Singapore has long had the practice of naming cross-bred orchids after celebrities and foreign dignitaries. Yet the ceremony to name an orchid after British Prime Minister David Cameron on Tuesday took an awkward turn when the orchid appeared to reflect the colours of a rival political party.

The Tory website in its colours.
The Tory website in its colours.

The Papilionanda David Cameron, reportedly the culmination of five years of work, was not the rich blue of Cameron’s Conservative Party (often known as the Tory Party), but the purple of the UK Independence Party (UKIP), a party led by Nigel Farage that received 12.6% of the vote in the British general elections earlier this year. Members of Cameron’s party, such as Douglas Carswell and Mark Reckless, famously defected to UKIP last year.

The UKIP website in its colours.
The UKIP website in its colours.

According to British media, this fact was not lost on the prime minister, who stared at the flower for a moment before observing that the petals were a “darker purple” near the top.

Downing Street, the office of the British prime minister, chose to soldier on bravely by saying that the sepals and petals were a “shade of blue”, but a factsheet by the Singapore National Parks Board (NParks) handed out to the press at the Botanic Gardens stated that the “sepals and petals are a delightful blueish purple, and with each bloom being complemented by a large and prominent dark purple lip.”

According to The Guardian, Cameron has promised to bring a cutting of the orchid back to the Downing Street garden, where he will get a constant reminder of how his orchid, too, might have already defected to UKIP.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Reform Party chief Kenneth Jeyaretnam launches new charity for poverty relief in S’pore

Reform Party chief and blogger Kenneth Jeyaretnam announced on Tuesday (5 January)…

Police investigates private forum under Public Order Act

the following is a media release by Singaporeans for Democracy (SFD): —…

社论:人民海啸的预兆?

为了应付工人党市镇会诉讼的费用和可能的赔款,工人党三名领袖:前党魁刘程强、主席林瑞莲和秘书长毕丹星,在本月24日公开向公众募捐。 仅短短四日,截至27日,就募得107万6170元的捐款总额,共6千155各个人或团体踊跃参与捐款。这几乎等同,平均一天就募得25万,而且大多还是来自普通民众和支持者的捐款。 毕丹星在个人脸书感谢各界的支持,也通知民众募捐总数已足够,呼吁大家停止捐款,并表示稍后将为大家更新有关捐款用途的资讯。 “经济援助固然重要,但是大家在精神上的支持,却是无可衡量的。” 权且不论诉讼结果为何,惟三名领袖适时喊停募款,并未挟持民意对百姓予取予求,也清楚表明捐款的目的。至少在募捐这件事,对百姓有个清楚交代。 四天就募得100万元,是个什么概念?许多工人党支持者都来自草根阶层,也有自己的生活开支要负担,但还是有很多人义无反顾捐款,显示他们心中对三名领袖的信任。 但在这背后,如果领袖自身没有扎实的群众基础,如果没有用多年耕耘社区、服务选民的经历;如果当了国会议员只是坐在国会当“Yes Man”,白领薪水不为民发声,民众会愿意支持这样的领袖吗? 三名工人党领袖打官司,没有动用党资金,也没有使用公款,先是自掏腰包募款,实在不够,只好向民众募捐。筹款数目够了,就停止。也许还有更多民众愿意捐款?我们不得而知,但从此事来看,却似乎能看到,民众展现对反对党的支持,以及对反对党长期遭打压的状态感到不满。 古语言:擒贼先擒王,要瓦解一个组织,就的先把带头的砍下马。表面上,看起来这是两个市镇会,对三名领袖和市镇会理事追讨欠款,但其中一名控方律师文达星,却是行动党前议员,也是已故李光耀和李显龙御用王牌律师。鉴于被告都是政党人物,但是有亲执政党背景之嫌的文达星却未避嫌,肩担控方职务,在诉讼审讯期间也咄咄逼人。虽然无法干涉,但是坊间却对此次审讯的质疑却是存在的。 有些民众刚拿到300元的国家花红,就立马捐款给三领袖;他们原可用这些钱补贴高昂的水电费。假设我国执政党领袖也搞捐款,会有人相信吗?会有民间支持吗? 邻国马来西亚反对党,没有任何拨款,党的运作或任何活动,全靠民间支持。我国反对党在威权体制下,在恶法、社会操控和媒体等层次面面几乎都掌控在无所不包的当权者手中,反对党几乎是在夹缝求存。没有资源、没有可寻租的关系,想升官发财的人肯定不削加入反对党斗争。…

Inflated legal costs—all eyes on SMC for now

In recent weeks, there have been a lot written in some blogs…