Some members of PA Board of Management.

The Auditor General’s Office (AGO) released its report last week, and particular attention has been focused on the People’s Association (PA) and its lapses in financial accounting.

The PA is chaired by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, and has several ministers on its Board of Management.

We will highlight each lapse in the AGO report in the coming days.

The AGO’s audit on the PA found, among other lapses, instances where training operators were engaged directly by grassroots organisations without calling for competitive bids.

Auditor General's Report
Auditor General’s Report

The AGO said it had “test-checked” 91 Community Club Management Committees (CCMCs) and found that 35 of them – or almost 40 per cent – did not obtain approvals from the relevant approving authorities for awarding 53 tenancy contracts worth $17.78 million.

The AGO also found that 10 of the 35 CCMCs did not obtain the relevant approvals for the direct award of 13 tenancy contracts worth S$3.67 million without competition.

Neither the AGO report nor the PA itself have disclosed which are the 91 CCMCs audited, or the 35 CCMCs which have been found to have lapses in their accounting.

It is also unclear which constituencies these CCMCs are from

Below are screenshots from the AGO report:

PA1

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens sympathise SingPost postman for working around the clock to deliver mails, but some call for check with the labour law

It definitely has not been a good couple of months for Singapore…

Proportion of citizens hired under Jobs Growth Incentive between Sept 2020 and Feb 2021 is similar to proportion in resident labour force: MOM

The proportion of Singapore citizens hired under the Jobs Growth Incentives as…

印度司法程序严重延宕 新印商贸关系是否应更谨慎?

日前,《彭博社》于周二发表一篇文章,强调在印度做生意是多么困难,尤其是他们臭名昭著的司法程序,更是出了名的延宕。这样的延宕严重影响了企业的发展,甚至是损毁了双方的交易。 到底印度在司法程序上,其延宕程度到什么地步?印度最高法院最近颁布一项裁决,也揭示了其严重的延宕程度。一个于1982年将涉嫌伪造姜黄的案件,竟然拖至38年后才完成所有的司法程序,更离奇的是,最终仅被判一个月监禁和500元卢比(约6.70元新币)的罚款。 据了解,该案件在十年后,最高法院撤销了被告的定罪,而且两个下级法院花了约14年的时间才作出判决。 尽管该案看似相当离谱的司法程序,但它也非特别案例。目前印度的三级司法系统中,有近4千万个案件仍在待审中。而在印度的25个邦中的各个高级法院,已有逾17万3千个案例已超过20年,即每个州属平均可能将会有7千宗案例是逾20年以上的待审案件。甚至有近一半的案件已待定逾30年,这还不包括少于20年的待定案件。 印度也被世界银行列为倒数第15位,比巴基斯坦、叙利亚和塞内加尔还要糟糕。若没有一个良好有效的法律制度监督合同的进行,合同的法律效益等于无效,而且当有人违反合同时,也无法即时得到反响。 印度的延宕臭名昭彰,为何我国仍坚决加入CECA? 长期的司法延宕让印度最大的公司趁虚而入,完成许多大规模的交易,如综合健保控股(IHH Healthcare)试图取代印度富通医疗服务集团(Fortis Healthcare Ltd),却因日本制药公司第一三共株式会社(Daiichi Sankyo)申请的庭令而遇阻。 第一三共和富通保健的创办人辛格兄弟对簿公堂,印度最高法院下令IHH暂缓收购交易。辛格兄弟当时也接受印度当局的欺诈调查。…

May Day message from Chiam See Tong

MEDIA RELEASE My fellow Singaporeans, A happy May Day to all of…