Goh Thiam Poh, PAP MP for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC
SEG's Singapore Excellence Award
SEG’s Singapore Excellence Award

On 8 May this year, Mr Paul Lee was surprised to receive a call notifying him that his company had been nominated as one of the “Top 100 companies” in the “Singapore Excellence Award.”

The call, he said, was from a “senior project officer” from the Singapore Enrich Group (SEG).

SEG is a publishing and consultancy firm.

“The officer came to my office on May 11 to present this ‘good news’,” Mr Lee said.

All he needed to do was to pay S$6,000 to receive the award.

The fee also entitles him to  publicity in the SMRT trains, a gala dinner and an award which would be presented to him by a Member of Parliament (MP).

“Without a doubt, I agreed and signed this ‘scam contract’,” Mr Lee said. “Indeed, I checked their web site and there are video showing award ceremony, especially when Members of Parliament were there such as Dr. Lim Wee Kiak, MP of Nee Soon GRC; Ellen Lee Geck Hoon, MP Sembawang GRC.”

Mr Lee said the award certificate even carried the Lion Head symbol to “reinforce the national award identity.”

But it was too good to be true, Mr Lee said.

The Lion Head symbol is government property and can only be used with permission from the authorities, particularly the National Heritage Board.

Mr Lee’s suspicions about the authenticity of the award were raised when he said SEG became aggressive in colleting the full payment of the S$6,000 fee.

SEG, he said, wanted to collect it on 14 May, which was only three days after visiting him at his office.

“In addition,” Mr Lee said, “I found out that a tuition center next to my office has a similar Award!”

Mr Lee then apparently made up his mind to decline the award, and asked for it to be cancelled.

“When we said we want to cancel, they said we need to pay 50 per cent of the S$6,000,” Mr Lee said.

“This term was listed in small print behind the contract but I was not notified about this small clause in this first place,” he added.

He said he became “even more suspicious that I fell into a scam.”

His doubts were also heightened because he said he ran a sole proprietorship, which was “a small business.”

“Therefore, it would not make sense to be nominated by public to be Top-100 companies in Singapore. There are many SMEs in Singapore,” Mr Lee said. “It should be given by SMEs association or government body such as SPRING.”

SEG Award Certificate
SEG Award Certificate

He also had questions about the timing of the award being given in May, and that it was the public which nominated the awardees, as claimed by SEG.

“Another reason is that parents [who] sent their children to our art studio would not be bothered about this,” Mr Lee said. “We are doubtful who and why would anyone nominate us.”

He said that there was no evidence to show that SEG had received approval for the use of the Lion Head symbol.

Mr Lee also described the “scam” as a “million dollar business”.

“This million dollar business scam can be broken down with simple math: 100 companies x $6,000 (it was $7,500), it will be $600,000. If they are 10 such ‘awards’, it would be $6 million. Indeed, their web site has 10 Awards!”

And finally, Mr Lee noticed that there is no mention or transparency about the criteria, selection process, or the committee involved in giving out the awards.

“It was a wake up call for me about this Scam Award and reported to the Police accordingly,” Mr Lee said.

“I was lucky to have awakened before I made any payment,” he added. “From the list of companies mentioned on their website, there are many companies [which] seemed to [have] fallen into these scam awards, even the MPs are made to believe by giving these awards with speeches at a Gala Dinner.”

The Straits Times had also reported in July about the nature of these awards.

In his defence, the chief executive of SEG, Alex Yeo, denied that the awards were part of a scam but were instead a “legitimate business”.

“If I was running a scam, I would not have more than 500 companies supporting me since I started the business,” he said.

Ang Wei Neng, PAP MP for Jurong GRC, at SEG event
Ang Wei Neng, PAP MP for Jurong GRC, at SEG event

The presence of MPs gracing the events as guest-of-honour have raised eyebrows and questions. Their presence, some say, lend a veneer of glamour and credibility to the awards which are given out by a private company.

The Straits Times reported that at least seven PAP MPs have attended these events in the past few years, and had presented the awards to the recipients.

PAP MP David Ong, 4th from left, at SEG event
PAP MP David Ong, 4th from left, at SEG event

MPs say they attended these events to support local SMEs, and also for fundraising for charity reasons.

