funpack distribution

“Bishan East celebrates SG50 with grassroots adviser Mr Wong Kan Seng; Funpack Distribution,” writes a banner for a buffet dinner organised for a private condomiun and the nearby landed properties.

It was announced earlier that every Singaporean and PR household will receive a SG Funpack for Singapore’s jubilee anniversary while NDP 2015’s spectators will receive a National Day Parade Funpack.

Sharing the findings from conversations with condo Management Committee, Bishan East Neighbourhood Committee, Bishan-Toa Payoh CCC, the resident informs The Online Citizen (TOC) of fun pack distributions carried out by the Citizens’ Consultative Committee (CCC) in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC with free buffet dinners paid by the CCC.

“Since they (took the) trouble to bring to our condo door steps, with free dinner to boot, I went down with my family of 4 to collect.” said the resident.

The resident added, “Event started 6.30pm and I saw families streaming down. Around 50-60 were already at BBQ area. I went there 7.30pm.

Consider buffet caters for 200, and using average three household members attend, est 70 households present. This is only about 31% (70/224) who would be collecting their fun packs.

This is also collaborated by my observation of the name list I signed which has less 50% signed.”

wong kan seng
MP Wong Kan Seng with residents at the funpack buffet dinner

In fact, this is not the only funpack distribution organised for the residents. According to the committee members, this funpack distribution is being held within all condominiums for the residents and in parks for landed properties. The resident also heard from the managing committee that dinners are held at individual condos on different dates.

One MC member who mentioned to the resident that a typical function which MC organize, caters to about 200+ people with a budget of $12 per pax.

The dinner that was catered by the CCC
  • Curry chicken
  • Fried fish in tomato sauce
  • Chicken franks
  • Fried toufu in oyster sauce
  • Cauliflower veg
  • Curry samosa
  • Fried maggi mee
  • Fried rice
  • Desserts (assorted cakes, almond jelly)
  • Fruit punch drink

The caterer confirmed with the resident on the event that took place, was meant for 200 at a special corporate rate $10/pax (normal $15.90/pax). The caterer also shared that if anyone were to book at such quantity, they would not be giving such special rate.

This means it would have cost the CCC at least $2,000 to run the event. With at least 13 condos and a number of landed properties in the Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, the CCC is likely to spend over $20,000 on such buffet dinners to give out the funpacks to residents with the presence of the Member of Parliament who doubles up as the grassroots advisor.

The resident said, “Whereas public housing citizens have to go to CC (community centres), queue to collect fun packs. Wonder if RCs do this for (the) convenience of their HDB blocks?”

It is also said that CCC will fund private residential function up to 50% of operating cost, with a limit of $1000 for festive events e.g., Chinese New Year, lantern festival, etc.

Grassroots organisations such as the CCCs, RCs and MCs were in news recently over the Auditor General’s Office report on their accounting lapses, which involved sums totalling $17.78 million.

In the budget debate earlier this year, expenditure for the governing body of GROs, People’s Association (PA) was increased 51.3% to over S$1 billion.

Minister Lim Swee Say, Minister (Prime Minister’s Office) and Deputy Chairman of PA, said that the budget allocated to the PA “reflects a higher level of commitment by the Government towards promoting social cohesion and racial harmony.”

He explained that the increase of $100.3 million or 29.5% in operating expenditure will go into implementing the Pioneer Generation Ambassador programme where staff and volunteers reach out to seniors where they live, as well as supporting the work of the grassroots organisations (GROs) and Community Development Councils (CDCs) in assisting the needy and in building and bonding our multi-racial and multi-cultural communities.

According to polling agents in the last General Election 2011, the ruling party, People’s Action Party saw lower supporter from the higher income voters. Specifically in the Holland Bukit Timah GRC where most of the opposition votes came from the landed properties.

It is to be seen in the upcoming General Election if such bonding exercises and spending of public money would improve the ruling party’s standing with the well-to-do Singaporean voters.

