当局自MyTransport.SG应用程序上,取获多达270个有关个人代步工具或电动踏板车的投诉。 陆交局指出,透过民众的反馈,当局验证了更多适合安装闭路电视和雷达的热点,而上周末当局就在其中一个部署点,即巴西立11街(Pasir Ris Street 11)检测到9起违规事件。 当局也感谢民众的合作,让当局能够为了维护民众的安全,取缔“危险骑士”。 帖文上所展示的把照片包括有使用个人代步工具的骑士行驶在行人天桥上,最后在天桥另一端被逮捕;超重的47.84公斤个人代步工具、电动脚踏车骑士在上行人天桥之前被拦下等。 网民:减少依赖车辆,却缺乏妥善规划 网民非常欢迎陆交局的取缔行动,并询问当局如何看待遭电动滑板车撞倒六旬妇女事件,是否有为对方提供协助等。 网民反映在2010年还未有个人代步工具时,基本上都不会有类似的意外事件。“但是陆交局为了减少交通工具的依赖,引进个人代步工具,却缺乏了妥当的危机处理程序和计划。” 网民也提醒当局应该为代步工具使用者设定年龄限制,以便使用者能够更成熟且为他人着想。 也有网民认为,与其设定年龄限制,倒不如设置时速。“在主要的个人代步工具上安装警铃,当使用者超速了就会响,时速越快,响声越大。”…

As we celebrate another successful SAF day, let’s not forget our comrades who have fallen behind

As Singapore celebrates yet another SAF day, we can be thankful for…