MP for Sengkang West, Lam Pin Min
Lam Pin Min
Lam Pin Min

A controversial post by the Member of Parliament (MP) for Sengkang West single-member constituency (SMC), Lam Pin Min, seems to have been hidden from his timeline on his Facebook page.

The display had roused criticisms among members of the public for the inappropriate use of the national emblem to form the numerical figure “50”, to mark Singapore’s 50th year of independence.

Some of the flags were formed upside-down or hung vertically, which are not allowed under the “Singapore Arms and Flag and National Anthem Rules” in the Singapore Statutes.

The rules also forbid the national flag from being used as decoration.

Should flags be used as decoration? Some flags are upside down.
Should flags be used as decoration? Some flags are upside down.

Dr Lam, who is also the Minister of State for Health, had announced on 17 July on his Facebook page that the display had been put up, “after two months of planning and preparation” by grassroots leaders and volunteers.

Lam Pin Min Facebook post, 17 July 2015
Lam Pin Min Facebook post, 17 July 2015

He also posted some photos of the preparation and display, with one photo showing the flags being laid on the ground.

Under Singapore’s laws, the national flag is not allowed to touch the floor.

Flags on floor - Sengkang West grassroots leaders and volunteers preparing the flags for display
Flags on floor – Sengkang West grassroots leaders and volunteers preparing the flags for display

Soon after the display, questions were raised about the appropriate use of the national flag for such a display, and many posted on Dr Lam’s Facebook page querying him, with some asking him to remove the display as it was disrespectful of the flag.

Criticisms on Lam's Facebook page
Criticisms on Lam’s Facebook page

Dr Lam’s post and those comments have since been apparently hidden from the main page of his Facebook account – when a visitor visits his Facebook page, they no longer see the post on the main page.

The photos of the preparation and the final display of the flags are still on Dr Lam’s page.

But the display in Sengkang West is not the only one using the national flag in a possibly inappropriate manner.

Over at Tampines Street 41, there is also a similar display of the national flag in the numerical figure of “50”, which also calls into question if the flag can be used for decoration in such a manner:

Under clause 9 of the “Singapore Arms and Flag and National Anthem Rules”, it states:

9.—(1)  No person shall use or apply the Flag or any image thereof… as or as part of any furnishing, decoration, covering or receptacle, except in such circumstances as may be approved by the Minister, being circumstances wherein there is no disrespect for the Flag.

Display in Tampines St 41
Display in Tampines St 41

And over at Bishan, the national flags are tied on strings in a series.

But according to the rules:

“[The] Flag shall be hung against a vertical wall or other vertical flat surface”.

Flags in Bishan
Flags in Bishan

There are very specific prohibition and conditions in the “Singapore Arms and Flag and National Anthem Rules” about the display of the flag, and these include:

1. The flag must not be used as decoration.

2. The flag must be displayed against a vertical flat surface, or on a proper pole.

3. The flag, if displayed overnight, must be illuminated.

4. The crescent and stars must always be at the top left position when viewed by any person.

5. The flag must not touch the floor.

The flags displays in Sengkang West, Tampines and Bishan seem to contravene these rules.

Silence from authorities and Dr Lam

This writer had written to the authorities – namely the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) and the National Heritage Board (NHB) – and Dr Lam himself to ask for clarification but have so far received none.

After receiving no response to a feedback form which this writer had submitted to the MCCY on 19 July, a call was made to the ministry on 23 July whereupon an officer over the phone promised to get the officer-in-charge to return the call on the day itself or the next day.

No such calls have been received thus far.

An email query was sent to the NHB on 21 July about the use of the state flags in Sengkang West.

After again receiving no response at all, another reminder email was sent on the 24th of July – but there has been no response till date.

Dr Lam, too, has not responded to the email sent to him on 20 July.

Indeed, Dr Lam has totally ignored all the comments on his Facebook page.

The flags display in his constituency remains in place when last verified on Wednesday morning, 29 July.

Read also: “Not right to use national flag as decoration in Sengkang West“.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ST praises CapitaLand CEO pulling of mega deal 4 months into job

Yesterday, the Straits Times published an article praising CapitaLand CEO Lee Chee…

LTA announces COE quota for Feb and April 2017

Land Transport Authority (LTA) has announced that the Certificate of Entitlement (COE)…

What Plunging Oil Prices Mean To You (Part 1)

By Dinesh Dayani, Dollars and Sense DollarsAndSense explores how declining oil prices…

退休银行家敢敢揭发! “业界都知某些银行排挤新加坡专才”

前日《海峡时报》报导,本地数家银行宣称,他们有强大的本地人核心雇员团队,也培育本地人才的渠道。 不过一位退休银行家可不这么认为。他在《海峡时报》论坛发文,指出过去20年,不少在新加坡金融领域的外籍人士,担任中高级管理职位。 “一旦被雇用,这些外籍职员很容易就能在短时间内拿到永久居民。故此,分析本地雇员比例,把新加坡公民和永久居民相提并论是令人混肴的。” 早前,渣打银行声称其新加坡籍员工占了七成;星展银行称,银行1万2千人的雇员中,90巴仙以上都是新加坡人和永久居民。 瑞银(UBS)声称,她3千员工中,75巴仙都是本地人或永久居民。 这位退休银行家 Raymond Koh Bock Swi,坦言在疫情冲击下的经济,失去待遇优渥的PMET工作,对国人是棘手的问题。 他也建议,银行应向金融管理局和人力部,揭露新加坡籍雇员,与永久居民和其他外籍人士的比例多少,有多少新加坡人担任高管也要披露。 再者,也要规定雇用一定比例的本地雇员,例如新加坡银行应雇用九成,而非新加坡银行雇佣85巴仙等。若因特殊原因雇员比例有不同,也应有合理的理由和获得政府机构批准。…