Sylvia Lim Instagram post

Sylvia Lim Instagram

Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean fired his party’s latest salvo at the opposition Workers’ Party, demanding that the party prove it is “at least able to run a town council” and taking issue with one of party chairman Sylvia Lim’s Instagram posts in a report by Channel NewsAsia.

DPM Teo was referring to the ongoing Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) saga. The opposition-run town council has faced questions related to the management of its accounts. Teo pointed at Punggol East SMC, which had been managed under the same Pasir Ris-Punggol town council until WP won the seat in a 2013 by-election, saying that that town council had gone from a surplus to a deficit.

“Essentially what happened was this: Hougang town council was running a deficit, they took over Aljunied, a town council which was in surplus (following the 2011 General Election). They took over Punggol East from Pasir Ris-Punggol town council which was also in surplus. Now the whole Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council is in deficit,” Teo told Channel NewsAsia.

Turning his attention to WP chairman Sylvia Lim’s new Instagram account, the deputy prime minister went on to say: “Now we see the chairman of the town council saying that Fengshan SMC looks quite delicious. What’s going to happen? You’re going to swallow up Fengshan? For what purpose? To serve the residents of Fengshan? Or is Fengshan delicious because you want to add it to the pot? And help the town council with the deficit?”

Lim had shared a photo of herself eating an oyster omelette, presumable in a hawker centre somewhere in Fengshan SMC. Her caption read: “The taste of Fengshan – heavenly! #reasontowin”

While some agreed with Teo that WP’s running of town councils should be further scrutinised, Teo’s remark has since been criticised as petty and unprofessional by commenters on Channel News Asia’s Facebook post.

Screen Shot 2015-08-14 at 9.13.48 pm Screen Shot 2015-08-14 at 9.12.59 pm Screen Shot 2015-08-14 at 9.12.45 pmScreen Shot 2015-08-14 at 9.22.34 pm Screen Shot 2015-08-14 at 9.22.11 pm

WP supporters on Instagram also expressed their distaste for Teo’s comments:

Screen Shot 2015-08-14 at 8.51.53 pm

 

Teo had other criticism for WP too, saying that they were “rabble-rousing” and “inflaming emotions” during the elections only to remain silent on certain issues in Parliament. He also said that WP leader Low Thia Khiang’s reaction to Transport Minster Lui Tuck Yew’s retirement from politics were merely “crocodile tears” and that it was “very characteristic of Mr Low to squeeze the most political mileage out of anything.”

The Straits Times also reported that Teo had said in a closed session with the media that the general election was not about getting opposition voices in Parliament, as the Singapore Constitution already guarantees nine opposition members as Non-Constituency Members of Parliament (NCMPs).

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Online users disappointed with LTA for only now considering to ban PMDs with no safety certification

Following a series of fire incidents involving personal mobility devices (PMDs) that…

《网络公民》英语站暂停更新 惟中文站继续运作

昨日,本社总编许渊臣受警方传召,前往警察总部广东民大厦接受调查。盘问从下午三点许一直到凌晨12点才结束,许渊臣才得以离开警局。 警方是根据投报,指其中一篇由Willy Sum,撰写于今年9月4日的文章“The take away from Seah Kian Ping’s facebook post”,严重指控政府高层涉及贪腐,而援引刑事法典第21条(1)的刑事诽谤罪展开调查。 五名警员到许渊臣的住处,充公其桌面型电脑、手机和笔记型电脑等用于工作的电子设备,致使本社英语网站暂时无法更新。…

律师:巴蒂案存“一连串的失误” 赢公众信任端视当局能否妥善、公开检讨

印尼籍前女佣巴蒂胜诉一事,仿佛成为本月热门话题,特别是高庭法官陈成安的判决如同在司法界抛下震撼弹,迫使警方、总检察署都得检讨案件,内政兼律政部长尚穆根也表示,将在下周的国会会议发表部长声明。 在Audent Chambers事务所服务的高级律师哈碧星,于《海峡时报》撰文分析前女佣巴蒂案。他提到有鉴于巴蒂案件“一连串的失误”(the chain of errors),任何的检讨都不应被拘束,也不该将问题归咎于某些人为疏失而已。 “应视此案为检视和解决现有机制缺陷的重要契机。” 哈碧星认为,这不意味着要打击警方、总检察署、法院等维护公共利益的努力,反之,也不该对司法机构的疏失羞于启齿。 在高庭法官陈成安的判决中,点出所谓“赃物”移交警局过程存在疑点。包括廖家声称开箱检查女佣留下的三大箱子并报警,但警方迟至五个星期才去取证和分类“赃物”,且未立即取走,而是一年半后才将这批物件保管。 再者,尽管巴蒂的母语是印尼语,但警方却以英语和马来语问话,且只让她检视不清楚的图片,而不是实际涉案物品。这同样引起许多疑点,包括这是否符合警方搜证的程序?如是,那么其他案件的证物搜证是否也被影响? 再者,若巴蒂案件的搜证与正常程序不同,那么负责警员这么做的原因何在?那么负责检控的检控官,难道没发现搜证过程出问题吗? 尽管总检察署没有义务去解释检控的决策,惟考量到巴蒂案牵涉群众利益,透明化乃是去建设对体制信任的一个关键。…