(Image – gov.sg YouTube channel)

By Howard Lee

The ruling People’s Action Party would indeed be naive if it were to believe that the issue that drew a massive bone of contention following the last general election would be quietly forgotten.

No, we are not talking about the Prime Minister suing Roy Ngerng or the arrest of Amos Yee, raucous a these were. The 6.9 million target for the Population White Paper is still very much with us, in spite of the many moons that have passed since it was first mooted in February 2013. Has the government’s position changed since then, when it decided to couch it as a “planning tool” rather than a “projection target”?

Without doubt, this single proposal that drew the largest organic turnout at Speakers’ Corner left a smarting wound in the PAP’s side, to which no opposition party had, wisely, even bothered to offer sympathies. Faced with public transport congestion, competition for jobs and the squeeze in leisure spaces, Singaporeans have openly made their displeasure known.

Where does the government currently stand on the population influx issue? Judging from a recent quote by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, where he compared Singapore’s population woes with China’s, not much has really changed:

“So, we slow down the foreign intake — we have corrected the policy. But we need to let people know more about our dilemma, that we have this responsibility as the country’s leaders,” he said. “This is a hot potato for the Singapore Government, but we’re the leaders, and we hope people will accept that we have good intentions.”

The wound still smarts, if it takes the PM to make at attempt at justifying it, particularly so close to the next general elections. But it seems to have gotten back to an issue of “letting people know”, or as it was famously put after GE2011, a “communication problem”.

workProductivity as (conditional) lever

The government has clearly taken note of the displeasure from the ground, but it remains to be seen if there were any real significant changes to manage the population issue.

The moderation of foreign worker numbers was first mooted in 2014. However, there are reasons to believe that the actual numbers have not really gone down. In addition, we need to remember that this is a temporary freeze, and while the former Manpower Minister has indicated that there would be no u-turn to more stringent foreign manpower curbs, he was also mindful to “provide flexibility in industries such as healthcare and landscaping, where there is an essential economic or social need.”

In addition, “sector-specific needs have already been catered for through the different Dependency Ratio Ceilings for the five sectors – Services, Manufacturing, Construction, Marine and Process.” Other solutions for raising productivity seems to revolve around throwing more money into the sectors in question, such as S$450 million over three years for the construction industry to adopt more technology to reduce manpower reliance.

The success of such measures remain to be seen, but meanwhile, the threat of a return to earlier foreign labour grown currently hangs over us with one benchmark – productivity. Whereas the White Paper had earlier suggested that foreign workers are needed to make up for our slow population growth – as if babies can be put to work to support our economy – the new mantra is now to focus on Singaporeans’ contribution to economic growth.

Essentially, would a further drop in productivity signal the government to salvage faltering GDP figures by returning to unrestrained foreign labour growth?

(Image - gov.sg YouTube channel)
(Image – gov.sg YouTube channel)

Cultural persuasion

Beyond this supposed management of foreign manpower, efforts have also been made to inculcate a greater acceptance towards a growing population of foreigners or “new citizens”. The

Nowhere is this more apparent than in the government creating an entire series of videos to encourage Singaporeans to “Think About It” and hopefully bring a different perspective on why foreign workers are important to Singapore society and our economy.

The series consists of mini “dramas” that depict Singaporeans presumably xenophobic attitudes countered by a more restrained logical evaluation. There are also forums held with media personalities, community leaders and politicians to debate the issue.

Comments to the video series had been disabled, so there is no way to ascertain public response to them. Nevertheless, there is a good chance that they have been produced by the government, as they are all hosted on gov.sg’s YouTube channel. We might not ever know the amount of tax-payers’ money specifically spent on the series, but what is clear is that they are in line with the PM’s hope that “people will accept that the government has good intentions” in proposing population augmentation.

Also read “The 6.9 million issue – Part 2: Still short-sighted?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TOC hosts thank-you bbq

TOC hosted a bbq gathering for our friends and members to thank them for their support and contribution in helping us achieve 1,000,000 hits a few months ago. The evening saw more than 30 people turn up – a wonderful mix of people – from politicians to civil society activists to ordinary S’poreans who care about S’pore.

Mega church New Creation Church buys Star Vista Mall for S$296 million

New Creation Church (NCC) has officially bought The Star Vista Mall via…

MDA insists exiles film threatens "national security", upholds ban

  The Media Development Authority has upheld its earlier decision to classify…

商讨海域边界议题 新马海域边界委员会召开首次会议

新马海域边界委员会于周一(5月13日),在我国召开首次会议。 会议由马国外交部秘书长慕哈末沙鲁尔,以及我国外交部常任秘书池伟强联合主持,而会议出席者也包括马国驻新高级专员拿督再诺拉欣再鲁丁、马来西亚外交部海洋司司长阿迪娜·卡玛鲁丁以及其他各政府机构代表。 新马海域边界委员会是针对两国海域边界问题而设立,其中以柔佛海峡扩大港口限制的问题课题为重点,希望能透过正式商讨方式取得进展。 新马两国于上月9日进行非正式峰会,透过两国联合声明同意友好协商两国纠纷,并针对争议已久的海域边界问题进行商讨。 对此,双方提出五大建议,希望能在商谈边界议题上取得进展。 双方同意成立海域边界委员会,确保在一个月内先后执行四项建议,再来针对海域边界的划定预计能在四项建议执行完毕后进行磋商。 此前,马国与我国各自在宪报上颁布将各国的港口海域延伸至新山港口海域内,导致新山与新加坡港口海域重叠,引起争议。 尔后,双方也在非正式峰会上宣布暂停对重叠港界的声索,将港界恢复到争议前的状态后,平息纷争。