SMRT Pte Ltd and the Land Transport Authority (LTA) has identified the massive train disruption that occurred last month on 7 July to be caused by a water leak into weakened electrical systems.

The disruption crippled both the North South Lines and the East West Lines during rush hour and left a quarter of a million people stranded.

In a joint media briefing by SMRT and LTA at the LTA headquarters on Wednesday, 29 July, it was also noted that the breakdown could have been prevented, due to a mistake in classifying the severity of the fault.

Some scenes from the disruption on July 7.
Some scenes from the disruption on 7 July.

Weak Electrical Resistance

“The disruption was caused by intermittent tripping of the rail power system at multiple locations, due to the lower electrical resistance pathway at a third rail insulator.

However, the weak resistance of an insulator can allow electricity to flow through the insulator to the ground, resulting in a higher than normal voltage difference between the running rail (the surface on which the train wheels run and through which the electricity returns to the source to complete the circuit) and the ground.”

It started with a water leak, at a spot between Tanjong Pagar and Raffles Place MRT. The water, after tests on residue samples, was revealed to have had high levels of chloride, which then contaminated the surface of the insulator and thereby decreased its resistance levels.

“The presence of chloride on the insulator, coupled with a wet environment, would have significantly reduced the effectiveness of the insulator.”

Electrical current was thus able to bypass the insulator and creep down the third rail support bracket down to earth, causing ground voltage levels to spike above a certain limit.

The higher than normal voltage difference between the ground and running rail triggered a protective safety relay system, which then tripped the system as a safety mechanism.

 

In explaining why the issue affected the entire network of both lines, the LTA said simulation checks in Braddell station showed that when earth voltage rises at one particular location, the voltage also rises in other locations, causing trips across the network.

Leak spotted early, classified as non-urgent

A patrol officer on the Saturday before the incident had spotted the leak and classified it as “non-urgent” at the time, said Mr Lee Ling Wee, MD for SMRT Trains. The downpour one night before the breakdown is also believed to be an aggravating factor.

These were the conclusions of a team of independent experts from Sweden’s Parsons Brinckerhoff and Meidensha Corporation of Japan, who were recruited by LTA to look into the power supply infrastructure and railway trackside installations. The process involved checks on 200km of tracks, 141 trains and logs from the day of the incident.

Rectifying the problem

To address the issue, it has started replacing all third rail insulators, a process which should be completed by the first quarter of 2017. To monitor the condition of the insulators, data loggers will be installed at all 47 traction power substations on the NSEWL within the next two months.

desmond_kuek_0

“We have reviewed all existing work instructions and we’re satisfied that they have been complied with,” said SMRT CEO Desmond Kuek. “Arising from the Jul 7 incident, we will be taking very firm steps to review and improve all work instructions to tighten the most vulnerable spots in the system.”

SMRT will also raise the setting of its protective relay system, known as the 64P, to a higher level so as to make it less susceptible to power trips. This raise is also in line with international standards.

At the end of the briefing, Mr Kuek also gave credit to the commuters of SMRT.

We thank our commuters for their patience and understanding over the incident. We continue to adopt a zero-defect attitude, learning from each and every incident that takes place and we’re committed to ensuring a high level of safety and reliability in our system.”

As to whether SMRT would be slapped with a  fine for it’s role in the disruptions, LTA CEO Mr Chew Men Long said the LTA is still investigating and will give more details at a later date.

Adapted from media reports.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Ho Ching says only guilty parties have something to fear with POFMA – same logic applies to transparency

When debate around the proposed fake news bill was starting to gain…

Singapore retains position as second safest city in the world behind Tokyo – Safe Cities Index 2019

Singapore retains its position as the second safest city in the world,…

需负担奖励顾客归还托盘费用 裕廊西小贩联署要求废除

裕廊西小贩中心12名小贩,提交一份联署诉求信,呼吁环境局指示该小贩中心运营商,废除由小贩承担的奖励顾客送还托盘措施。 顾客每自行归还一个餐盘,可获得两角钱的奖励;但是这笔费用却要由小贩们承担。有感于每个月多出数百元增加负担,这12名小贩致函环境局,也把诉求信提呈给裕廊西小贩中心的运营商,口福集团子公司Hawker Management。 根据《今日报》报导,这些小贩是在今年8月作出上述申诉。小贩们称,打从裕廊西小贩中心在去年开张以来,只有该小贩中心奖励顾客,在用餐后归还托盘。 其中一名小贩透露,除了每月约两千元的租金和其他附加费用,承担奖励顾客归还托盘的开销,每月累积下来,有时可高达900元。 其余附加费用还包括1100元的清洁和收碗盘费、250元的服务费和300元的自动现钱机费用,致使小贩每月开销加上租金可高达4千元。 其中一名40岁不愿具名小贩表示,为此他们也曾于顾客争议,例如假设食物分量用一个托盘就可装完,顾客却拿了三个托盘,就必须给顾客6角钱的奖励。如果生意较好时,这种成本还会增加。 也有小贩反映,随着近几个月客流量减少,回归托盘的费用也侵蚀了小贩们的盈利。在生意难以为继的情况下,一些小贩选择转移经营地点。 至于环境局发言人称,有收到部分小贩的反映,但认为他们在和Hawker Management签署租赁合约时,理应注意到有关的收费条款。 另一方面,Hawker Management…

Activist Joshua Wong gives an insight about Hong Kong’s July 1 protests, says he’s “proud” of the protesters

In case you’re not aware, Hong Kong is going through a rough…