“Winners feel important when receiving the award from an MP on stage and having photos taken,” said a staff member of one of the firms handing out such awards.

But it is not just MPs who have been approached to lend their presence to such events – even ministers were too.

“For instance, last year’s Promising SME 500 award was handed out by Senior Minister of State for Health and Manpower Amy Khor. The year before, it was Senior Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office Heng Chee How,” the Straits Times said.

Mr Heng said that “the invitation for the 2013 Promising SME 500 awards dinner was made through a grassroots leader.”

He said he had “stood in for a minister who could not attend the event because of scheduling.”

Last year's SEG gala dinner at MBS
Last year’s SEG gala dinner at MBS

Questions about the nature of the awards have been raised since at least 2013, as can be seen in this post: “The Singapore Excellence Awards – whut???

Here is an email sent to a company by Media Enrich Enterprise Pte Ltd, which is a subsidiary of Singapore Enrich Group Pte Ltd.

Only towards the end of the email does it say, rather casually:

“For your info,there will be a sponsorship required to cover for the printing and editorial interview as well as for the logistics and operational cost of this prestigious event.”

This “sponsorship” turned out to be $6,000 for Mr Lee.

SEG email 3

 

Read also: “PAP MPs’ attendance at “sham” awards events raises questions.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

被指庇护该国前行长 外交部:等斯里兰卡提供引渡法律资料

日前,斯里兰卡总统席瑞塞納在该国公开场合表达对我国的失望,因为我国至今仍未针对引渡该国前央行行长马赫兰的请求,采取行动。 席瑞塞納指出,我国总理李显龙曾向他保证,不论马赫兰是否是新加坡公民,都会采取行动。 59岁的马赫兰,被指控涉及高达7400万美元的内幕交易骗局,据称他目前仍在新加坡。 对于斯国总统指我国“庇护”马赫兰的指控,我国外交部在昨日(20日)回应媒体询问,指还在等待斯里兰卡提供引渡法律下所需资料。 外交部发言人称,新加坡自1月18日起,一直针对此案和斯国保持联系,不过该国提出引渡要求时,却缺乏在我国法律下需要的资料。 “我国已要求对方提供,但至今仍未收到有关资料。”发言人表示,新加坡希望斯里兰卡能提供所需资料,以便我国能根据本地法律处理斯国的引渡请求。 发言人指出,一般引渡请求属保密性质,为此通常新加坡不会公开评论。不过有鉴于斯国总统对此发表公开言论,就有必要澄清。 此前,席瑞塞納失望新加坡至今仍未针对引渡请求作任何回应,他认为新加坡至少都要给个说法,证实马赫兰是否还逗留在新。 2015年1月被委任为斯里兰卡银行总裁。他被指控涉嫌透露敏感资讯给他从事证券商的女婿。他们被指在2015-2016年期间操作债券拍卖,导致该国蒙受1100万元的损失。 他透露国际刑警已发出红色通缉令要缉拿马赫兰。去年2月被揭涉及千万元债券丑闻后,马赫兰就出逃,回避在该国出庭面控。斯里兰卡央行为此启动审计,来核算马赫兰任职期间内幕交易的涉及程度。

原因不明 狠心装修商涉砸死9月大男童

不知何故,装修商竟狠心将9个月大的男童,头朝地板砸去,导致死亡,装修商也被控蓄意造成严重伤害。 据悉,男童并非被告的孩子,而是其女友的幼儿。 被告为27岁的默罕默德阿里夫(Mohamed Aliff Bin Mohamed Yusoff),他被控于上周四(11月7日)晚上10时至周五(8日)凌晨12时15分期间,在义顺81街第840A座的多层停车场内,蓄意重伤只有九个月大的男童,伊兹法雅斯(Izz Fayyaz Bin Ahmad)。 根据法庭文件指出,被告当时涉嫌将男童的头部朝一辆货车的地板砸去,导致男童重伤,最后身亡。 被告也因此抵触了《刑事法典》第325条文中,蓄意造成严重伤害罪名。…

“Even in the cyberage, some things don’t change”

Despite assurances, political space in S’pore shrinks further. Andrew Loh.