[total-poll id=70478]
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

议员质问国际化新加坡如何应对“外国影响” 尚穆根重申政党、政治人物、媒体不得接受外国资金

官委议员特斯拉博士与王丽婷,双双在国会质问内政部,如何确认和应对“外国势力干预”的威胁?王丽婷也质问当局是否能公开那些可能面对上述风险的组织/个人名单?乃至于必须规定媒体只能由本地人担任? 至于特斯拉则在提问中指出,有鉴于新加坡企业和个体大多全球化,因此接受/有外国资源往来是很普遍的,在这前提下,又该如何保护国人免受“外国势力影响”? 内政冀律政部长尚穆根则回应,这并不意味着要回避所有的外国影响,而主要是对付那些可能破坏社会、削弱国家或影响外交政策的外国影响,他指出所有国家都会如是保护自身。 特斯拉续表达他的担忧,质疑在评估所谓外国影响的风险,是否应考量他们的所作所为或倡议观点,而不是仅根据是否接受外国资金,或外籍人士掌握敏感职位等。因为如果过早下定论,反而阻遏作为国际化社会的新加坡人去和外界交流。 尚穆根解释,现有法律禁止,那些将代表本土新加坡人参选的本地政党和政治人物,接受外国资金,但不代表组织他们参与国际观点讨论;但他强调在《报章与印刷法》下,禁止由外国人资助或掌握本地报纸。 “确保我国政治环境免受外国影响” “更广义来说,是确保我国政治环境、政治进程免受外国人影响,多年来也推出一系列相关法令,我想新加坡人接受这点。美国人也能接受这点。” 他以《东方日报》(Eastern Sun)和《新加坡先驱报》(Singapore Herald)为例,指由虎标万金油创办人胡文虎长子胡蛟筹办的《东方日报》,接受在香港设办公处的中共新闻机构的600万贷款办报;创办后再接受120万元,条件是委任中方顾问;让中方可掌控本地媒体,在狮城建立间谍网。 《东方日报》在1966年创刊,面向当时在地的英语读者市场。在1971年5月新加坡政府在针对媒体的“黑色行动”中,除了《南洋商报》包括前总经理李茂成、总编等人被捕,当时《东方日报》也被指遭中方利用控制。 尚穆根强调新加坡政治应由新加坡人负责,他不反对国人在经济、学术或政治上与外国交流,惟者有别于领取外国资金或允许他人左右行政。…

《Count On Me Singapore》 遭篡改成印度爱国歌曲

新加坡爱国歌曲之一《Count On Me Singapore》(相信我吧新加坡),是本地家喻户晓国庆爱国曲作,抒发国人对家国的情怀,呼吁国人为新加坡的愿景携手共进。 由来自加拿大的词曲创作人休·哈里森(Hugh Harrison)创作于1986年,曹思平(Clement Chow)演唱,《Count On Me Singapore》描绘和激励国人,能向世界展示新加坡的能力,“我们能办得到”(We can achieve)。…

Documentation of diphtheria and measles vaccination required for foreign-born children applying for long-term immigration passes

Foreign-born children will have to submit documentation of diphtheria and measles vaccination as a…

PIE高架桥坍塌事故审判 专业工程师囚86周罚款一万元

负责为高架桥进行设计的,结果却导致坍塌事故的工程师今早被判86周监禁与1万元罚款。 该起事故当中的46岁印尼籍专业工程师罗伯特(Robert Arianto Tjandra),日前已针对一项工作场所安全与卫生法令,以及两项建筑管制法令控状认罪。 法官在宣判期间,表示本案造成伤害的可能极高,并斥责被告鲁莽行为导致建筑工人重伤,需为事件承担主要责任。 被告被指涉嫌在规划建筑工作上,知悉本身团队缺乏桥梁设计经验,并未能及时给予指导与指示。另外,他也被指罔顾他人性命,为审查桥梁的设计图样疏忽,而且在团队计算错误后,仍未能采取有效补救措施。 然而,事后被告还擅自增加工程修补,但为时已晚。法官认为,被告作为专业人士应承担主责,确保高架桥的安全,指他之后强化枕梁不能成为求情根据。 与此同时,被告的鲁莽行为导致建筑工人重伤,也让工程只能延后至2022年竣工,浪费社会资源。对此,他表示认罪。 他除了涉嫌一项抵触工作场所安全与卫生法令(Workplce Safety and Health…